06. November 2005 · Comments Off on Investigate The CIA · Categories: General

Just how bad did the CIA screw-up in the Wilson/Plame affair? While this doesn’t cover the outting of Plame to Moscow and Havana, here’s everything else from Victoria Toensing at OpinionJournal:

In a surprise, closed-door debate, Senate Democrats last week demanded an investigation of pre-Iraq War intelligence. Here’s an issue for them: Assess the validity of the claim that Valerie Plame’s status was “covert,” or even properly classified, given the wretched tradecraft by the Central Intelligence Agency throughout the entire episode. It was, after all, the CIA that requested the “leak” investigation, alleging that one of its agents had been outed in Bob Novak’s July 14, 2003, column. Yet it was the CIA’s bizarre conduct that led inexorably to Ms. Plame’s unveiling.

When the Intelligence Identities Protection Act was being negotiated, Senate Select Committee Chairman Barry Goldwater was adamant: If the CIA desired a law making it illegal to expose one of its deep cover employees, then the agency must do a much better job of protecting their cover. That is why a criterion for any prosecution under the act is that the government was taking “affirmative measures” to conceal the protected person’s relationship to the intelligence agency. Two decades later, the CIA, either purposely or with gross negligence, made a series of decisions that led to Ms. Plame becoming a household name:

Read the whole thing.

04. November 2005 · Comments Off on Valour-IT · Categories: A Href, General, Home Front

Sgt Hook liberated my tear ducts yet again (ok, I admit it – I’m a sap), this time with a post he uses to explain why he’s supporting the Valour-IT project.

If you’ve not heard of Valour-IT yet, you must not have been making the rounds of the milblogosphere. Valour-IT is the brainchild of Soldier’s Angels, and stands for “Voice Activated Laptops for OUR Injured Troops.” One of the side-effects of an IED is often the loss of hands/arms, or at the least the use thereof, for awhile. With voice-activated laptops, our comrades in arms could still be tied into the ‘net, email, blogs, etc. Contributions are tax-deductible.

04. November 2005 · Comments Off on Friday Recipe-Blogging: A Chicken in Every Pot · Categories: Domestic, General

This is a lovely recipe for a whole chicken, butterflied and baked on a layer of seasoned, sauteed onions and slices of stout artisanal bread. I found it in “Cuisine at Home”, where it had been taken from Ari Weinzweig’s “Zingerman’s Guide to Good Eating”. Enjoy… but take note that the bread has to be very sturdy. My local supermarket bakery does a very nice ciabetta loaf that works well.

Sautee in 1/4 cup olive oil in a cast-iron skillet or oven-proof skillet approx. 12 inches in diameter:
3 large onions, halved, and sliced into half-moon shapes
3 cups celery, sliced

Stir in:
2 tsp. minced lemon zest
1 3/4 tsp. coars sea or kosher salt
1 tsp. minced garlic
1/2 tsp. freshly ground pepper
1/2 tsp. dried thyme
1/2 tsp. red pepper flakes
1/4 cup chopped fresh Italian parsley

While the onion is cooking, butterfly one 3-4 lb young chicken, snipping along the backbone with kitchen shears on either side. Spread out the chicken flat, and press down with the palm of your hand on the breastbone to crack and flatten it. Rub the butterflied chicken with 2 Tbsp. olive oil, 1 tsp. freshly ground pepper, and 1/2 tsp. salt

When onions are soft and translucent, empty the onion mixture from the pan, remove from heat, and cover the bottom of the skillet with slices of the bread, cut 1/2 inch thick. The recipe calls for about half a baguette, or two ciabatta rolls. Spread out onion mixture on top of the bread, and top with the butterflied chicken, arranging it to cover as much of the surface of the onion and bread as possible. Pour over the chicken:

1/4 cup fresh lemon juice.

Roast uncovered, in a pre-heated 375 deg. oven for about an hour and a half, until beautifully golden-brown. Let stand for ten minutes after being taken out of the oven. To serve, cut chicken into quarters, and serve over a lavish spoonful of the vegetables and the bread, which will be almost caramelized on the bottom.

04. November 2005 · Comments Off on Seasonal Blogging: Autumn · Categories: General

View toward the Mountains, Japan 1977

Autumn scene, on the road towards Lake Towada, Northern Japan 1977

03. November 2005 · Comments Off on Washington State’s DOMA on the ropes · Categories: General

This from Mark Rosenberg at RedState:

The Washington Supreme Court is expected to rule very soon on several consolidated cases seeking to overturn the state’s Defense Of Marriage Act, which defines marriage as between a man and woman. I’ll admit that what immediately follows is no finely-considered point of legal analysis, but then again that’s not always this court’s stock in trade, either – and so I wonder if, given that a lesbian jilted by her lover for a male may still qualify as a “defacto parent” based on six years of cohabitation with a child, what then is to stop this particular court from also concluding that gay couples cohabitating for a certain number of years are “defacto spouses” deserving the full legal status of marriage?

As I have said before, government has no place defining the terms of a marriage contract, only enforcing those terms once a contract is entered into.

03. November 2005 · Comments Off on How do you say I love you? · Categories: A Href, General

One soldier found a way that’s more unique than anything I’ve ever encountered before. Go read it.

And the next time you hear a bird sing, stop and listen – really listen – to its song.

hat tip: Sgt Hook

03. November 2005 · Comments Off on Libby And The CIA: Two Views · Categories: General

Spencer Ackerman at TNR claims the CIA doesn’t care about Libby:

Indeed, despite a fervent belief on the right that the CIA is determined to sabotage the Bush administration by any means necessary, Langley denizens are preoccupied with the more pressing matter of Bush’s installation of loyalist Porter Goss as CIA director; his rearrangement of the intelligence community, which has left the CIA in a nebulous and insecure position; and America’s unraveling fortunes in the Iraq war. While Plame still has advocates among her colleagues, even allies like Johnson see that the CIA has much bigger fish to fry at the moment. “I just had drinks with another classmate of mine and Valerie,” he notes. The leak investigation took a quick backseat in their conversation: “He says, ‘You know, if we had set out as our purpose to create an Iraq possessed by an insurgency that won’t stop, we couldn’t have done a better job.'” The administration might view Libby’s indictment as a victory for Langley in an ongoing war with the intelligence community–a bunker mentality that, as Fitzgerald’s indictment suggests, in no small measure triggered the Plame leak itself. But rather than considering itself triumphant, the CIA is far more concerned with mitigating the damage from having lost far more battles with this White House than it has won.

[…]

A potent mixture of contempt for, and fear of, the intelligence community has been characteristic of neoconservatives for decades before Plame ever joined the CIA. When after September 11 the agency failed to come up with evidence of Iraqi complicity with Al Qaeda or an advanced Iraqi nuclear-weapons program, that hostility reached a fever pitch. As a former colleague of Libby’s told me and Franklin Foer in 2003, “They so believed that the CIA were wrong, they were like, ‘We want to show these fuckers that they are wrong.'” Furthermore, it’s not as if the CIA didn’t hit back: Both before and after the invasion, dubious official statements about Iraq were rebutted by anonymous CIA quotes in the press attempting to reacquaint President Bush with reality. According to Fitzgerald’s indictment, following publication of a TNR story about administration deception on Iraq in June 2003, Libby conferred with aide Eric Edelman to discuss a counterattack and bemoaned “selective leaks” by the CIA in a conversation with Judith Miller of The New York Times; shortly thereafter, columnist Robert Novak, citing two senior administration officials, revealed Plame’s identity.

But Glenn Reynolds says they SHOULD care – very much:

THE BIG LOSER in the Libby affair, it would seem to me, is the CIA. At least it will be if anyone pays attention.

Consider: Assuming that Valerie Plame was some sort of genuinely covert operative — something that’s not actually quite clear from the indictment — the chain of events looks pretty damning: Wilson was sent to Africa on an investigative mission regarding nuclear weapons, but never asked to sign any sort of secrecy agreement(!). Wilson returns, reports, then publishes an oped in the New York Times (!!) about his mission. This pretty much ensures that people will start asking why he was sent, which leads to the fact that his wife arranged it. Once Wilson’s oped appeared, Plame’s covert status was in serious danger. Yet nobody seemed to care.

This leaves two possibilities. One is that the mission was intended to result in the New York Times oped all along, meaning that the CIA didn’t care much about Plame’s status, and was trying to meddle in domestic politics. This reflects very badly on the CIA.

The other possibility is that they’re so clueless that they did this without any nefarious plan, because they’re so inept, and so prone to cronyism and nepotism, that this is just business as usual. If so, the popular theory that the CIA couldn’t find its own weenie with both hands and a flashlight would appear to have found some pretty strong support.

Either way, it seems to me that everyone involved with planning the Wilson mission should be fired. And it’s obvious that the CIA, one way or another, needs a lot of work.

UPDATE: More thoughts here.

ANOTHER UPDATE: Ed Morrissey is correcting Wolf Blitzer, who seems to have a poor grasp of the facts.

MORE: Don’t miss this must-read post from Tom Maguire, either.

And Brian Dunn has more questions about why Wilson was sent.

I believe that the CIA’s problem with Porter Goss is directly related to their history of incompetence – which well predates the Bush Administration. Finally, someone has been put in place to roust them from their cushy berths, and they don’t like it.

02. November 2005 · Comments Off on Betcha’ Didn’t See This On Gizmodo · Categories: General, Technology

No Kidding… a COMPUTERIZED toothbrush.

I think, like razors, much of this is just gimmickry.

02. November 2005 · Comments Off on My new potluck dish · Categories: Domestic, General

I’ve already warned my friends that this is what I’ll be bringing to T-giving dinner, this year. A friend of mine bought a San Antonio cookbook from the BX in 1991 before she ETS’d. She says this one recipe was worth the price of the cookbook. When she takes it to potlucks, she makes a double batch, and never brings any leftovers home.

SAVORY GREEN BEANS

1 1/2 pounds fresh green beans
1/4 cup cooking oil
1 clove garlic minced
1 tablespoon chopped onion
1 cup diced green pepper
1/4 cup boiling water
1/2 teaspoon salt
1 teaspoon basil
1/2 cup parmesan cheese, grated

Wash and trim ends off beans and cut into 1 1/2-inch pieces. In a saucepan, heat oil and garlic. Add onion and green pepper. Cook for 3 minutes. Add beans, water, salt and basil. Cover and simmer for 15 minutes or longer until beans are tender. Stir in 1/4 cup parmesan cheese. Turn into serving dish and sprinkle with remaining cheese.

YIELD: 6 servings.

Notes:

The friend who gave me this recipe cooks the beans for about 45 minutes – they think that’s just the right amount of crunchy without being too crunchy. I find 40 minutes work for me. You may prefer something different.

I use both red and green bell peppers, for extra color. I’ve also added diced fresh mushrooms.

01. November 2005 · Comments Off on IPOD Life · Categories: General

Timmer, I can’t tell you how glad I am you wrote about your IPOD when you got it. That’s what really got me started thinking about whether I might someday want one.

I now have over 13GB of music/audiobooks (almost 20 days worth!) transferred over to the ‘Pod, but my favorite feature (I think) is that I can copy photos to it and show them to folks, no ‘puter required. I’ll need to get the a/v cable before I take it home with me to Ohio or to Texas for T-giving, because while that little 2″ screen looks great, sometimes you just need a bigger screen.

I also love how easy it is to burn CDs from ITunes. I download audiobooks from audible.com, and burning them to CD was a tedious undertaking, at best. ITunes is much more automated, and seems to be quicker, as well. Not that I need to burn them to CD anymore, since I have the FM transmitter for the ‘Pod, but it’s nice to have an alternative.

I’m not quite to the “how did I live without one” stage, but overall, it’s a gadget I’m glad I’m got.

31. October 2005 · Comments Off on Live TrickerTreat Blogging #1 · Categories: Ain't That America?, Domestic, General

6:32 PM CST, and only three parties, ringing the doorbell.

A little boy in glasses, with a lighted magic wand and Hogwarts robes, another in Army cammies, and one in some sort of super-hero ninja dress.

A very tiny toddler in a stroller, dressed as a cat. Her mother expressed a fondness for chocolate.

A small ninja, accompanied by both parents, who took one single packet of glow-in-the-dark Skittles, and was pressed to take an additional Reeses’ Peanut Butter Cup.

I was thanked lavishly by all, or by their closely-hovering parents.

I went out to look up and down the road for other TrickerTreaters. None in sight, although there are a number of dogs barking from other streets. Probably safe to sit down and eat dinner.

7:34 CST: A party of four, one dressed as a Star Wars Trooper, the other four as something indistinctive. The glow-in-the-dark Skittles are the most popular. As they go down the walk, one of them loudly chides the other three for not saying “Thank You”. There is hope for this younger generation, after all.

8:00 CST: Party of 5, mostly dressed as ghouls. Most want the glow-in-the-dark Skittles. I am running short of those, and begin to push the Reeses. All 5 line up neatly, take no more than two packets of candy each, and chorus thanks.

8:05 CST; Party of 6, middle-school age, most of whom , like the previous party are dressed as ghouls or ghosts. With only one packet of glow-in-the-dark Skittles left, the taller of the two children remaining nobly yields it to the smaller. Two of them voice a preference for Reeses’ and Twix anyway.
The last two packets of candy goes to the last TrickerTreater. Wonderful how these things work out.

I turn off the porch light, and take the iron-dutch oven– in which I have stashed the candy, inside. The oven, a broom and two pumpkins on the front porch constitute my Halloween decor. When I have gotten tired of answering the door in previous years, I have just put out a sign telling them to help themselves. Would that I could train Little Arthur and Morgie to sit on the pumpkins and glower threateningly— that would have kept the greedy from taking more than two or three candy bars each.

But everything worked out even this year— just enough candy, just enough kids.

31. October 2005 · Comments Off on Wiped from the Map · Categories: Domestic, General, History, War, World

A day or so after Thanksgiving of the year when I was in the seventh or eight grade, and hated gym class above all the other torments that junior high school offered in bounteous measure, I had a short conversation with another girl in my gym class. We were not particular friends, only that our lockers were adjacent, and we would be changing out of our school dress, into the black shorts and short-sleeved, snap-closure white blouse that Mt. Gleason Junior High dictated to be proper gym class attire. I don’t even remember her name, only that she was sturdy and somewhat stocky and like me, blue-eyed with dark-blond, brown-sugar colored hair and a fair complexion… and like me, not particularly enthusiastic about gym class, and all its’ works and all its’ ways. Both of us were of the devoutly un-athletic sort who picks a team position based on the likely chances of having little or nothing to do with the ball.

So, on this first day of gym after the Thanksgiving holiday, I struck up a conversation about it, about how my family Thanksgiving had gone— how all the constellation of great-aunts, great-uncles, and grandparents had gathered for the ritual feast. The family Hayes had gathered at either Grannie Jessie’s little white house on South Lotus, or Grannie Dodie and Grandpa Al’s house in Camarillo. I can’t recollect which, so unvarying was the rotation, so regular the attendance of the senior members and devout their interest in JP and I, Pippy and our new baby brother. Most of them being for one reason or another, childless, I lamented the lack of cousins, for it meant their concentration on the four of us as torch-bearers of a new generation was as focused as a laser-beam, and I assumed that the same was true of my gym-dressing room friend.

“Oh, no,” said she. ”It’s just my parents, and my brothers and sisters. We don’t have any cousins either. All of my parents’ families… they all died. We don’t have any cousins, either.”
“None of them? None at all?” I asked, in disbelief. No fond grandparents, no doting great-aunts, no eccentric great-uncles? None of them at all, nothing outside the usual parents and sibs at the dinner table, nothing special, relations-wise, about the holiday table, with roasted turkey, crackling-fat and richly stuffed with brown-bread dressing? About this time in life, my peers had begun to lose grandparents to the usual span of human mortality— I had lately lost one, Grandpa Jim, and thought myself lucky to still have three, all of them still healthy, cantankerous and good for another couple of decades. To have none at all, though… that went beyond misfortune. That was a catastrophe.

My gym-friend shrugged.
“My parents met after the war, in a DP camp. They were just kids. It turned out they were both the only survivors of their families. They got married and came here. There was nothing for them to go back for, anyway.”

Nothing to go back for, anyway, in Poland, Czechoslovakia, the Ukraine… somewhere in Middle-Europe, wherever her family trees had sprung up and been pruned with brutal finality of all but two last little shoots. Transplanted, new-rooted in America, but haunted forever by a ghostly range of empty chairs around the table at those family gatherings so universally assumed to me multi-generational.

The genocide against European Jews is as much of a challenge today to get ones’ sensible American head around as it was sixty years ago. Us Indian-massacring (sorry, Native American massacring!) slavery-enabling, Negro-lynching (Sorry— Persons of Color lynching!) religion-addled, brutally-capitalist, petty-small-town minded uncultured Jacksonians are forever being lectured about our shortcomings by those cultured Europeans. Europe was, after all, the place where they did everything better than us… more cultured, more tolerant, and oh-so-much-better in every civilized way. And yet, pogroms never happened here. Social prejudice, country-club anti-Semitism, distrust of the “other”— oh yeah, all of that…but never pogroms. Russian and Polish Jews came here to get away from pogroms, ungrateful and unappreciative of the cultural advantages to living in Europe.

The clamor of the lectures by our so-called moral superiors pretty much swamps the observation that the Native American and Black American communities still exist in a far more vibrant state than, say, the Jewish communities of Poland… and that Paris, the city of Light has a suburb torn for the fourth night running by what we, in our uncouth American way, used to call race riots. Ah, well, Europe— they do things with so much more style, over there. Sixty years ago, under German occupation, ordinary Europeans watched their neighbors, their friends, coworkers, classmates, employers and employees, their doctors, and cleaning women rounded up and marched away to oblivion. Some eagerly assisted; some benefited from participating, most watched and turned away and did nothing, not wishing to risk what might happen to them, should they be too open in objection. A very few righteous, possessed of a fiercely refined moral sense, and courage of the sort usually termed “crazy-brave” did what they could… that there was anything left of European Jewry by 1945 was a sort of miracle in itself. On a national level, only the Danes can be credited for behaving in a way that we hope we could ourselves be equal to, given the same situation. They refused, categorically, firmly, and in a manner most breathtakingly effective, to turn over Danish citizens of the Jewish faith to the occupying German authorities… of course, the Germans had gone easily on the Danes, hoping to win them over to the benefits of the Thousand-year Reich… but still, and all… German blandishments did not tempt them to sell out their fellow citizens.

So, during a week in which the elected leader of Iran, which has done everything it can to acquire or develop nuclear weapons, has publicly and in terms quite straightforward and understandable, vowed an intention to wipe Israel off the map… a small and pesky nation formed in no small part from the survivors of the European-wide holocaust. What would a single nuclear hit do to a tiny and democratic survivor-state? Nothing good, that should go without saying. So, what will Europe do, this time? How stalwart will be European resolve be to intervene, given that Israel was referred to as “that shitty little country” by a French diplomat at an English dinner party, that anti-Semitism (now charmingly called anti-Zionism) is at a revoltingly open, all-time high? No matter what they call it, it’s still used for the same old purpose, to kill Jews, or at least, justify their murder by a third party. How nice. How amusing, that European hands would be kept clean of the murder of Jews. This time, anyway.

Oh, yeah… if I were a Jew, I’d think twice before depending on Europe to keep my ass safe… especially given how effective they were, overall, about that the last time.

The eastern world, it is explodin’.
Violence flarin’, bullets loadin’
You’re old enough to kill, but not for votin’
You don’t believe in war, but what’s that gun you’re totin’
And even the Jordan River has bodies floatin’

But you tell me
Over and over and over again, my friend
Ah, you don’t believe
We’re on the eve
of destruction.

Don’t you understand what I’m tryin’ to say
Can’t you feel the fears I’m feelin’ today?
If the button is pushed, there’s no runnin’ away
There’ll be no one to save, with the world in a grave
Take a look around you boy
It’s bound to scare you boy

And you tell me
Over and over and over again, my friend
Ah, you don’t believe
We’re on the eve
of destruction.

31. October 2005 · Comments Off on Alito Nomination Revives Discussion Of Father’s Rights · Categories: General

Many hyperbolic statements are coming from the radical left, relative to SCOTUS nominee Sam Alito’s opinion in a Pennsylvania case involving spousal notification prior to abortion. Glenn Reynolds makes this counterpoint:

I’m not sure about Pennsylvania, but in many states her spouse — even if he’s not the father of the child — would still be on the hook for child support. Likewise, if he didn’t want children, but she disagreed, lied to him about birth control, and got pregnant. And he certainly couldn’t force her to have an abortion if she did so, even if his desire not to have children was powerful, and explicitly expressed at the outset. (The usual response — “he made his choice when he had sex without a condom” — never comes up in discussions of women and abortion.)

So where’s the husband’s procreational autonomy? Did he give it up by getting married? And, if he did, is it unthinkable that when they get married women might give some of their autonomy up, too?

The problem here is that you can say “my body, my choice” — but when you say, “my body, my choice but our responsibility,” well, it loses some of its punch.

30. October 2005 · Comments Off on Getting Gouged At The Gas Pump · Categories: General

This from the Tax Foundation via TaxProf:

[F]ederal and state taxes on gasoline production and imports have been climbing steadily since the late 1970s and now total roughly $58.4 billion. Due in part to substantial hikes in the federal gasoline excise tax in 1983, 1990, and 1993, annual tax revenues have continued to grow. Since 1977, governments collected more than $1.34 trillion, after adjusting for inflation, in gasoline tax revenues—more than twice the amount of domestic profits earned by major U.S. oil companies during the same period:

Year

Oil Profits

Federal Taxes

State Taxes

Total Taxes

1977

$26.8

$13.7

$29.0

$42.7

1978

$27.5

$13.0

$28.1

$41.1

1979

$34.9

$11.4

$25.2

$36.7

1980

$41.0

$9.4

$22.0

$31.4

1981

$41.4

$8.5

$21.0

$29.5

1982

$35.8

$8.0

$20.6

$28.6

1983

$30.2

$15.0

$22.0

$37.0

1984

$28.7

$16.2

$23.5

$39.6

1985

$29.3

$15.6

$24.6

$40.2

1986

$9.0

$15.9

$25.7

$41.5

1987

$14.0

$15.0

$27.4

$42.4

1988

$16.9

$15.6

$28.1

$43.8

1989

$14.5

$14.5

$28.3

$42.8

1990

$18.6

$14.5

$29.1

$43.5

1991

$11.0

$21.1

$29.7

$50.8

1992

$10.1

$20.9

$30.8

$51.7

1993

$10.6

$20.9

$31.4

$52.3

1994

$10.8

$27.1

$32.1

$59.3

1995

$7.9

$26.3

$31.9

$58.1

1996

$18.9

$26.8

$32.0

$58.9

1997

$18.8

$26.0

$32.6

$58.6

1998

$9.0

$27.1

$33.1

$60.3

1999

$16.8

$26.5

$33.6

$60.1

2000

$34.9

$25.7

$33.3

$59.0

2001

$35.1

$24.9

$33.6

$58.5

2002

$16.2

$24.5

$33.9

$58.4

2003

$31.7

$24.6

$33.4

$58.0

2004

$42.6

$24.2

$34.2

$58.4

Total

$643.0

$533.0

$810.1

$1,343.1

Hat Tip: InstaPundit

30. October 2005 · Comments Off on Plame Game Errant Thought · Categories: Ain't That America?, General, Home Front, Media Matters Not, My Head Hurts, That's Entertainment!

After what seems like months of this impenetrable, three-ring media/political circus, I have finally had a thought about the Plame Affair… no, not the one which everyone else has had… “Say What?????!!!” coupled with a plea for aspirin. This thought is original to me, and I have not seen it suggested anywhere else, and that is…

What if practically everyone inside the Washington Beltway was already vaguely aware that Valerie Plame Wilson worked for the CIA? What if this was such common knowledge that practically everyone involved really cannot remember how they came to know it, or who first told them… especially if it came about through casual social gossip?

Well, really, it would account for a number of supposedly clever, politically adroit politicians and reporters suddenly stuck in the spotlight, fumbling for an answer to the question “Who told you, and when did you know?”

Practically anything sounds better than “Everyone knew, I don’t know and I forget when!”

28. October 2005 · Comments Off on The Comparo That Had To Be · Categories: General

On the cover of my latest Automobile magazine (11/05): “Civil War! Z06 vs Ford GT vs Viper [coupe].” I expect the other major automags will follow suit.

Of course, revivals of the old Chevy, Ford, Dodge rivalry aside, this is more a matter of contrast than comparison, as these are three distinctly different cars. But some excerpts are worth noting:

[T]hese are America’s greatest cars – and two of them, the GT and the Corvette, are among the world’s best cars.

In performance, price, and driving pleasure, [the Z06] blows the current Porsche 911 Carrera S away[.]

Now all the American industry has to do is up the ante with its more affordable cars

Well, the ante is being upped – across the board. I’ve raved about other new American cars on this blog – the Opel Omega based Cadillac CTS comes to mind. And now it seems the Mazda 6 based Ford Fusion is a star player.

28. October 2005 · Comments Off on Friday Recipe: Lentil & Brown Rice Soup · Categories: Domestic, General

I promised in comments to Timmer’s recipe post last week that I would post my favorite cold-weather soup recipe. It’s from Nava Atlas’ “Vegetariana”

Combine in a large pot:
1/2 Cup dried lentils, washed and picked over
1/3-1/2 Cup brown rice
2 TBSp olive oil
2 cloves garlic, minced
2 TBSp soy sauce
2 Bay leaves
3 Cups water, or which is much better, 3 Cups vegetable broth

Bring to a boil, cover, and simmer over low heat for 7 to 10 minutes. Then add:

2 additional cups water or broth
1 small onion, finely chopped
2 medium carrots, thinly sliced
1 large celery stalk, finely chopped
Handfull of finely chopped celery leaves
1 14-oz can chopped tomatoes with liquid (for better yet, make it the tomatoes with chili peppers, like Ro-Tel)
1/2 Cup tomato sauce or tomato juice
1/4 cup dry red wine or sherry
1 Teasp dried basil
1 Teasp paprika
1/2 Teasp dried marjoram
1/2 Teasp dried thyme
Salt and pepper to taste.
Cover and simmer for half an hour or so, until lentils and rice are done.

It is especially splended when made with a can of Ro-Tel tomatoes with chilis, and with a rich vegetable broth…. and you can take the onus of being vegetarian off it by adding about half a pound of kielbasa or other smoked sausage, sliced into rounds, towards the end of the cooking time, and serving it with a little grated cheddar cheese on top. I made it once with imported green lentils from France, and people almost swooned.
And like all really splendid soups, it is even better when warmed over the next day.

28. October 2005 · Comments Off on Rites, Practices and Legends #17: Combat Shopping · Categories: Ain't That America?, General, Military, Veteran's Affairs

The expression “combat shopping” is a wry inside joke in the military family, because there are certain assignments that are well known to be— because of the variety, quality and exoticism of the merchandise, and the comparatively well-paid nature of American military service when compared to local conditions— absolutely a dedicated shopper’s paradise on earth. Even locations where the local exchange rate didn’t particularly favor the American service personnel (most of Western Europe and Japan, in my service lifetime, f’rinstance) there were nice bargains to be had. Size up the local terrain, see the bargain, scoop up the bargain in the neatest and most efficient manner possible; the essence of combat shopping.

At an assignment in Germany, or Italy, or Spain, one was always able to buy locally some attractive and comparatively inexpensive something or other that would cost four or five times as much, back in the good old US of A. (Taking the Williams-Sonoma catalogue as my guide, I could buy an astonishing number of items from it at the Al Campo supermarket, Spain’s answer to Walmart, for about a fifth of the price.) One wouldn’t even have to take a trip to load up on the souvenirs, either: the AAFES Catalogue featured a large assortment of tat.

For exuberantly bad taste, though, the AAFES catalogue paled next to an emporium like Harrys’ of K’Town (Kaiserslautern, to the uninitiated.) Harrys’ stocked elaborate, ornately decorated beer steins as tall as I am, and candles not much shorter, and cuckoo-clocks the like of which had to be seen to be disbelieved. The cuckoo-clock industry in Southern Germany apparently depended almost entirely on sales to tourists: locals had too much good taste to buy such monstrosities. (Although not to much good taste to avoid marzipan pigs crapping gold coins. The good taste thing is probably relative, I think.) Harrys’ memorably featured a cuckoo clock as large as a garden shed, with life-size deer and clusters of dead, turkey-sized doves. You’d need a living room as big as a football stadium to carry it off, and the cuckoo calling the hours was probably audible in the next county. I gave pass to cuckoo clocks, by the way. I bought Steiffel stuffed animals for my daughter, instead.

The base tourism office in Spain were always scheduling day tours to places like Muel— for the pottery, and to the Lladro factory, down near Barcelona, or more extensive excursions to Turkey… Turkey, like Korea in the Far East being The One Place to indulge in serious and prolonged retail therapy. People came back from Turkey with carpets, and brass-work, and gold: from Korea with bespoke clothes, antique furniture and jewelry. Our houses are marked and furnished with unusual items gleaned from tours and TDYs to distant and exotic foreign places. One can almost tell were we have been by looking carefully at the décor… or what we have given to our family as Christmas presents over the years.

And sometimes the phrase “combat shopping” is not entirely a joke: while traveling in a convoy from Kuwait up into Iraq shortly after the liberation, my daughter swapped some MREs for a couple of small rugs from an Iraqi vendor setting up shop along the roadside. Cpl. Blondie was teased by her friends for weeks, for being able to find something to buy, in the middle of a war zone.

28. October 2005 · Comments Off on Funerals and Family · Categories: General

So I’m kinda busy. Not happy. Trying not to injure in-laws emotionally or physically.

All I’m gonna say without going into details is Beautiful Wife’s family does NOT put the fun into dysfunctional…and they’re not even Irish so I have NO roadmap to follow whatsoever.

27. October 2005 · Comments Off on Are you put off by “Tony Sinclair”? · Categories: General

Well then you really should be by that absolutely repulsive Glenfiddich dude – who seems to be a pathetic Ralph Lauren rip-off.

I don’t get this – Glenfiddich ain’t Tanqueray – we are talking about a premium brand here. Why do they need to resort to such addlebrained marketing tactics?

27. October 2005 · Comments Off on How Personally Poignant… · Categories: General

…At this time: the death of Rosa Parks. And her celebration, in many circles, as “the mother of the civil rights movement.”

As it turns out, I have been working on an article, premised upon the afro-centric view of racism in America, and the general denial of racism in the southwest.

I’ve chosen as my focus for this piece, the case of Mendez v. Westminster – Which preceded Brown v. Board of Education by several years. This has particular gravitas for me, as, while I attended Johnson Intermediate – the site of the Mendez farm, I was never taught about this. Neither have any of my California-schooled contemporaries! In fact, a query with one of my favorite Constitutional scholars – Eugene Volokh of UCLA – got the reply, “never heard of it.” In fact, even the Mendez’ granddaughter had not heard of it, until she studied at UCR.

To date, I want to thank Prof. Vicki Ruiz, of UCI, for her help. It seems there were other cases – Alverez v. Lemon Grove, which preceded Mendez, and others in Texas and Arizona, which followed, which all led up to Brown. I’m working on those now.

I hope to tie this all together under an umbrella of general racism and segregation.

25. October 2005 · Comments Off on Imagination and Will · Categories: General, History, World

Sometime around the middle of the time my daughter and I lived in Athens, the Greek television network broadcast the whole series of “Jewel in the Crown”, and like public broadcasting in many places— strictly rationing their available funds— they did as they usually did with many worthy imported programs. Which is to say, not dubbed into Greek— which was expensive and time-consuming— but with Greek subtitles merely supered over the scenes. My English neighbor, Kyria Penny and I very much wanted to watch this miniseries, which had been played up in the English and American entertainment media, and so she gave me a standing invitation to come over to hers and Georgios’ apartment every Tuesday evening, so we could all watch it, and extract the maximum enjoyment thereby. We could perhaps also make headway with our explanation to Kyrie Georgios on why Sergeant Perron was a gentleman, although an enlisted man, but Colonel Merrick emphatically was not.

On occasion, the Greek broadcasting network screwed up, and the next episode of “Jewel” didn’t air. Penny and I would talk for a while, and Georgios would encourage my daughter to all sorts of rough-housing; pillow fights, mostly. (Blessed with two sons, the Greek ideal, Georgios rather regretted that he and Penny didn’t have a daughter as well.) On those Tuesday nights when “Jewel in the Crown” didn’t air, the Greek network most often substituted something appropriately high-toned, classical and in English. Brought out from their library and dusted off, most likely— the Royal Shakespeare Company, in all their thespian glory. And Penny and Georgios and all I noticed on one of those warm spring evenings, that Blondie was sitting on a cushion on the floor, totally absorbed, wrapped up in one of the Bard’s duller history plays. She was then about four years old— but she was enchanted, bound by a spell of brocaded velvet words, swirling cloaks and slashing swords, glued to the television while we sat talking about other things, drawn in by a spell grown even more lightening-potent over the last 400 years. And it happened, the next time that “Jewel” was pre-empted… it was the RSC again, and Blondie was glued to the television, her concentration adamantine, and almost chillingly adult. I was quite sure she had never seen anything of the sort before, I wasn’t one of those frenetically over-achieving mothers, stuffing culture down the kidlets’ throat. I barely had time and energy enough to be an achieving mother: we hardly watched TV at home, VCRs were barely on the market and her favored bedtime reading was “Asterix and Obelix”, although we had branched out as far as the “Hobbit” and “Lord of the Rings”. No, it was not anything I had done… it must have been something innate in Shakespeare, a spell that has been cast, and drawn them in since Shakespeare himself was a working actor and playwright.

I have recently gotten this book— it’s a book club bennie— and gone as far as the first three or four chapters. It’s a good book, a speculative book by necessity, since we know so very, very little for certain of the real William Shakespeare. The author is dependent on speculation and imagination, much given to assuming that if such and such were happening in the neighborhood of Stratford-upon-Avon in the lifetime of the glove-maker’s son, then he possibly would have known about it, and might have reason to weave it into one of his spell-plays. Did he have a good education… or not? Might he have been a school-teacher? A soldier? A clerk? Might he have been a Catholic sympathizer? Might his marriage been unhappy, his father a drinker… we have no way to know for sure, in ways that would satisfy the strict accountants of history. In fact, many have been the symposia, the experts, the finely honed intellectual authorities who have insisted over the years that the Shakespeare who was the actor, the manager and entrepreneur, the son of a provincial petty-bourgeois, simply could not have written the works attributed to him. Such expert knowledge of statecraft, of law, of international polity, of soldiering and the doings of kings and nobles… no, the tenured experts cry… this could not be the work of any less than an intellectual, highly placed and noble, gifted with the best education, and extensive mileage racked up in the corridors of power! Any number of candidates, better suited in the eyes of these experts to have written the works attributed to Wm. Shakespeare of Stratford are advanced, with any number of imaginative stratagems to account for it all… but every one of them I have read, leaves out the power of imagination itself.

Imagination, which takes us out of ourselves, and into someone else— the common thing all these great experts disregard, as if it were something already cast into disrepute, something useless, of no regard…but it is the major part of the actors’ craft and entirely the part of the writers… that part that is not given up to intelligent research. All those great experts seemed to be saying, when they credit other than Shakespeare, the actor and bourgeois householder of Stratford and London… is that imagination is worthless, null, of no account or aid. It is impossible for a writer to imagine himself, or herself into anything other than what he or she is. One cannot imagine oneself convincingly into another time or place, gender or role in life. Imagination is dead… you are stuck with writing about what you are. How sterile, and how horrible. How pointless and boring—
but that is what the highly-educated would have of us. We must not, under pain of what the academicians judge, imagine what it would be like that it is to be whatever we were born to be.
When I was about 17, or so, I wrote a story for a high school English creative writing class, incorporating an account of a historic event which I couldn’t possibly have witnessed— because I had been born fifteen years after the events I described. But I had done research, and even at 17 I was pretty good at writing description… and I had the imagination. It creeped the hell out of the creative writing teacher. He knew of the events that I had written about, and I had gotten it pretty well right. So, imagining again; what would have prevented a young actor from sloping up to a friend of his, in a tavern someplace, a friend who was a soldier, or a law clerk, a priest or servant in the house of a noble, and saying “Say, I’ve got this thing I’m working on… what d’you say about it? What do you think, how would it work, really?”

Which was the creepy, magical part, the part that academicians and writing teachers cannot fathom… which is how far the intelligent and well-researched imagination can take us. To insist that Shakespeare couldn’t have written Shakespeare, is to deny the power and authority… and even the authenticity of imagination.

Which may explain the relative shittiness of novels written by all but the most deviant of academics. Education— all very nice, but nothing will take a writer farther than imagination and some good contacts in other fields. Imagination… it’s what we have that separates us from the beasts. Never underestimate it, use it what you must. Especially when it’s necessary to get out of what you are, and see through the eyes of someone else.

25. October 2005 · Comments Off on Er, I’m back…. · Categories: General

Probably nobody missed my , uh, comments, but I just got home from a few days at Savannah Memorial Medical Center’s CCU. Yep, last Sat, chest pains, ambulance ride, and four days hooked up to a cardiac monitor. DX: The thumping gizzard still beats…. Had a nice CT scan of the heart, they say it’s working fine….Oh, well. Anyway, keep me in your prayers.

Joe the Herky Bird Fixer

24. October 2005 · Comments Off on What? Another GM Masterpiece? · Categories: General

One the cover of my latest (10/05) Automobile magazine: Soltice Rocks!

24. October 2005 · Comments Off on Leisure Reading · Categories: General

A year or so ago (maybe a little longer, by now), I emailed Sgt Mom, and said “Hey! Since I now have a job (or a job offer), I’m ready to make good on my promise to buy your book.”

And Mom, in her usual organized fashion, waited for my paypal to arrive, and promptly mailed out an autographed copy of her memoirs, which I, in my usual unorganized fashion, immediately put in a “safe place.”

In my vocabulary, saying something is in “a safe place” means that I’ve utterly forgotten where I stored it for safe-keeping (the current situation with 2 rebate checks -oops). So for almost a year (or a little over a year), I’ve lived my life occasionally thinking “Sure wish I knew where Sgt Mom’s book is.. I bet it would be good airplane reading.” It was probably more than “occasionally,” since everytime I open sgtstryker.com her blog-ad is right there in front of me, the first item on the page to load when I’m on a slow connection.

Last week, in the midst of a 15-minute cleaning frenzy, I sorted through a pile of old mail on the overstuffed chair in the spare bedroom, and found a padded envelope from San Antonio, still safely sealed.

I immediately transferred the magnum opus to a TRULY safe place – my travel backpack, and it has traveled with me to NJ, and is currently enroute with me to MO. I’m only about 20 pages into it as yet, since I want to give it my best attention, but I am THOROUGHLY enjoying the read.

Memoirs are a tricky business… what we think is hilarious can fall flat in the re-telling, leaving the reader or listener with that annoying sense of “guess you had to be there.” This has not been the case with Mom’s book.

Her memories slightly pre-date mine, and we’re from different parts of the country and different educational strata, parent-wise, but the similarities are there, and her memories serve as springboards for my own. Her family photos, reproduced in the book, bring memories of my own family’s photos. And her flowing text leaves me wondering if I could write my own memories as entertainingly as she writes hers.

Most importantly, and this is a huge thing for me, when reading a memoir, I find myself mentally talking to the pages as I read, as if I were having a conversation with her, instead of merely reading dry words on a page.

Well done, Mom!

I’m ever so glad I decided to buy your book, and even more glad that I’ve retrieved it from its safe place.

24. October 2005 · Comments Off on Just Another Movie Trivia Moment · Categories: Ain't That America?, General, General Nonsense, That's Entertainment!

So, in what movie does the following line of dialogue appear? (No fair googling)

“…The kidnapper yelled “greetings!”, and melted his lug-wrench…”

23. October 2005 · Comments Off on EeK!!!! Nationwide, 100 People Die Every Year!!! · Categories: General

What is it – a national hiccup pandemic? No!!!! it’s that insidious evil – street racing!!!!!

And, of course, the cops are calling for “tough new laws” to “bring this problem under control.” And what do they want most? property seizure! Of course, it has worked so well with drugs, gambling, whatever. But mostly, it gives the cops MORE MONEY – so they can protect us better!!!!

Let’s think clearly here: If only 100 people per year have died as a result of organized street racing – just think of how many more would have perished, had they been doing the same thing in an unorganized manner?!?!?

Don’t think I’m giving a blanket endorsement to street racing here – I very much prefer taking it to the tracks. But, when that is not an easy option, well organized street racing is far preferable to unorganized street racing. In fact, properly done, it turns the streets into a track – much like Long Beach or Monaco – albeit without government imprimatur.

But, of course, that government imprimatur is the all-important factor.

BIG WILLIE AND THE BROTHERHOOD FOREVER!