How exactly are we supposed to take the folks seriously who say, “I don’t have an answer for terrorism, but Bush is wrong?”

It’s a long held principle in the military that unless you have a better answer, it’s best to not complain about “the way things are.” Usually when that happens, the complaining party gets told, “Fine, you don’t like it, fix it.”

Hope is not a plan. Diplomacy historically has simply given the enemy, terrorists, time to resupply and recruit.

If the Bush Administration is wrong? What’s right?