20. May 2005 · Comments Off on At the Movies: The Great Adventure · Categories: General, History, Media Matters Not

(Part 2, of the story I would like to see as the epic movie I wish they would make, but probably won’t)

In the year 1844, these United States, for all intents and purposes, extended from the Atlantic seaboard to the Mississippi/Missouri River. And west of the rivers, two-thirds of the continental territories theoretically American were an unknown quantity. Desert, high plains, mountains, rivers… only a bare handful of explorers, missionaries and fur trappers had ever seen for sure what lay beyond the jumping-off point at Council Bluffs, Independence, St. Joseph. There was a slender and perilous established overland trail to Santa Fe, and beyond that to the thinly-populated enclave of Spanish and then Mexican territories in California. That trail wound through the scrub and deserts of the Southwest, traveled mostly by professional traders and merchants, heavily armed and escorting great lumbering Conestoga wagons packed with profitable trade goods: fabrics and glass, gunpowder and tools, for the markets in Santa Fe, and the outlaying pueblos. They were businessmen, with little interest in lingering, since most of the route lay though desert.

There was another trail, also— a northern track which followed along the Platte River, through deserts and mountains, and eventually terminated in Oregon. Lewis and Clarke, the fur-trapping brigades… all had gone that way, by boat, on horseback and on foot. Hearing of the rich lands in the Pacific Northwest, farmers and small tradesmen had begun to follow the siren call, also. An agricultural depression, epidemics of malaria and yellow-fever, a bit of manifest destiny, ambition and just plain restlessness no doubt played a part.

Families across what is now the middle-west sold off land and assets; this was not a journey for the impoverished, or the reckless. Aside from a wagon, and stock to pull it, these adventurers would have to bring along supplies for six months, tools, clothes, bedding and cooking gear, spare parts for the wagon, perhaps seeds and roots to plant a new garden in the Willamette Valley, or by Sutter’s Fort in far California. There might be some little space in the wagon for some books, and china and other small treasures, for the wagons were small, and food took up most of the space. The larger wagons, purpose-built for the trail were about four feet wide, ten to twelve feet long, covered with waterproofed canvas, spread over four or five arched hickory bows, although many families made do with ordinary farm wagons, fitted out with a cover. The draft animal of choice was not the horse, as many would think. Horses were expensive, and the road was rough, too rough in the early days for even the toughest horse in dray harness. Mules made a good showing on the southern trail, but they were expensive. Most emigrants could better afford ox teams; four to six pair to a wagon, patient and plodding, guided by a driver who walked by the lead team and shouted verbal commands.

The wagons rolled on metal-tired wheels; there was no suspension system, no springs. Most emigrants walked, by choice, rather than endure jolting along in a wagon. It would take six months, easily… and in the early days there was no known road, and only two or three outposts all along that way to buy additional supplies, or to mail a letter. The pioneers looked out from the noisy clamor of St. Joseph, and Independence, and Council Bluffs, at last years tracks and ruts, overgrown with the new grass that would feed their ox teams on the first part of the journey, as soon as it was grown tall enough… at wilderness. They would step off the safe perch, on the riverbank at the edge of civilization, and swing out like a trapeze artist across the vast, emptiness, guided by their own good sense, and hard work, faith and hope and no little amount of luck… but they would not go alone. Late in of May, 1844 such a party of emigrants stepped off from Council Bluffs, in company with a larger party bound for Oregon. Ten families, with as many (or a few more) wagons, with all their stock and worldly goods had elected an ex-trapper and blacksmith named Elisha Stephens as their own leader, and intended to strike off the established trail at Fort Hall, and head for California.

All the other archetypal western stories are almost exclusively male domains. The writer of a romantic yard about cowboys and the open range, the Gold Rush, the mountain men, or the fighting cavalry, must go to great length to import an adventurous school-marm or a tart. But the emigrant wagon trains, the great Mormon migration, and the post-Civil War homesteaders, they were all family matters. Stephen’s party of fifty souls included eight women and fifteen children. A little under half of them were an extended clan: Martin Murphy, and his three sons, with their wives and children. Martin Murphy himself had emigrated from Ireland, to Canada, and then to Missouri. His wife and three grandchildren had died in a malaria epidemic; the clan sought a healthier climate, and Martin Murphy thought all the better of California— still held by Mexico— for it being nominally a Catholic country. Dr. John Townsend, very possibly the most educated person in the party, also looked to a healthier climate; his wife, Elizabeth was supposed to be in frail health. Elizabeth Townsend’s orphaned younger brother, Moses Schallenberger, counted as a man for this journey, at the age of 17. The teenaged half-Indian sons of Caleb Greenwood probably also counted as men. Caleb Greenwood had roamed all over the Rockies as a fur-trapper, twenty years before. Greenwood was thought to be in his eighties, but still hale and vigorous. Another old mountain-man, Isaac Hitchcock also felt the lure of the west, traveling with his oldest daughter and her children.

None of these men; Stephens, Greenwood or Hitchock had been all along the trail to California, although it is thought that Stephens may have had been on the Santa Fe Trail. He seems also to have been enormously respected by the other men; there were none of the bitter divisions that fractured other parties, under the stress of moving the heavy-laden wagons an inexorable fifteen miles a day, and chivvying the stock herd, finding water and safe pasturage, of being dusty and exhausted and hungry, day after grinding day, and knowing that the hardest part of the journey was at the end of it.

(Next: On the Trail)

19. May 2005 · Comments Off on The Appointment-Setter’s Lament · Categories: Domestic, General, Military

(Frequent commenter J.S. Allison sent this, to be posted whenever… enjoy!— Sgt. Mom)

I work in central appointments for a military medical treatment facility and I’m tired. How tired? Let me list the ways:

1. Cell phones are wonderful; the microphones are so sensitive that I can hear everyone and everything within 100 feet of you when you call. Yes, I can tell that you’re in the bathroom, I’d really rather not.

2. Put down the Gameboy while you’re on the phone. At least pretend that this transaction actually matters to you. You called us, remember?

3. Put down the kid while you’re on the phone, especially if it’s screaming. It’s not going to get the kid in any sooner. See #1 above.

4. Multi-tasking is a myth. You’re not equipped to pull it off so stop it.

5. I generally will have somewhere between 5-12 people on queue waiting for me to help them during busy times, so make it march. I’m not being rude, I just realize that there are folk waiting that possibly actually need help so I’m going to try to move the call along as much as practical.

6. If you don’t know why you’re calling, hang up. Better yet, don’t call. I’m not psychic. I’m not taking a test, so spell it out.

7. You called us. That implies that you want something. Making it easier to help you gets you helped, making it harder gets you hung up on on my bad days and definitely reduces any inclination I might have to flexibility.

8. After spending several minutes going on about how desperately your child needs to be seen right away, do not, *DO NOT* ask me for a later appointment because your child is napping, or still in school and you don’t want to get them out. You don’t want to hear what you’ll be hearing next. And no, I won’t get fired over it. Can you say tenure? I knew you could.

9. There are only so many appointments available per day per doctor that are after school. Everybody else wants them too. Don’t expect them to still be available at 2 p.m.

10. I really don’t care that the 0720 appointment is inconvenient, set your alarm. I have to wake up at 0530 every day to get to work on time, how convenient is that?

11. You are the parent, pick the kid up, put it in the carrier, and bring it in. If it’s a self-propelled model you’re still the parent and are potentially bigger and meaner than the kid, bring it in.

12. Don’t delay the treatment of one or more of your kids so you can bring in the whole litter all at once. Oh yeah, on that whole bringing in the whole litter thing, bring another adult to keep an eye on the kids that aren’t being seen. Better yet, leave them home with said adult.

13. On the subject of making it easier to help, once you’ve turned down a few appointment times, tell me what times would be acceptable so we can quit wasting time with twenty questions, better yet, tell me from the outset.

14. This is a military medical treatment facility. As such the first priority goes to active duty military. This isn’t an issue in pediatrics (though it seems it ought to be at times…). However, in the specialty clinics, once the active duty population has been taken care of, dependents and retirees on TRICARE Prime (and other variants who are also paying a quarterly premium) have next call on available resources. Everyone else (who are not paying any premium, btw) get to pick over what’s left. Sorry, but that’s how it is. If you’re not willing to cough up for the Prime premiums get used to paying the copay downtown because your chances of being seen on base range from not much to even less depending upon the particular clinic. You can keep calling everyday, you’re not going to annoy me into giving up an appointment, there are no appointments to give and you’re only delaying your treatment.

15. It is frequently the case that after spending a couple of minutes finding and booking an appointment that the caller will, immediately following the final key press to book the appointment, ask if there’s anything later/earlier/tastier/less filling. The grinding you hear through the phone at that point is my dentures as you now want me to undo everything that was just done, and do it over. This happens at least a dozen times a day, if not more. I know, it’s not your fault but after a bunch of these, well…

16. Cussing me out because you feel that I should bend over backwards to benefit you at my expense and I didn’t do so immediately isn’t going to make me inclined to go the extra mile. On some days, I won’t even make it to the end of the call.

17. No, I’m not going to help you sidestep our policies, wink wink nudge nudge, knowwhatImean?

18. You’re the idiot that put the call on the speakerphone, not me.

19. Don’t mumble and lose the streetmeat patois. Offhanded slacker jackassery might be way kewl in other venues, but do you really want the people that’ll be tinkering with your body with toxic substances and sharp objects confused?

20. I’m convinced that hospitals should provide prospective parents with lists of names that they can choose from for their spawn, including instructions on how to spell them. Parents that saddle their spawn with unpronounceable, unspellable, misspelled, faux-ethnic names should be publicly flogged. If your child wants to make some anti-societal statement with his name, let him do it on his own, don’t saddle the poor little beggar with it when he’s too young to know what’s going on. And if it’s you that has issues, jerk your name around, not your kid’s.

21. TRICARE assigns you to a primary care manager. I will try to match you up with your caregiver’s available appointments first, then move on to other available providers in order that you be seen expeditiously. If you hate your caregiver’s guts, call TRICARE and have your PCM changed. As long as a caregiver is listed as your primary, that’s who I’m going to try to book you with first. Them’s the rules.

22. If you just can’t tolerate that you have a male caregiver, call TRICARE and have it changed. You may find yourself having to be seen offbase as there just aren’t that many wymyn providers round these parts. In any event, I don’t care, talk to the hand. I understand that in certain situations having a provider of a particular gender can be uncomfortable for that particular situation and we do try to work with these issues, but the blanket whining about all wymym all the time is quite tiresome, get over it, and yourself.

23. Just because you don’t have to pay for care, doesn’t mean that it’s worthless. A history of no-shows will get you barred from the facility as you’re preventing other folk from being seen by jerking the facility around.

24. This is the appointment desk, just tell me who you are and what you need to be seen for, I can take it from there. Save the history for your visit, I can’t do anything with it and you’re just extending the call.

25. If it’s an emergency, why are you calling me? Can you say 911?

19. May 2005 · Comments Off on Memo: Not the Ladies’ Auxiliary · Categories: General, GWOT, Military

To: The Senate Armed Forces Committee
From: Sgt Mom
Re: Military Women & Combat Support

1. My dear ladies and gentlemen, at this point is a little late to be coaxing the horse of “No Women in Combat!” back into the barn and locking the door. This would require the military to reverse nearly thirty years of placing military women— who are volunteers, mark you— in specialties which do not permit them to go out deliberately looking for combat, but which do put them out where combat might, in theory, come looking for them. This was a great change from the previous system, in which military women were stationed either in the continental United States performing various support functions a long, long way from what was clearly understood to be the front, or as nurses and clerks in a handful of rear-echelon areas where it was devotedly hoped that in case of defeat and capture that the Geneva Convention and the enemies’ chivalric sensibilities would afford some kind of protection.

2. Alas, only one country that we have fought since 1941 has given more than lip service for the Geneva Convention, the forces of militant Islam would appear to have about as much use for traditional chivalry as Orky the Killer Whale has for a stair step machine, and it is abundantly clear that in this war, there is no front line, there is no safe area. When an enemy can take a clear shot at the Pentagon, and kill civil servants sitting quietly at their desk jobs— well, that should make it pretty clear that there is no rear in which to park the gear and the ladies’ auxiliary safely out of harms’ way… even if going back to the old way were still even possible.

3. Many of the necessary combat-support jobs in this war are being done by soldiers, airmen, sailors and Marines who just happen to be of the female persuasion. They have volunteered for the military, they have trained to do their jobs, they have been leaders, supervisors, commanders, and as such they are essential. As professionals, I am sure that most of them had a pretty good idea of what they were getting into… and for those who didn’t the ambush of a certain Army maintenance unit convoy in 2003 served as a wake-up call. This for real, and this is for keeps, and those who do not have a sword may still die upon one.

4. I would agree that seeing the mothers of small children coming back from Iraq in a coffin is a heartbreaking prospect; so are the accounts and pictures of military women who have lost limbs, been horribly scarred, who have been injured and face a long recovery… but how can it be any less horrible for the mothers of sons to face the same? We all hold a stake in this; we are all at war, no matter where we might be, and no matter if it is a son or a daughter, a wife or a husband serving. Please don’t patronize us by deciding that one or the other of them should be protected right out of what they are doing in our service. Do what you can to see that every soldier, sailor, airman and Marine has what they ought to have, now and in the future to do what they need to do.

5. Finally, I derive a great deal of mental satisfaction in imagining a particularly odious Baathist— perhaps one of Saddam Hussein’s official rapists— or an especially misogynist Al-Quaida operative being cuffed by a female SP, or tapped at a good distance by an expertly shooting woman Marine. I would ask rather that you do what you can to see that this happens… soon and often.

Sincerely
Sgt. Mom

18. May 2005 · Comments Off on In Your Dreams @ the Movies! · Categories: General, History, Media Matters Not

The beginning of the summer movie season has already begun, with every other movie doing their level best to avoid being trampled into a microscopically thin layer of celluloid paste under the hooves of the mighty Star Wars behemoth. There seems to be no middle ground in discussions of “Hitchhikers’ Guide”; everyone either loved it or hated it. So far, the cruelest, and most succinct take on Sir Ridley Scotts’ Crusade clunker has been “The Kingdom of Heave”— richly deserved for irredeemable presentism as regards religious attitudes, historical personages, and heroically sucking up to CAIR. Hollywood loves those crazy-brave idealists who speak truth to power and stick it to the man… but best not even think of sticking it cinematically to anyone who might slap a fatwa on their ass or send a car bomb into Morton’s’.

One historically-minded enthusiast lamented that he had always wanted to see a movie about Baldwin, the Leper-King of Jerusalem— it would have every kind of drama imaginable—- but after “Kingdom of Heave” anyone with the power to green-light such an epic would just shrug and say, “Been done.” Oh, the movies we wish we could see, the TV series we would want to have on the air, but with a couple of honorable exceptions— to which we are fanatically devoted— it’s the same old, same old, and not very daring with it, either. Last week at Rantburg, one of the regulars was pointing out that as long as Hollywood was going back and re-doing old movies and series, what about reviving the 1960ies series “Rat Patrol” and updating it to present-day Iraq or Afghanistan? What a concept— four Special Forces soldiers dashing around the desert, fighting insurgents and blowing up stuff! It would work, and work very well, especially with boys of all ages in the red states, and the Army would fall all over themselves giving assistance to the producer. Alas, there is about as much a chance of that happening, as there is of my own dream movie epic, albeit for different reasons.

Because, you see, hardly anyone has ever heard of this particular party of men, women and children. They blazed a trail in the wilderness, walked nearly three thousand miles, across plain and desert, and finally hauled wagons up a sheer mountain cliff. They set out into country unknown to most, and very possibly all, all for a gamble that life at the other end of the trail would be better. They are a footnote in the history books, going under several different names, because no one was ever entirely sure afterwards who their leader was. They had no diarist, no tireless letter-writer or professional memoirist among them, no extensive first-hand contemporary accounts; they were ordinary people … but on an epic journey.

(To be continued)

17. May 2005 · Comments Off on Site Policy · Categories: General, Site News

Just to make a couple of things absolutely, positively clear, folks:

1. I have only ever banned a commenter from this site once. That person was a particularly charmless and abusive troll, and after I got tired of making fun of it, I went to a great deal of administrative hassle to ban his/her/it’s IP address. It’s a big chore, and frankly I have better things to do.

2. Comments on this site are lightly moderated, mostly because of the incessant drizzle of automated card-game and transsexual p0rn spam posted by some ‘tard who is too cheap to pay for advertising. Comments containing certain words go into the moderation bin until one of us has a chance to review. If your comment doesn’t appear right away, that is where it has gone. It is not personal, and you have not been banned.

3. I don’t care if the discussion gets lively— acrimonious, even. If you dish it out, you should be able to take it and respond in kind. Just keep the flung heavy objects and death threats down to a dull roar, m’kay?

As you were,

Sgt. Mom

16. May 2005 · Comments Off on Attention! · Categories: General, History, Technology

To: All Fans of Vintage Aircraft
From: Sgt Mom
Re: Air Show This Weekend!!!

1. Being that William, the Significant Other, is intensely involved with this, and has been telling me all about it (and other museum projects!) for some weeks, I feel it only fair to help spread the word: This weekend is the annual “Wings of Fame” air show at Chino’s Cal-Aero Field. They will have 24 flying World War II aircraft, including two Zeros and just about every flyable P-47 Thunderbolt in the world, plus many other cool vintage aircraft on display. The Wings of Fame has the largest collection of flyable vintage aircraft on the west coast.

2. Cal-Aero Field is at 7000 Merrill Avenue in Chino, and their website is here, with schedules, maps, lists and pictures of the exhibits… and directions on getting there.

3. Take special note of Williams’ pride and joy, the B-17 Piccadilly Lily: they are fundraising, in order to make it flyable again.

Sincerely,
Sgt Mom

16. May 2005 · Comments Off on Memo: Dead Media Walking · Categories: General, Media Matters Not, sarcasm

To: Various
From: Sgt Mom
Re: Newsweek/Koran Desecration

1. Newsweek writers Michael Isakoff, and John Barry: Sooooo, an unnamed source who thinks he saw something about it, but can’t really pin it down is good enough for a “professional journalist”* to run with? Say, can I get paid for relaying water-cooler gossip and speculation?

2. The unnamed source: Nice going, a**hole. You flapped your lips to a “reporter”* and more than a dozen people are dead, and even more may be in danger.

3. Newsweek editor Mark Whitaker: Ummm, in this age of cable news 24/7, the internet and satellite communications, the purpose of a general weekly dead-tree digest of news and stuff would be— other than to consume so many thousands of acres of wood-pulp, and to save your phony-baloney job— what, exactly? At worst, your take on the news is a week old by the time it hits the newsstand or mailbox. Fresh fish and fresh news go stale at about the same rate… and I don’t buy either, at a week old.
Checked your circulation figures recently?

4. The so-called “Islamic street”: Do you guys ever get tired of being played for saps? Try some exercises in critical thinking, next time someone tells you some wild story. I realize that the 21st century may be a bit of a leap, intellectually, politically, and technologically, but the 19th century would work for us… for choice, the latter half of it. Realize that your actions make it really difficult for the spokesman for CAIR and other American Islamic groups to go on insisting that “Islam is a religion of peace” with a straight face. Some of them must be very close to OD’ing on Botox, by now

5. The Afghani and Pakistani Mullahs: No, we shall not be turning any personnel over to you for desecrating the Koran. Now, you might get the detainee who ripped up a copy and tried to clog a toilet with it— does that count? In turn, we would like you to turn over to us: The murderers of Nicholas Berg and Daniel Pearl… and those Palestinian cruds who desecrated the Church of the Nativity… plus a number of others to be named at a later date. Thanks for your consideration and attention to this matter

6. DU and the Kos Kiddies: (wow, what a name for an alternative band!) No, the evil US gummint did not force Newsweek to retract their story. Tell you what, I will throw out something for the paranoids to chew on: Just suppose the unnamed source was throwing Isakoff and Barry a totally bogus, BS story, just to mess with their heads, and see if they would be so foolish as to swallow it whole… and look like complete dickheads when it was disproved. How’s that for eeeeevvviiil? Destroy the credibility of mainstream media by feeding them tales which are easily disproved a week later! (Bwahhhh-hahhh-hahhh!) Don’t bother to thank me, kiddies, I live to serve. You want a couple of rolls of paper towels to clean up the mess from all the exploding heads?

7. *As always, those are not “scare” quote marks— they are “viciously skeptical” quote marks.

Sincerely,
Sgt. Mom

13. May 2005 · Comments Off on Thunder and Rain · Categories: Domestic, General

A thunderstorm blew over my house on Sunday, around mid-day. This happens every two or three weeks, at least once a month during a normal spring and summer. Our thunderstorms in South Texas are as outsized as everything else is supposed to be in the west. Sometimes they appear as great creamy mounds of cloud, piling up and up and up in the clear blue sky, the bottom layer as flat and grey as a an iron, pressing down on the land. Out in the high desert, you can see them coming, a long way away, with a grey veil of rain hanging below, and even if the storm is moving away, sometimes you can catch the scent of it on the desert air, a teasing whisper of moisture.

Around here, a thunderstorm sweeping in from the mountains, or up from the Gulf will cover the entire sky; sometimes there is a odd, sepia or greenish cast to the air, until the last of the sunlight winks out. The clouds darken to leaden grey, and press closer, as if twilight is falling in the middle of the day. Lights that are activated by a sensor—streetlights and advertising signs and such— wink on. Sometimes the storm is announced by gusts of wind, but more usually by a distant grumble of thunder.
Storms that come in at night introduce themselves with lightening; one spectacular storm a couple of summers ago lit up the sky constantly for nearly half an hour; nonstop flickering light, etching the trees and the big stone cross at St. Helena’s on the other side of the green belt at the back of my yard in harsh, blue white light. Impossible to count the seconds between the flash and the noise, while gusts of wind lash the tree branches.

The rain announces itself as a faint rustle in the grass and in the tree leaves, pattering in random wet splotches on the stone path. The first few fat drops resound like small pebbles on the fiberglass porch roof, and then the full force sweeps in, and the light pattering becomes a full-throated roar. The porch roof is fringed with silvery streamlets of water, and St. Helena’s and the great stone cross in the field beyond my garden are dim shapes in the veil of rain. The rainwater is cold, or maybe it only seems so, but it feels like the storm has brought a breath of coolness with it. Sometimes the rain brings hail, almost always icy little pellets the size of bee-bees bouncing off hard surfaces. Very occasionally, the hail is larger— marble and golf-ball and baseball sized, and accordingly more dangerous. My neighbor Judy was trying to get some of her potted plants under cover during the hail storm two months ago, and collected a number of bruises on her shoulders and back before she thought better of that plan.

The rain sheets off my neighbor’s roof, overflowing the gutter and splashing into the flowerbed that I have mulched with gravel. My own downspouts are spilling water into the area between our houses, the garden path is awash with it. The street in front of my house runs nearly ankle deep in water after a downpour like this; somehow the this city has never quite got the hang of constructing roads with adequate coving; roads and drains mean pretty much the same thing. To our enormous civic embarrassment it is entirely possible to be swept away and drown within city limits, as the result of driving down certain streets in a heavy rain.

Ten, fifteen, twenty minutes, the downpour is relentless, but then it seems like it is not so dark, the twilight is lifting, and the roar on the patio roof dies away. A few birds chirp uncertainly from where they have taken shelter. A crack of blue sky widens between two clouds, a fan of sunbeams spreads open like the halo of a saint in an El Greco painting, and the storm is gone as swiftly as it arrived. And with luck, there’ll be another one in a couple of weeks, so I’ll not need to water my garden with the hose, and the little white wildflowers that people call rain-lilies will miraculously sprout in a day or so, nickel-sized white hexagons on a green stem, swaying among the uncut grass in the fields and roadsides.

12. May 2005 · Comments Off on Now, That’s Inspired!!! · Categories: General, That's Entertainment!, The Funny

….and very, very warped. This for Timmer and all you other Star Wars Fans. Don’t have your mouth full, when you click on the link.

It’s true, simply everyone who is anyone has a blog, these days.

(Courtesy of Rantburg and Vodkapundit)

12. May 2005 · Comments Off on Random Economic Thought · Categories: Domestic, General

There are three ways of dealing with the challenge of having champagne tastes and a beer budget; aesthetic, artisanal and economic. One can either

Learn to like beer

Learn to make champagne

Drink mineral water on six nights of the week, and champagne on the seventh.

10. May 2005 · Comments Off on Once Upon a Star Wars Movie · Categories: General, Memoir, That's Entertainment!

I am not at all sure I will go the new Star Wars movie; I gave a miss to the last one with no particular regret, since the one before that was such a drear, mechanical and glum experience, bloated with set-piece special effects, and only one remotely amusing moment. (When stranded on wherever it was with all the sand, one of the Jedi made a reference to the Queens’ terribly ornate and extensive wardrobe. Swear to god, people, that was the only time I came close to cracking a smile.) The build-up to it was so terrific, it seemed like every magazine except for a handful of foreign affairs, or animal husbandry publications were pounding away relentlessly with triple sledgehammers: “It’s Star Wars – The Beginning!” (Blam!) “See the beginning of the Empire!” (BLAM!) “Light-sabers! Jedi Knights! Special Effects Up The Whazoo!” (KAH-BLAMMO!!!) I was tired of it, even before seeing the picture – which I did eventually, after willfully and maliciously holding out for about three weekends. I stumbled away from the multiplex with a headache, and a numb behind, although it may have been the other way around. How very far George Lucas had come, how very different that move-going experience was from the very first Star Wars – as if it had really been a long time ago, and in another galaxy.
I was home from technical school at Ft. Benjamin Harrison, when the first Star Wars movie opened in the Los Angeles area. I was fresh from a week with the boyfriend whom I adored, with orders for my first duty station in hand. Japan! What adventure awaited! (Of course, the week with Ted had been pretty adventurous as well.) I had been in the Air Force for six months, and would be away for at least a year, maybe more. My absence had not been long enough for the family to close up ranks and fill in the space where I had been – it was pretty much like it was when I came back from a summer away, and one afternoon JP suggested that we go and see that cool new space movie. There had been a huge, quarter-page ad in the movie section of the LA Times, and an indulgently rapturous review.
“It sounds pretty cool,” said JP, “And different, anyway.”
The only theater it was showing it locally was the Cinerama Dome, down on Sunset Boulevard, which we thought was pretty cool. It had only been a few years since Mom had given up driving over to West Hollywood to the church we had attended for years, below Sunset on Doheny. We knew the way— down into the Valley, over the hills and along Laurel Canyon to Sunset Boulevard, where the Garden of Alla had been, and the Wisky-a-Go-Go and the revolving Myra Breckenridge figure, and the Chateau Marmont— so driving over that well-known route was pretty much a snap. We figured that we would catch an early evening show, and be home a little after midnight, a plan that pretty much dissolved when we actually got there, and discovered that the first evening show was sold out. And so was the mid-evening show – and the line at the box office was for tickets to the late evening show, an excited and enthusiastic crowd, mostly of people our age.
“It’s my only chance to see this,” I said, “Let’s find a phone, and let Mom and Dad know.”

The line for tickets went down Sunset Boulevard to the corner, around the corner, and up to the next corner, eventually meeting up with the line to get into the theater, which started at the door, went down Sunset in the opposite direction, to that corner, etc cetera. After consulting with a couple of mad Star Trek fans in line with us, JP and I made the rational decision that I should stay in line for tickets, and he would go wait in the line to get in. The Star Trek fans made a similar decision. Our lines crawled in opposite directions, all that evening. Did we eat dinner? I don’t think so, we were too excited to be hungry. Triumphantly, the ticket line advanced, around the corner, up to the box office; with a pair of tickets for the last showing of the night in hand, I set off down the sidewalk to where JP waited, still half a block from the door. By the time we get into the theater, we were as excited as we used to be, going to one of the grand old Art Deco picture palaces in Pasadena with Granny Jessie.
Inside the very modern Cinerama Dome, the atmosphere was electric with excitement and anticipation. The lights went dim, and the music came up, and the great letters of the opening titles swam through dark space. We were sucked in, from the very first opening scene, with the fleeing transport shooting back at the Imperial battle cruiser, which grew bigger, bigger, unimaginably huge, the sound of it rattling your heart in your chest. Ahh, that was an exhilarating, dazzling roller-coaster ride of a movie, with all the classical elements, dashes of wit and adventure, of battered technology and strange creatures, bursting with visual creativity, Robin Hood and Buck Rogers and all. JP and I stumbled out of the theater two hours later, feeling like it had only been twenty minutes or so.
“Wow. Just wow.” JP said earnestly. Just wow, indeed. I was off to Japan, in a week or so… where everyone wondered what it was all about, until the movie showed up on the AAFES circuit, six months later. I saw the second part, on a bootleg Beta tape at my daughters’ baby-sitters’ house in mid 1980, and the third part at the AAFES theater at Hellenikon AFB in 1984. It was terrific, each of those times… but nothing ever quite equaled that first time. Don’t tell me why, I already know.

09. May 2005 · Comments Off on Unified Theory of Career Nervousness · Categories: General, Military

My theory, such as it is, is based on the observation that there were certain people in the military who are just ulcer-inducingly, tear-out-your-hair, develop-a-drinking-problem impossible to work for, and that they were concentrated in certain ranks and had accrued a very specific quantity of time in service.

Of course it was pretty likely that some of these people had been pretty much a waste of flesh and stripes/commission from their first day on active duty, but I began to notice, as I accrued TAFMS years myself, that the majority of them were concentrated in the enlisted rank of E-6 (TSgt.) or the officer rank of Major. Given that complete and total dickheads ought to be pretty evenly distributed throughout the ranks, I tried to account for the disproportionate accumulation of them at the rank of Technical Sergeant or Major with eighteen to nineteen years of service. I believe that Sgt. Mom’s Unified Theory of Career Nervousness accounts for this phenomenon.

My theory is predicated upon the fact that a career military member can retire with a somewhat adequate pension at twenty years, but that most enlisted members want very much to retire as an E-7, and that officers want very much to retire as a Colonel. At those ranks, you can stay on past the twenty year mark, but if you have not… oh well. As they say in Moscow, “Tuff shitski, comrade.”. An E-6, or a major with just a year to two to go before that twenty-year cut off, and facing the prospect that making it to the next rank is problematical to impossible… well, that person is very often either sour and embittered or afraid that the least little mark against will screw up the chance they do have of making it to that next magical promotion. The sour and embittered, or the terribly ambitious are not nice people to work for. Three guesses as to whom they will take it out on, and the first two guesses do not count.

Of course, this is not true of all Tech-Sergeants and Majors with that duration of service… and does not address the truly towering horribleness of Colonels who thirst with a desperate longing to pin on that star… but on the whole, I think it works. Discuss, with examples and competing theories, please.

06. May 2005 · Comments Off on Sgt. Mom’s Rulz · Categories: Domestic, General

Now that my daughter has friends who are coping with small children, she has become quite amazingly appreciative of me as a mom. ( Mothers’ Day flowers and a card, and something nice for the garden!) The terrible twos were not all that bad, and she even gracefully managed the terrible teenage stage without any scars on either one of us; although, as she pointed out when we were talking about this— we HAD to get along, because it was just the two of us. No impossible friends, no rebellion, no experimentation with unusual substances, or various infractions of the law… no stormy tantrums, no slammed doors. Quite frankly, I was envied by a number of other parents, and even a prospective parent who was in two minds about what it would be like to raise a child, and wished that it were possible to just clone my daughter.

But I have never been quite sure if I just lucked out, and got a child with a temperament and interests which were compatible with mine, or if it was those few and sensible rules, drawn from my parents’ house rules or from my own experience with smaller children. Someone once made the point that in the old days of large and close families, older children often had to mind the younger sibs or cousins, with the pleasing result that when they came to have their own children, there were no surprises. I had already taken care of my youngest brother, had the neighborhood monopoly on baby-sitting as the only responsible teenage girl for blocks around, worked at summer camps, with Sunday School classes, and as a Scout troop assistant leader. So, very few surprises, and a lot of confidence going in. And I was terrifically pleased by the invention of disposable diapers, by the way. Gift of the gods, people, gift of the gods.

I knew enough not to expect a lot out of a toddler, at least. You might be able to teach a three year old to use the toilet, play Chopin on the piano, and remember her/his manners… but not to count on that, terribly… and not to beat yourself up if you couldn’t. Until the age of about three and a half to four, when they grasp the concept of threats and bribery, what you have is a completely self-centered, impulse-driven little animal. Love them and kept them from running out in traffic, or sticking their fingers into the electrical sockets, and try not to expect too much. Good behavior is pretty much a random, hit or miss proposition. At least, until they are at the stage where you can say “Darling, if you don’t stop that, mother will spank!” or “Darling, if you are an absolute angel, mother will give you some ice cream!”— and they comprehend, and amend their own behavior willingly, you are just not going to get consistently good behavior.

And never make a threat or a promise you have no intention of delivering on. If you aren’t going to follow through, don’t even open your mouth.

You have to be willing to be authoritative, to be a parent, not a pal. If you don’t have their respect when they are small, what chance do you have of it when they are taller than you?

Spanking (never in anger, bare hand on bare butt, for clear infractions of established rules) was hardly ever required after a certain age. I could always come up with a far more suitable, non-physical punishment— forfeiture of allowance, privileges, expiation of guilt, something creative like that.

I worked very hard at never being surprised into anger at anything startling she told me. If you are angry, you will frighten them, and then you will never hear anything again that a child thinks might make you angry. Practice a noncommittal expression, and the useful phrase “Well, that is interesting, sweetie.” Then take a deep breath and rationally deconstruct what they just told you.

I kissed off having any sort of non-child oriented social life for about fifteen years. Your family life, your job, your social life. You can only have two out of three.

And finally, never forget that your child is a seperate and unique human being… not some sort of extension of yourself. They are, and ultimatly, their own person, and as such they may do things that you yourself might never do.

Myself, I would never have enlisted in the Marines, but it’s what my daughter wanted to do.

05. May 2005 · Comments Off on Wild Kingdom! · Categories: Domestic, General

Although my back yard is tiny, a veritable scrap, a pocket-handkerchief of a back yard, it somehow feels much larger, because it backs on a green-belt. There used to be some scrubby trees growing against the other side of the fence, but the city cleared it all away as a fire hazard some years ago. This somewhat inconvenienced the nesting cardinal pair that came back, year after year, and forced them to locate their subsequent nests first in one of my rose bushes which had briefly attempted to become a tree, and then in the tangle of jasmine vines, and finally up in the photina somewhere. Although the nesting area varied, their feeding habits have not: I hear their distinctive squeaking song all throughout the spring, in the morning and early evening, when the feathered traffic around the hanging bird-feeders is greatest. There really isn’t much out of the ordinary, bird-wise; the usual brown sparrows and wrens, great flashy blue-jays— the glam rock-stars of the backyard-bird world— a mocking bird now and again, and a flock of very fat grey doves.

If I wanted to, and it was legal in a suburb, I could hunt the native doves from the back porch; it would only be easier if they actually walked up to the door and committed seppuku on the mat. As it is, not even Bubba and Parfait, the neighbors’ cats that prefer my garden to their own, are not much interested in hunting the birds. Oh, they make a desultory effort now and again; Parfait crouches in the tall fringe of grass and watches the rabble of doves scouting for the spilled seed on the ground under the feeder, but he has yet to even make a good-faith effort at actually stalking them. Bubba, with primitive feline instincts rising irresistibly to the fore, sometimes makes a short dash into their midst, but he has yet to actually catch any of them. I don’t think he really tries very hard; after all, my yard is their gentlemen’s club, a place of leisure and repose. I think they look on the birds as entertainment; Cat Television, the Bird Channel. Neither one of them is dedicated to hunting, or particularly good at it, not like Nimue, the bad outdoor-cat who frequently stalked, slaughtered and ate the tender parts of the doves, leaving the garden strewn with feathers and half-eaten avian corpses. Nimue did know her limits, though— she did not tangle with Wellie the opossum.

Wellie (short for Wellington; among other things the owner and proprietor of a really impressive nose) the opossum waddled up to the back porch one afternoon, drank deeply from the cat’s water dish, and then took his fill from Nimue’s food dish, all while she observed lazily from a sun-warm place on the rock pathway. Then, he calmly waddled across the porch, underneath the chair that I was sitting in, and into the small corner cupboard— an arm’s reach from where I sat— where he curled up among the garden sprayers, containers of plant food and the long loppers and went to sleep. I was never able to decide if he was either completely fearless or as dumb as a box of rock, or come to any good reason— other than a fearsome collection of needle-sharp teeth and claws— why Nimue was quite tolerant about Wellie calmly appropriating her food dish and personal porch. I suspect cats think of opossums as merely another sort of ugly and mutant cat.

Nimue and Wellie have since moved on, but wild life in the garden is burgeoning: the toads come and go, and the lime-sherbet-green lizards inflating their pink throats on the wisteria branches are always there. A couple of evenings ago, I heard something crunching away at the kibble in the cats’ dish, a tiny kitten-sized thing that skittered away and hid among the potted plants when I opened the door. Not the neighbors’ escaped pet ferret again, not like last year, but a miniature Wellie, an opossum-kit with a white face and black ears. Yesterday it was there again, joined by a second, and a third, who crept cautiously down the lattice, or from between the pots. They crunched nervously, sometimes balancing on the edge of the dish. Two of them fled when a hungry dove landed, and stalked up and down with an indignant flaring of tail-feathers and wings, but the third kit kept possession of the dish. The disgruntled dove hopped away off the porch and the two shyer kits crept out from between the pots again, and ate and ate until they were quite full. I assume they are living on the flat porch roof, under the shelter of the main roof overhang, and come and go by the lattice and the wisteria vines. Bubba and Parfait seem to have as little interest in hunting them as Nimue did with Wellie, even though they are very much smaller; presumably the cat-opossum truce still holds. The man at the pet store says he had a semi-tamed one for a while, and they will eagerly eat slugs and snails, which is a good reason to tolerate them, even aside from the fact that they are rather amusing to watch.

I do wish I had a turtle in the garden, though. I have rescued two from various busy streets, but both times I was too far away from the house to take the time to bring either one of them home. I left them both in green pastures, out of the traffic. But a turtle would be cool… the next one I find in the road is coming straight home (even if it makes me late to work) and joining my wild kingdom.

03. May 2005 · Comments Off on In Which We Serve · Categories: General, Military

(Regular commenter “Dex” sent me an e-mail with a link to this conservative blog, and a note about how one particular thread had devolved into a discussion of why people joined the military. As none of the comments were from people who were or had been in the military, or seem to have even known anyone in the military… or even very much about the military to start with, other than the fact that we wear uniforms, and play with guns and high explosives… well, trying to enlighten via my own comment looked pretty fruitless. I will send a link to this, so I can tell Dex I have done my best.)

It is an assumption in some circles at least, that we are mercenaries, doing it for the money. Or at least, the money and the whole package of benefits, which the wicked military recruiters dangle before the poor and gormless rubes who just can’t get any other job. According to the Chablis and Brie intellectual set, this constitutes an economic draft, achieving by those means what used to be accomplished by a draft board, with exemptions for the college-bound and the well-connected. They’re not really volunteering, they just don’t have any better place to go and it’s all the fault of Halliburton/AshKKKroft/the Trilateral Commission/the military industrial complex/Bushhitler/the Teletubbies/time-traveling lizard-creatures, or whatever. Anyone particularly cherishing these beliefs can stop reading right now. The real reasons people join the military are much more complex, much more mysterious than simple economics, and way above the simple comprehension level of a devotee of conspiracy theories, being a mixture of very real human emotions. (Re-adjust the tin-foil hat, return your levels of snobbish superiority to normal operational levels and go away.)

Mind you, for someone who is fresh out of high school and considering the alternatives— fast food, crappy retail sails jobs or low-level manual labor—- the pay and benefits do look pretty good. Not great, not much more than adequate, really, but for a single person living in a barracks, it’s OK. Health care, paid vacation, extra pay, BX/PX, the commissary, educational benefits, and various allowances… at entry-level, it compares very favorably to your average crappy sales job. Although, once, as an E-4, I sat down and worked out that even with pay, separate rats, housing and overseas allowance, with the hours in my duty schedule, on an hourly basis it worked out to about as much as the fruit-pickers were then on strike for. Even with promotions, and increased allowances, for most military it is never quite as much as they would have been paid on the outside for the same skills and experience. No, it’s not the money. People who enlist for the money are usually pretty disappointed.

The second justification for enlisting is… basically, boredom with a dead-end life in a small town, or a big-city project. Well, for them, it’s boredom; for people who have the resources to enable them to become bored in the Marin suburbs or upper-east side condo, it would be called a yearning for adventure, or to challenge yourself, or to just get a life. Joining the military is certainly the fastest and most efficient way to get a life… and a life as different as the one that you were insufficiently interested/challenged by as it could possibly be. I would put more credit in the second justification, actually… the fact that to someone looking for thrills and adventure, nothing short of the circus or white-water rafting can deliver highs quite like the military. There are people who only feel alive when they are hanging out there, risking it all, with lots of engine noise. And to live at the business-end of America’s defense sword, to be at the very top of your game, with your teammates… for some, that is living life at full throttle. For those people, everything short of it seems like a half-life, sleepwalking through existence. Even those of us more sensible of risk are not immune to the thrill of just doing a good job, of meeting a challenge with confidence, thanks to the solid teamwork of which you are an integral part.

I also had a theory that post-draft, military service is a family thing. In my basic-training flight, about a third of the other women turned in DOD dependents’ ID cards. It is anecdotal, based purely on personal experience, but still… a lot of the young troops serving today, if I am reading the newspapers and blogs correctly, had parents who served in their day. (Consider my daughter, for one, and Rev. Sensings’ son for another.) Growing up in a military family means that joining up yourself, is just one of those things you do. You are already open to the realistic possibilities, anyway. This may be something even more marked in various reserve units: in all the reporting about various activated reserve units participating in Gulf War I, the military Times used to note the occurrence of units containing several generations: fathers, mothers, sons and daughters, brothers and sisters, husbands and wives all in the same unit and deployed together.

Even in peacetime the feeling of obligation to serve may just be felt a little more powerfully, when it is a family or community thing. Wartime just ratchets up that feeling to a new level. No one who enlisted after 9/11 could possibly delude themselves about what the military was for, and what it might involve… or about how fragile our lives and very safety could be. I myself enlisted after two years of working with refugees; some of my motivation was boredom, and some was wanderlust, but the largest part was the cast-iron conviction that no one I loved should ever, ever have to leave home and country, cast out by an enemy to live as a rootless refugee, dependent on chance and charity. I would think those who enlisted after 9/11 have similar feelings about never wanting to see people jump from tall burning buildings, not if it something that by their service can be prevented.

(Add your own motivation, or expand upon these, in comments.)

30. April 2005 · Comments Off on Saigon and Cinnamon · Categories: General, History

Thirty years ago this weekend, Mom and I were in the supermarket, and in the aisle with the flour and sugar and baking supplies and spices, I took a bottle off the shelf of Schilling brand spices, a cylindrical glass bottle with the light green plastic cap and green and gold label.
“I wonder how much longer we are going to see this?” I showed it to Mom. The label said ‘Cinnamon’ and in smaller letters “Saigon.”Mom looked at it thoughtfully, and said,
“Get three. We’d better stock up.”
Cinnamon was the only consumer good that we knew of that came out of South Vietnam, and as of the cruel month of April, 1975, there would probably be no more of it.

The North Vietnamese had overrun and taken all of the South. The last helicopter had taken off from the room of the American Embassy, and the newspaper was full of pictures, pictures of frantic people mobbing the gates, crammed into boats, thousands, hundreds of thousands of desperate people, pleading for rescue, for shelter, for succor. Their city was gone, their country was gone. There would be no more jars of “Cinnamon-Saigon” on the grocery store shelves. The war was over, but not the responsibility that seemed to hang- for some people – like an albatross around our necks.

We owed them, and for two years, I got used to taking off my shoes upon entering a home and the arrhythmical sound of English as spoken by Vietnamese, with no ‘f’ or ‘th’ sound and a ‘p’ roughly inserted instead, and a dash of pungent fish sauce on rice and into practically everything else, and small children forgetting that I did not understand Vietnamese and jabbering away at me anyway, and the crackly-crisp texture of spring rolls – a crust like deep-fried tissue paper, but not a drop of oil in the inside, vegetables and bean threads and little bits of pork sausage, and Grandmothers’ vegetable pickles – oh, yes, I may not know Vietnam, but I know the Vietnamese Diaspora. That Diaspora that somehow barely merits a mention on NPR on the occasion of this anniversary; some news reports have mentioned the fact that 2 million Vietnamese decamped in 1975 and the years following, but in all the stories on this solemn occasion I do not hear any of the stories I heard thirty years ago, or any hint of the terror that impelled people like my parent’s foster-son, or my friends Xuan-an and Hai Tran to leave everything – and run.

I am not hearing retellings of the account of the last commercial flight out of Danang, a flight which was mobbed by Vietnamese so desperate that they clawed and trampled each other for a chance to climb onto the rear air-stair of an airliner that didn’t even dare stop, but taxied up and down the ramp with a mob stampeding after it… I am not hearing any accounts of the USS Hancock, where helicopters were landing so thick and fast it was all they could do to empty out refugees and shove the helicopter overboard because there were two – three – four more helicopters hovering and desperate to land, each crammed full of desperate people. What of the USS Pioneer Contender, where Hai and Xuan-An, and her brother and all their families, and the families of the crew of a coastal patrol launch found brief refuge, at the edge of international waters? What of Hau, the Vietnamese AF mechanic- on a cargo plane which took refuge in Thailand, crammed with Viet Air Force personnel, or Bien, the youngest son of a well-to-do family, who somehow wrangled a visa and way out for him and him alone, so at least one of their blood could be safe, somewhere in the world?

Why are there no stories on NPR about how there was hardly a Vietnamese-American community before 1975, only a scattering of Vietnamese women who had married American men? At a community resettlement committee picnic, to which all the local committees had brought together all the refugees they had taken on responsibility for – and any other resident Vietnamese, as advertised in the local paper – the wife of an American contractor confessed to Xuan-an that she had been reticent to get in touch with any of the refugees until then. She was afraid she would be stigmatized as a former b-girl, or a whore; in fact, she had been a perfectly respectable secretary of a contracting firm in Saigon, and had married her husband with the blessings of her family. Xuan-an teared up and hugged her and said that there was no more any of that, they were now all the same; hopeful refugees in a new land.

I think it was this woman’s husband, who was legendary in the refugee community, who had gone back to Saigon in that cruel April, to bring out her mother and father. If they had a sponsor, they could get a visa, they could leave, so he went personally to fetch them away. He did get the parents out, but he also pledged to sponsor all of her sisters and brothers – and their families – and the families of his in-laws – immediate neighbors – and six or seven strangers whom he took on in passing, to the tune of eighty-plus individuals, brands spared from the expected holocaust. The only individual to equal that was the Baptist Vietnamese minister, proprietor of the only Vietnamese restaurant in the San Fernando Valley, and possibly the whole Los Angeles area at that time. It was in a bare-bones and otherwise undistinguishable strip-mall, but it was a restaurant six days of the week, and on the seventh, a church – the cash register perched awkwardly on top of the piano, but Xuan-An’s mother, Grandmother respected him enormously, because he was truly a good and devout man— he was sponsoring other refugees right and left, giving them jobs in the restaurant and setting up dorms in the rooms above. Grandmother was herself a devout Buddhist, and a highly respected arbiter of such matters; as an elder whose immediate family had all managed to escape, she was rather envied by the other elders� most of whom had been carried away because their adult children insisted on it.

Yes, the Vietnamese community in Los Angeles — and a good few other places — sprung into existence almost instantly as these things go, after 1975. This is the story I am not hearing on NPR or in other mainstream news venues, a story I know happened because I was there. I wonder why? The thought occurs to me that it may be that the exodus of all those thousands might be seen as a reproach. All those people on crowded boats and helicopters, all those people mobbing the Embassy, passing their children over the bars, or getting them onto the orphan flights. It is a reproach, a criticism – even a condemnation of all of those who urged the abandonment of a bad war in a bad place. Every Chablis-and-Brie anti-war intellectual, every campus protestor, every Chomsky-fellow-traveler, every fading movie star or rising politician glomming on to the trendy political position, every bureaucrat with second thoughts about actions they had themselves urged on – they had a hand in pulling the plug on South Vietnam. They have no interest in the stories of people like Xuan-an, and Hai, and Kiet and Bien, and Grandmother, the guy who went to get his in-laws and returned with eighty other people, and those thousands of other Vietnamese in the great Diaspora? Oh, no, taking account of the stories would mean accepting the responsibility for putting them into the boats, and sending them into exile. We can’t have that, can we?

28. April 2005 · Comments Off on Memo: Useful Excercise · Categories: General, History

To: NPR
From: Sgt Mom
Re: Flogging a Dead Horse

1. I have been listening to the broadcast series, visiting Vietnam on the occasion of the 30-year anniversary of the fall of Saigon to the North, which has been airing this week on Morning Edition: a very interesting and evocative series, touching on many aspects and lives and experiences.

2. However… and this is the big however, it looks like tomorrow you plan to take a break from vigorously flogging the dead horse of Abu Graib, to take a couple of manly thwacks at the even more defunct equine corpse of My Lai. Well, fair enough, it did happen, it’s a part of the very sad history of the wars in South-East Asia, but I was rather grimly amused at how your reporter, in visiting the old Imperial City of Hue expended only a sentence or two on the massacre of civilians committed by the Viet Cong during their brief occupation of the city in 1968.

3. In other words, a systematic, purposeful selection, execution and secret burial of at least 2,300 civilians is just one of those embarrassing little things that it would be best not to mention very much, not if you want to keep your news access, old boy. How nice to know that NPR is following where Eason Jordan led editorially and selectively, in keeping a CNN bureau in Baghdad. Must not say anything rude about executions, enemies’ lists, and mass graves, old chap… it’s just their way of doing things.

4. Well, at this point, it’s all very much ancient history, but it is quite charming how NPR is managing to avoid much reminiscence about the tidal-wave of South Vietnamese refugees, fleeing their country on anything that would fly, roll or float, or even giving an audience born after 1975 any idea of the fear that those refugees had of the Viet Cong and the North Vietnamese. They were fairly sure that they would be treated like those civilians in Hue, served out with a bullet and a muddy mass grave, and so preferred to take their chances. I am sure you will mention something about mobs surrounding the American Embassy, and the baby lifts, and how desperate South Vietnamese citizens were to escape the long knives of the North, sometime before the week 1s out.

5. Funny how many Vietnamese ended up in America, isn’t it… you’d think after My Lai, they’d have figured out who their friends really were.

Sincerely,
Sgt Mom

(More Vietnam materiel, from the archives, here and here)

28. April 2005 · Comments Off on Old Pictures: Smuggled Out · Categories: General, History

1943 Toul Cemetery

Some time later, this picture was smuggled out of Occupied France, and circulated among the families, the picture that hung for years in Granny Jessie’s house: four graves piled lavishly with expensive chrysanthemums, the names of Menaul and Dodge clear, if mis-spelled, Butterfield partially visible on the far left, and ‘un-known American’ — Buonarobo, whose body was not identified for certain until after the war. According to Army records, the German authorities brought the bodies to Toul after the crash, for burial in the military quarter of the cemetery. It was a bitter comfort to the families: one mother wrote to Granny Jessie, “At least it is good to know that our boys had a decent burial. I had often wondered. I have had three close friends lately hit by this wicked war— two killed and one missing. I think that our boys and maybe ourselves are better off than a lot of people, as we know that nothing can hurt our boys again, and we can have what peace we can and not worry any more, but I would give my soul to have my boy come walking in.”

The notations in the Army Mortuary records gave me a clue to the riddle of who had taken the picture of the grave: Granny Jessie had vaguely alluded to the Red Cross, but James Festa had told me it had been smuggled out of France through the Resistance, and that it had been shown to the internees, that it was the first they had heard of what happened to Lt. Dodge. The four crewmen buried in Toul were the only Americans recovered from there by mortuary affairs personnel after the war. Two of the survivors were hidden there. I thought it very likely that somewhere in a medium to small-sized town which had been a node on an escape line, there was someone who whom the crash of an American bomber nearby was a significant and memorable event. Since the picture was smuggled out through a Resistance escape line, and I knew such a line operated in Toul, it seemed a logical assumption that someone involved in the Resistance in Toul must therefore have taken the picture. In the spirit of someone throwing a bottle with a note in it into the sea, I wrote to the Mayor of Toul, enclosing a copy of the picture, and asking if the Mayor’s office knew anything about the burials in 1943.

Astonishingly enough, they sent me the address of a Pierre Mathy, the same Pierre Mathy who had hidden McClendon and Chandler fifty years before! “My name is Pierre Mathy,” he wrote to me, “and I’m the one who took the picture in Toul Cemetery to show that (we) took care of the American graves, against the will of the Germans. I did not assist in the burial – German soldiers kept people apart while they gathered corpses. I was there at that moment and I started to look for survivors . . . I had established channel to Switzerland with Ms. Suzanne Kriek (called Regina, her Resistance name). She was murdered by the Germans the day before Liberation – she was a Resistance lieutenant; she owned false papers for the Red Cross so she was able to go everywhere. She went to Switzerland about three times a month. An acquaintance of mine was in the Resistance, so I decided to join it . . . I rescued 19 aviators, amongst them 9 Americans, 4 Australians, 4 English and 2 Canadians. . .”

So there it was, out of a pile of old records and letters, a couple of amazing coincidences, the answer to some niggling little questions, and a window into the past, and some reassurance about the qualities of ordinary people in extraordinary times and circumstances. It is gratifying to know that against the odds, in war and occupation, someone would see to the graves of four young strangers, piled with flowers, and take a snapshot to reassure four unknown families, far away. It is reassuring also to discover the courage and fortitude of ordinary people— no headline heroes, no Hollywood spectacle, just people who did what they felt was right and their duty, unflinchingly in the face of odds: Jimmy-Junior and Louis Buonarobo refusing to leave their gun stations, Sherman Dodge and John Chandler staying to the last, conscientious Frank Francis scrounging another set of charts and seeing to the destruction of the classified “G” box, Pierre Mathy and his friends, feeding, hiding and guiding the survivors to safety, and those families at home, whose concern for each other helped them endure separation and grief. Ordinary people all, best remembered by the ordinary rest of us.

I did all this tracking down of survivors and witnesses nearly twelve years ago, and wrote the original account shortly afterwards. I worked together sources as various as the collection of letters written by my uncle in 1943, the letters written to my grandmother by relatives of the other crewmen and friends, various official Army Air Corps reports on the loss of the aircraft, the set of questionnaires completed by Lt. Chandler on the circumstances under which he last saw each of the dead or missing crewmen, another set of files from Army Mortuary Affairs, a collection of rips from the Escape and Evasion Society, interviews with James Festa and James Becker, and picking the brains of such varied experts as Colonel (Ret.) Frank Halm of the 94th BG Memorial Association, and a USAF crash investigator who thoroughly briefed me on exactly how a damaged and abandoned B-17 would impact the ground. Each set of facts, names, and actions fitted together like a jigsaw puzzle, and quite often, a tentative supposition that I had made, would be later confirmed by a witness, or by the record. I was never able to contact any other relatives of the Lonesome Polecat crew; there were, for example, no telephone listings for Butterfield in the entire state of Idaho by 1993. Sgt. Thomas, SSgt. McClendon and Lt. Chandler all survived the war, but their Veterans’ Administration files went into inactive status by the late 1970ies. Chandler and his family made a return trip to Toul, and a reunion with Pierre Mathy sometime in the 1960ies. His return was noted by the local newspaper, and Pierre Mathy’s grandson sent me copies of clippings after Mathy himself died in 1995. I transferred to Korea in 1993, loosing touch with James Festa and James Becker at about that time. Neither of them were in good health, and have since dropped from the rolls of the 94th BG association.
My uncle, Lt. Dodge, Sgt. Buonarobo and Sgt. Butterfield are buried in the American cemetery at St. Avold. Lt. Francis’ family had him brought back after the war, and interred in the VA cemetery at Ft. Bliss, since the military wouldn’t let his remains stay in Flirey. Even the original letters and pictures are gone;Jimmy-junior’s woolen uniform jacket and the Purple Heart all burned in the fire two years ago, although I had meticulously transcribed all the letters and rephotographed the pictures.

“..And all that remains is the faces and the names
Of the wives and the sons and the daughters.” (Gordon Lightfoot, The Wreck of the Edmund Fitzgerald)

26. April 2005 · Comments Off on Old Pictures: Black Thursday · Categories: General, History

(Sgt. James Menaul, taken while on leave before going overseas)

My first letter to the 94th Bomb Group memorial association included a telephone number and address for James Becker. Later I located James Festa simply by calling the information operator for Brooklyn and asking of there were a listing for that name. From those gentlemen, the only then-living survivors of Crew #30, and a stack several inches thick of reports from various government archives, contemporary letters, and interviews with an assortment of special experts , I was able to trace what had happened to the Lonesome Polecat II.

In the second wave of bombers over the ball-bearing factories, they made the target, dropping incendiaries onto the wreckage, when they were hit by anti-aircraft fire. With an engine on fire, they dropped out of the protective formation heading west, and were attacked by German fighters. They were last seen by those who returned to Bury St. Edmunds about sixty miles southwest of Schweinfurt, still heading west under power, still fighting. But in a very short space— about fifteen or twenty minutes, they ran out of luck, ammunition and time.

Sgt. Buonarobo ran out of ammunition first, but refused an order to leave the now-useless ball turret, swinging empty guns to bear on attacking fighters. Lt. Dodge took the “Lonesome Polecat” down to the minimum altitude for a safe parachute dump, trying to discourage fighter attacks from below. Sgt Butterfield was killed at his position at the waist gun, and Jimmy-Junior disabled by a stomach wound, crawled back into the tail compartment and returned fire until struck again, probably mortally. Sgt McLendon and Lt. Dodge were also wounded, to a lesser degree. Flight engineer James Festa, in the top turret with an excellent view all the way around, would only tell me that the aircraft was terribly damaged: the tail section was in shreds and a wing well on fire. Sgt. Thomas, the surviving waist gunner, and SSgt. Mclendon then reported taking Sgt. Buonarobo out of the ball turret, also dead.

The intercom knocked out as well, James Festa never heard an order to jump until Lt. Chandler came back and told him directly to bale out of the crippled aircraft. Lt. Francis went to destroy the “G” box, a receiver which allowed a target to be identified when two beams intersected over it. James Festa, going towards the bomb bay to jump out, was blown out through it by an explosion on or near the craft. To the day I spoke to him he still didn’t know why he wasn’t killed by it. The other survivors jumped, the two pilots Dodge and Chandler together at the last, Dodge saying tersely “So long,” leaving the aircraft to crash two kilometers south of the village of Essey-et-Maiserais, near a country road at about four o’clock in the afternoon. Part of it caught fire. The Germans came at once and kept the curious away, while they gathered up the remaining ammunition and guns, and the bodies of the three gunners.

Lt. Dodge’s body was found later, probably a short distance away. His parachute had not opened. Lt. Chandler himself hit the ground hard, and broke three toes. Lt. Francis’ parachute also failed; he fell into woodlands near Flirey, and his body was not found until six months later. The villagers of Flirey, led by their mayor, defiantly held a funeral mass and buried him in their little cemetery. (After the war, the family wished that he could remain there, where people had been so kind and brave, but the War Department insisted on removal to a military cemetery.)

The survivors were scattered far across Alsace-Lorraine. Sgt. Thomas was captured immediately by the German authorities, but the others were luckier, thanks to Pierre Mathy, the restaurateur and innkeeper of Toul. A week after the crash of the “Lonesome Polecat”, Pierre Mathy received a cryptic message from a local farmer, who had a ‘bag of carrots’ for him. In actuality, Mathy was a Resistant, running an escape line into Switzerland, the farmer was one of his contacts, and the ‘bag of carrots’ was actually SSgt. McClendon, complete with two bullets in his leg. Two doctors in Toul secretly operated to remove them and McClendon was sent down the line to safety. Lt. Chandler crawled westward for three days, finally sheltering in a haystack near a farmhouse. He watched the farmhouse for three days more, waiting to see of Germans or French lived there. Desperation drove him to approach it: again, lucky— the farmer was another of Pierre Mathy’s contacts. Given clothes and false papers, he later wrote his wife that the hardest thing he had to do was cram his broken toes into civilian shoes and not limp as he walked by German soldiers in a small town. James Festa was picked up in the little village of Void, near Nancy, by the local policeman, who gave him clothes and food, and passed him from friend to trustworthy friend, hiding him in the house of a wealthy soap-manufacturer in Verdun, and a houseboat on the river before being smuggled over the border and reunited with the others in Swiss internment.

For months afterwards, stunned and grieving families wrote back and forth, first with dignified condolences, then sharing grief and what information they were able to find out. Mrs. Butterfield wrote stoically, “We can be thankful that they didn’t have to suffer long . . . we have our oldest boy in New Guinea and another boy in England with the 341st Engineers. So you can see we must carry on and be brave as we know not when we will have to face this sorrow again.” Mrs. Chandler, who had given birth to a daughter, two weeks before the “Lonesome Polecats'” first mission, and Mildred Dodge, Lt. Dodge’s mother, coordinated the letter-writing. First, all the ‘boys’ were reported missing. Weeks later, Lt. Dodge, Sgt. Butterfield and Jimmy-junior were reported killed, and Sgt. Thomas a POW. Lt. Francis and Sgt. Buonarobo remained missing until almost the end of the war, a matter of distress among the letter-writers. The four in Switzerland wrote to their families, who promptly wrote to Mrs. Chandler or Mrs. Dodge, who copied extracts and sent them to other families. A picture of the four internees, showing them safe and well, was circulated. Mrs. Dodge, whose grief in fifty-year-old letters was raw and lacerating, sent Granny Jessie a snapshot of her son and herself, taken on his last leave, and Granny Jessie sent one of Jimmy-Junior. They corresponded for years afterwards.

(Sgt. James Menaul, taken while on leave before going overseas)

25. April 2005 · Comments Off on Old Pictures: The Polecat Crew · Categories: General, History

(Standing:Butterfield, Festa, Thomas, Menaul, Buonarobo, McClendon.
Kneeling: Francis, Dodge, Chandler, Becker)

The ten men in this picture assembled in May of 1943 at Ephrata Army Air Base, Washington, a place of which Jimmy-Junior wrote in disgust, “They have me living in a tent, out in somebody’s cow pasture. When we get into a crew, we move into hutments that are bigger than a doghouse, but smaller than a garage. I am the official ‘sound-the-alarm-er’ in case of rain. There is a rip in the canvas over my head, so I will be the first to know – it’s getting dark now and somebody forgot to put electric lights in this tent so I guess this is all I can write.” Two weeks later, he wrote, “As of this morning I am head armorer-gunner of crew #30. Crew #30 isn’t much to get excited about though, as all we have besides myself are the second armorer-gunner and the bombardier. I’m going to insist on a pilot before I do much.” A week later: “Our crew is changed around considerable. We lost everyone we had, but now we have a pilot, copilot and myself, which is much more practical than before . . . We fly today for the first time. Didn’t do much of anything but land and take off. After the third time I lost interest and slept most of the time.”

An observant young man with an unexpectedly sardonic sense of humor, born and raised in Pasadena, he had gone to trade school and left a job in the lithography department of the Los Angeles Times. Firmly convinced of all the then-forty-eight states there was only one good one, he was pleased that two other Californians were assigned to Crew #30: Lt. John Chandler, the co-pilot, was from Vallejo, and waist-gunner Sgt. Robert Thomas from Burbank. Both were married, and Mrs. Chandler was expecting a baby. True to the movie cliche, though, the rest of the crew was from all over: pilot and A/C commander, Lt. Sherman Dodge— also newly married— from Boston; bombardier Lt. James Becker from Kennet Square, Pennsylvania; flight engineer SSgt. James Festa, from Brooklyn; Sgt Louis Buonarobo, the ball-turret gunner (notably shorter than the other crewmembers) from the Bronx; navigator Lt. Frank Francis of El Paso, Texas; radioman SSgt Douglas McLendon from Greenville Mississippi, and waist-gunner Sgt. Warren Butterfield from Salmon, Idaho.

By mid-June they had accumulated fifteen flying hours. “Yesterday we made what they call ‘dry runs’—that is, going thru the motions of bombing something and don’t: that way, we bombed the city of Wenatchee, blew up the school in Quincy, a couple of dams, bridges and just about everything else in sight . . . got a letter from George— he had his first airplane ride and wished now he was flying. He could have had my place the other day when we went up to 30,000 feet, It got down to 40 below and I had to forget my flying boots! We just got up there and then an oil line broke so we had to come down, which couldn’t have happened at a better time. My nose was running under my oxygen mask and freezing on my lip. Very annoying. We had a gunnery mission today; I had the tail guns. I think they are mine permanently. At least I hope so, as I like it . . . we shot at targets on the ground. . .”

In July they moved to Geiger Field, near Spokane, for continuing training and a series of long flights all over the northwest; “We are supposed to be very observing of everything we see in the way of military objectives, especially trains and railway yards. Then we get questioned all about it, just as if we were over Germany or some place. I guess I will have to give up sleeping on future flights . . the navigator is getting me a set of maps so I can be able to tell where we are at. He claims in the tail I have the best view— not that anyone is depending on me, but he wants two of us . . “
In late fall, they were assigned a new B-17F, promptly christened the “Lonesome Polecat” by Lt. Dodge. Following another month of training flights, they ferried it to England, where the aircraft went to the replacement depot, and the crew to Rougham airfield, near Bury St. Edmunds, where they were assigned to an aircraft there. They promptly re-christened it “Lonesome Polecat II” but James Festa lamented during one of our conversations, they didn’t have it long enough to paint an emblem on the nose. Jimmy-Junior sent a telegram on arrival to let the family know they had arrived safely. Four V-mail letters followed, the last dated the day before his first combat mission: He couldn’t make sense of the coinage, there wasn’t much to buy that wasn’t rationed, he was making money faster than he could spend it. He hoped to visit London, and he had bought a bicycle to get around the field.

(Next: Part 3— Schweinfurt)

22. April 2005 · Comments Off on Old Pictures · Categories: General, History

The first picture hung in a black frame, in the back bedroom of Granny Jessie’s house in Pasadena for many years, a black and white photo of four graves piled high with flowers. Only recently did my mother realize, upon looking closely at it, that the flowers were carefully tended hot-house chrysanthemums, and even more fabulously expensive in 1943 as they are now. The grave markers are plain wooden crosses, painted white and the names just barely visible, for the picture was taken in haste and surreptitiously, smuggled out of Occupied France.

“James Menaud” is one of two names which can be clearly read; a misspelling of James Menaul who was my mother’s older brother, Jimmy Junior who was a tail gunner on a B-17 and died in the war. There was a badly-tinted portrait-photo in Granny Jessie’s living room, a young man awkward in a hastily fitted set of woolen class-As, smirking uncomfortably at the camera, frozen forever at 19. Our curiosity about him was never rewarded. Mom had been only thirteen at the time. Ten years ago, when my father found a picture of Jimmy Juniors’ crew— ten young men on the tarmac in front of a B-17, awkwardly solemn or cocky and smiling— everything had faded from memory except for the name of the aircraft commander, Lt. Sherman Dodge. We knew that only because his grave was next to Jimmy-Juniors’ in an unknown cemetery somewhere in France. The rest of what we knew fitted into one sentence: Sgt. James Menaul, Jr. was killed in action in the fall of 1943 on one of the raids on the Schweinfurt ball-bearing factories, and some of the other crewmen had survived and escaped into Switzerland. Dad finally asked me, as a persistent and inventive snoop, if I could find out their names and whereabouts, and what had happened to them.

I started with my uncle’s service number and unit of assignment, the 331st Squadron, 94th Bomb Group, Bury St. Edmunds. It was one of the units that had formed an association (since dissolved due to the age and infirmity of many of the members), and they replied promptly to my first letter of inquiry, confirming that Jimmy-Junior’s B-17, the Lonesome Polecat II was one of those lost on Black Thursday, October 14th, 1943.

60 8th Air Force B-17s, each with a crew of ten were lost in a single day, attacking the ball-bearing factories in two waves at about 3 o’clock in the afternoon, running a gauntlet of German air defenses to and from the target. A report on the status of various missing crewman, sent from the Army Mortuary Affairs Office contained some riveting extracts: Flights of enemy aircraft stood of at 1,500 yards on both sides and tail of the formation to ‘lob’ rockets or heavy cannon projectiles into the formation, while others attacked from the nose and top and bottom . . . Several enemy aircraft would dive through the formation from all angles, at times coming within four to six hundred yards . . . many that went down were hit by rockets or heavy cannon . . . whenever a Fortress was hit – it either exploded or fell apart. . . This aircraft was last heard on the ‘command channel’ and there were no eyewitnesses . . . This report showed no further information; the plane was simply missing from the formation . . .A total of 80 parachutes were seen in the vicinity of the target . . .the survivors were so busy avoiding enemy aircraft they were unable to observe what happened . . . Of the eighteen planes from this particular group which went on this mission, three aborted, thirteen failed to return and two completed the mission . . .Last seen at 1400 hours, just before it reached the target . . .Lost as a result of enemy aircraft.

(Next: Part 2: Crew Pictures and Old Letters)

(A version of this article was published in “Friends’ Journal”, the quarterly publication of the US Air Force Museum Foundation, Wright Patterson AFB, and accepted by a historical publication which shall remain nameless since they never actually scheduled it for publication or paid me a dime for it… and didn’t look likely to within the lifetime of anyone involved. William tells me that that particular magazine usually fobs off writers with a couple of subscriptions in lieu of cash anyway. I blow a large raspberry in their direction and publish it here anyway!)

20. April 2005 · Comments Off on Night Visitor · Categories: Domestic, General

Out of a number of things you do not want to be waked out of sound sleep by—say, projectile vomiting in the adjacent bathroom, an intruder breaking in downstairs— tops in my personal experience was the sound of several things, all at once: a violently slamming door, a child screaming, and a great deal of feline hissing and snarling. But this all did happen one late summer night in Athens, in the apartment where my daughter and I were living in Ano Glyphada, a couple of blocks up the hill from the taxi-stand at the bakery by the five-point intersection. The neighborhood is very much changed now, since the Olympics, but it was then an assortment of two or three story apartment blocks, with gardens, mixed in with small houses and empty lots. Our balcony, which ran along two sides of the building had a view of Aegina and the Saronic Gulf, and if you got on tiptoes at the end of it over the front door, where a huge bougainvillea vine went all the way up to the top of the building, you could just barely see ships anchored in the port of Piraeus.

Athens House

(Our place in Athens, c. 1984— the second floor. First floor, to Europeans)

We rented the second floor apartment from Kyrie Panayioti, who lived on the ground floor with his wife, Kyria Venetia and their two sons. Kyria Venetia’s sister, Kyria Yiota and her husband and their two children lived on the third floor. Each apartment took up the whole of the floor, and had windows all the way around, so as to get the full benefit of the breeze from the ocean. The ground floor garden, lovingly tended by Kyria Venetia, was shaded with small lemon and olive trees. Even I, with only my narrow walkway of a balcony, had pots of herbs and a small pine tree in a pot. The balconies were shaded by fine striped canvas awnings, installed at great expense by Kyrie Panayioti, and the interior rooms by a peculiar sort of slatted wooden shutter that could be raised or lowered by a fabric strap, or positioned at a half-way point with the slats separated to allow in a certain amount of air and light.

It was not just Blondie and I, on the second floor; she was just coming up to the age of three and a half, the right age to want pets. We had adopted a pair of kittens we had found, abandoned on a building site in the spring. Patchie was a tortoise-shell colored female, who looked like her coat had been stitched together from odd colored brown and caramel and black scraps left over from other cats; her presumed litter-mate Bagheera was solid black all over. They had grown into a fine looking, lively pair of young cats, who adored my daughter and slept on her bed for choice. They had the run of the apartment and balcony, and never seemed to want to go farther, although Patchie had fallen off the balcony railing one day, rolled down the first-floor awning and bounced off the end into Kyria Venetia’s patch of squash vines, from whence she sat and wailed for rescue.

At night, I lowered the shutters to the bottom of the window, but left them in the half-way position, all but the shutters in the kitchen, which I left open at the bottom for about ten inches, so Patchie and Bagheera could go in and out. I felt very secure with this arrangement, since we were on the second floor with no way for a human intruder to scale up twenty feet of sheer wall, but on that one night, we did have an interloper. The first I knew of it was the almost simultaneous scream from my daughter and the door to her bedroom slamming shut. I bolted out of bed in the pitch dark; fell over my slippers and out of my bedroom doorway into the hall. No matter— your child screaming for Mommy, you will crawl over broken glass to get to them. I wrenched open her bedroom door, and something furry brushed my ankles, as it exited in haste. Snapped on the light switch, I see my daughter sitting upright in a tangle of bedcovers, Patchie and Bagheera snarling and spitting as they dive for the door, small, fur-covered thunderbolts streaking past.

“It was another cat, Mommy,” said my daughter, as the sounds of bad cat-language diminish along the balcony outside. The bougainvillea rustled violently, one last frustrated snarl as our two feline guardians saw the intruder off, out the way he came. “It woke up Patchie and Bagheera, and they knocked the door shut. They were fighting and it woke me up.”
“Lovely, “I said, “Other people have watchdogs… we have watch-cats. Go back to sleep, sweetie.”
“Good, “Said my daughter,” They’ll keep everything bad away, won’t they.”
“We can only hope,” I said.

(And they did: Bagheera died at a relatively young age, after surgery for cystitis, but Patchie lived a long and adventurous life in three countries, and is buried in my garden in Texas, surviving just long enough to see Blondie come home from basic training. We were remembering this incident the other day, and Blondie wanted me to write something funny and cheerful about it.)

19. April 2005 · Comments Off on Germantown · Categories: European Disunion, General, History

The comments at Davids’ Mediancritik set off a train of thought for me last week about Germany and the US, about how the German media is about as nastily and unflattering about Americans as the French is, but only the French catch it in reverse from American media. The usual explanation is that we always thought of the French as friends and allies, whereas we were fighting Germany in both world wars and therefore didn’t have too many illusions to be shattered.

I think the real explanation is a great deal more complex, and goes much farther back than that- and curiously, it is something that swims to the surface of regional consciousness much more often in the US than in Germany. It just so happens that quite a lot of Americans are descended from German immigrants. And even more to the point, in a lot of places, like Texas and Pennsylvania, there were distinct German enclaves and settlements, going back even before the American Revolution, some of whom, like the Amish (or Pennsylvania Dutch— which is actually a corruption of deutch) still speak German amongst themselves.

There is a trick history question that sums the situation up nicely: “Who was the winningest German general of World War Two?” The expected answer is usually “Rommel,” but the correct and unexpected one is “Eisenhower.” You can do a variant of it with the winningest German admiral, too— and the answer would be Fleet Admiral Chester Nimitz, who commanded the Pacific Fleet. Both Eisenhower and Nimitz were ethnically German, the descendents of German immigrants to America. Nimitz was actually born and raised in the little town of Fredericksburg, established as a refuge for German settlers in the mid-1840ies. Up until the two world wars, German was the common language of communities thorough-out the Hill Country, communities which were as distinct and self-contained as a Chinatown, or a little Saigon is today. In the adjacent town of New Braunfels, the local newspaper is still called The Herald Zeitung. My mother remarked how very much like Pennsylvania the area around Fredericksburg looked, with tidy stone-built houses, neatly organized little farms and orchards, the very image of comfort and domesticity. The image of German settlers in America was quite wholly favorable, associated with well-run and prosperous establishments, excellent food, frugal and neat, in comparison with the sometimes more slapdash Scotch-Irish.

German settlers were well established in the colonies; historians estimate that although they were about a twelfth of the overall population, they formed an eighth of the Revolutionary Army. The Reverend John Peter Muhlenburg preached a fiery Sunday sermon to his congregation, and then theatrically took off his clerical robe to reveal a Continental Army officers’ uniform underneath, and asked for volunteers. He eventually raised a regiment, and led them with distinction. There may even have been some thought given to making German one of the languages of the new republic.

The failure of the 1848 Revolution in Germany sent a tidal-wave of educated, politically active German immigrants to the United States. German-born and the descendants of German settlers were the largest ethnic component of the Union Army— only the Irish came anywhere close. Over two and a half centuries they were a presence in the upper mid-west, in Pennsylvania, in Texas and the West, a presence in a way that the French only equaled in Louisiana. A lot of what are typically German virtues— hard work, thrift, self-improvement, tidiness— are also seen as American virtues, at least in flyover country.

I think we are inclined to cut the present-day Germans some slack, and to swallow some of our disappointment. They are still kin, you see. Distant, but still kin.

15. April 2005 · Comments Off on Teensy Footnote in History · Categories: General, History

There was one redeeming factor to James Cameron’s “Titanic” movie, to my eyes; and that lay in how rich, realistic and convincing the set of the “unsinkable” liner looked. How very solid, luxurious and sheltering it all appeared, such perfectly recreated spaces… and I could see how people would have been reluctant to leave it, at first. Who wanted to bounce around in a tiny open boat on the cold, on the open water? Surely, a ship as big as the Titanic, with every possible comfort, and modern advantage couldn’t be mortally wounded. Surely rescue was on the way, the situation couldn’t possibly be as bad as all that… Well, it was, and after seeing the movie, I could understand why the first couple of boats went away half-empty.

But there is a tenuous family connection to the loss of the Titanic, through the person of Granny Dodie’s older brother, Great Uncle Fred.
Great-Uncle Fred had a lady in a frilly skirt tattooed on each forearm, who did a kind of shimmy when he flexed his muscles, and he had been a sailor. He had been, in fact, a real sailor, on a real sailing ship, and had been around the Horn no less than four times, and thrilled us children with the tale of how he had fallen out of the topmost bit of rigging, once… but had managed to catch hold of a lower bit of canvas and rope before his Captain had been able to do much more than recollect the page number of the burial service in his Book of Common Prayer. (Well, we thought it was thrilling, everybody else had been listening to the same old story for forty years and were bored rigid.)

By 1912, the allure of a seafaring life had lost its charms for Great Uncle Fred and he was working on land, in Wanamakers’ Department Store in New York. (I have no idea in what capacity!) Wanamaker’s had a powerful Marconi wireless station on it’s roof. David Sarnoff, who would eventually be the president of RCA, the Radio Corporation of America, was the station manager and one of the operators. This Marconi station was one of the most powerful on the east coast, and was one of the first to receive news that the Titanic had struck an iceberg and might be sinking. It seemed barely credible, perhaps exaggerated, at first. According to Great Uncle Fred, one of the managers who knew he had been a sailor asked him if it were possible that a great ship like that might actually be so damaged that it would in fact, sink.

His moment of faint glory, being asked for his professional expertise in such weighty and tragic matters; his answer was a masterpiece of noncommittal caution;
“Could very well be,” Great Uncle Fred said.
I wish, now, that we had been able to make him tell us some other stories, but those are the only two I remember.

15. April 2005 · Comments Off on Too Much Gloom…. · Categories: General, The Funny

…despair and depression around here, time for a round of funny stories.

Like the one about the guy who was out fishing on the lake in a little boat, and as he stood up to cast his line in the water, his wallet slipped out of his pants pocket. Just as the wallet was about to fall into the water, a large carp rose out of the water and caught the wallet in its mouth. The guy tried to reach for the wallet, and the carp tossed it across the boat… and a second carp came up out of the water, and neatly caught the wallet in its mouth! The guy reached for his wallet again, and the carp tossed it over the boat, just out of reach, to the first carp! The first carp tossed it back, and the guy missed it again, as his wallet went flying over the boat to the second carp!

This is, of course, a historic moment, because it is the very first recorded case of carp to carp walleting!!!

Hey, it’s a Friday… add your own.

13. April 2005 · Comments Off on Italian “Journalist” on 60 Minutes Wednesday · Categories: General, Media Matters Not

Ms Sgrena, the Italian “journalist” who was the freed hostage in the car fired upon in the incident at a checkpoint near the Baghdad airport will be on 60 Minutes Wednesday tonight. I have already sent an e-mail to “60w@cbs.com” hoping that she will be served up more than the usually downy-gentle softballs, but I am not holding my breath.

Guys, the first thing you do when you hit the bottom is—- stop digging!

13. April 2005 · Comments Off on Pullet Surprise · Categories: General, History, Media Matters Not

Yes, the title is from an old Art Linkletter collection of the unconsciously funny things that small children say, but considering some recent and startling developments in the art of news photography in the fair environs of Baghdad, it may be quite appropriate to visualize a large egg. Picture this egg, laid on the assignments desk at the AP or CBS news, and entertain the suspicion that it may be entirely rotten. Imagine the careful handling these eggs received, with no one asking too many questions about how on earth a local stringer managed to be on Haifa Street, just in time to take pictures of the public murder of two Iraqi election workers. Or under exactly what circumstances another local stringer managed to be near a bridge in Fallujah last year.

Imagine the god-awful stench of it, once the egg is cracked, and too many nosey consumers of news begin asking hard questions about the process, about the compromises made, and the sources of these riveting, and Pulitzer prize-winning photos. Do you wonder, as you are settling into your breakfast toast and coffee with the front pages of the morning paper, or settling into the arm chair in front of the CBS evening news, if men have been set up to be murdered, in order to make a splashy image for the delectation of the news-consuming audience… and if the various media enterprises covering the war in Iraq are complicit? (More analysis, speculation and theorizing here, and here).

After all, two fairly major news figures are on record, and from a decade ago, as saying that in the interests of “covering the news” they would accompany an enemy patrol, keep quiet and watch an ambush of American troops go down. A French video photographer accompanying insurgents in Iraq did indeed video an attempt to shoot down a cargo jet. A cameraman variously described as “from CBS”, and “carrying CBS documentation” was alleged to have been shot by American troops as he stood next to an insurgent attempting to incite a mob; the speed with which this particular cameraman is being distanced from direct employment by CBS News is particularly telling… as is the fact that his camera contained Johnny-on-the-spot footage of previous ambushes. Clearly, the major news media will go to any length for that riveting video or frame, and brush aside any quibbles about the morality of having done so.

I am not going to get into the prolonged discussion of who hired whom, of where they were standing, how they got the word, and what lens they were using— that’s being done elsewhere. I want to draw a couple of rough parallels, and consider if CBS, or AP would then have published the photographs.

Suppose, just suppose there had been a local stringer for an American newspaper or Life Magazine, hanging around a particular crossroad in eastern France in December, 1944. Just suppose, just suppose that in all the confusion at the Baugnez crossroads, this photographer was in the right place to take pictures of American soldiers being gunned down… that this imagined photojournalist took pictures of the surrendering Americans, a mob of them herded into a field, and gunned down by the SS. Would pictures of SS troopers walking amongst the sprawled bodies in that snowy field, kicking at them, and administering a pistol-shot coup-de-grace to those still living have been published immediately, and the photojournalist be given a Pulitzer prize? Or would that photographer be assisting in the investigation of the Malmedy massacre, and giving a very full explanation of his presence and apparent freedom of movement amongst the SS?

Another historic parallel: in 1964, at the height of the civil rights struggle in the state of Mississippi, three young men— two New Yorkers and a native of the state—who were working to register black voters, so they could participate in free and democratic elections, were arrested near Philadelphia Mississippi by local law enforcement on spurious charges. When they were released, they were turned over to the local KKK, murdered and buried under an earthen dam. Suppose, just suppose, a photographer from the local paper was tipped off by a Klan member, and just happened to take pictures of the murder of the three men… who were murdered because they were encouraging people to vote in a free and fair election. The three young men in Mississippi in 1964, and the two Iraqi election workers in Haifa Street last year were both executed for very much the same reason— to discourage potential voters— and by people who wished very much that a free and fair election not take place.

When is photo opportunity really news… and when is it just another part of a public demonstration of terror, aimed at intimidating the electorate? I have a little more confidence that these questions would have been asked in the newsrooms of 1944, and 1964, that news editors might have felt a little squeamish about embedding with the SS or the KKK. In these impartial days, the questions don’t even arise. In the final analysis, and at the most extreme, the mainstream media outlets have— with the best of intentions, and the most logical justifications for every tortuous step of the way— sleepwalked into allying themselves with evil.

Three cheers for moral equivalence and impartiality.