21. June 2005 · Comments Off on Iran’s Real Turnout: About 10% · Categories: Iran

While the MSM continue to parrot Iran’s “official” claims of a high turnout in Friday’s election, Michael Ledeen at NRO reports on reality:

First, the numbers. The regime had made it clear that the size of the turnout would indicate its legitimacy with the public, so they had to come up with big numbers. After hours of hilarious confusion, during which the “official” numbers oscillated wildly and different vote totals were announced by the interior ministry and the Council of Guardians, the regime finally decided to claim that something like 65 percent of eligible Iranians had voted. But most clear-eyed observers with the freedom to move around the country and actually go to polling places, found very few voters. The Mujahedin Khalq, the longtime allies of Saddam Hussein who have long been a source of information on things Iranian, estimated that the real figure was about 10 percent. If you read The Scotsman, for example, you hear things like this:

…at a polling station in…an affluent suburb of northern Tehran, only 150 voters had arrived by mid-afternoon. “We have been given 1,000 ballot papers, so it seems the turn-out has been a lot lower than expected,” said Mohsen Jannati, the school’s headmaster, who supervised the voting.


The lowest participation — maybe as low as 3-5 percent — was in Khuzestan Province, where there had been bombings and protests in recent weeks. But anecdotal evidence from all over the country indicated a very low turnout, as of late afternoon. Despite this, the mullahs trotted out rosy reports of big voter turnouts, and even broadcast “live” TV coverage of voters queued up, waiting patiently to make their voices heard.

The only problem was that the pictures were from past elections. One woman called up a Tehran radio station to say that she was sitting at home watching the tube, and saw herself voting. Very droll indeed.

20. June 2005 · Comments Off on No Child Left Uncorrupted · Categories: Ain't That America?, Politics

I am moved by this commentary, from Joseph W. Gauld at the Portland [Maine] Press-Herald:

But our present education system is clearly failing in this responsibility. Former Bowdoin College President Rob Edwards called today’s students “ethically unformed . . . many with anxieties that have been sanctified.”

At our four Hyde Schools, all education is built on the development of character:

Curiosity: I am responsible for my learning; courage: I learn the most about myself by facing challenges; concern: I need a challenging and supportive community to develop my character; leadership: I am a leader by asking the best of myself and others; integrity: I am gifted with a unique potential and conscience is my guide in discovering it.

Once students truly internalize the power of these qualities, we find they are never willing to give them up in life, no matter what the circumstances. And their academic proficiency still sends 97 percent of both Hyde private and public school graduates to four-year colleges.

Since character is primarily developed by example, all Hyde parents and teachers undergo the same process, and they uniformly report the experience transforms their own lives. Their strong growth at Hyde reflects what our educational system had failed to do for them.

But character development is not a part of No Child Left Behind, only numerical results. The resultant corruption is staggering:

Most American schools are fairly safe, it’s true, and the overall risk of being killed in one is less than one in 1.7 million. The data show a general decline in violence in American public schools: The National Center for Education Statistics’ 2004 Indicators of School Crime and Safety shows that the crime victimization rate has been cut in half, declining from 48 violent victimizations per 1,000 students in 1992 to 24 in 2002, the last year for which there are complete statistics.

But that doesn’t mean there has been a decline at every school. Most of the violence is concentrated in a few institutions. According to the National Center for Education Statistics, during the 1999–2000 school year 2 percent of U.S. schools (1,600) accounted for about 50 percent of serious violent incidents—and 7 percent of public schools (5,400) accounted for 75 percent of serious violent incidents. The “persistently dangerous” label exists to identify such institutions.

So why are only 26 schools in the country tagged with it?

The underreporting of dangerous schools is only a subset of a larger problem. The amount of information about schools presented to the general public is at an all-time high, but the information isn’t always useful or accurate.

Thanks to the No Child Left Behind Act, now three years old, parents are seeing more and more data about school performance. Each school now has to give itself an annual report card, with assessment results broken down by poverty, race, ethnicity, disability, and English-language proficiency. Schools also are supposed to accurately and completely report dropout rates and teacher qualifications. The quest for more and better information about school performance has been used as a justification to increase education spending at the local, state, and national levels, with the federal Department of Education alone jacking up spending to nearly $60 billion for fiscal year 2005, up more than $7 billion since 2003.

But while federal and state legislators congratulate themselves for their newfound focus on school accountability, scant attention is being paid to the quality of the data they’re using. Whether the topic is violence, test scores, or dropout rates, school officials have found myriad methods to paint a prettier picture of their performance. These distortions hide the extent of schools’ failures, deceive taxpayers about what our ever-increasing education budgets are buying, and keep kids locked in failing institutions. Meanwhile, Washington—which has set national standards requiring 100 percent of school children to reach proficiency in math and reading by 2014—has been complicit in letting states avoid sanctions by fiddling with their definitions of proficiency.

The federal government is spending billions to improve student achievement while simultaneously granting states license to game the system. As a result, schools have learned to lie with statistics.

But where is the outrage? The Left rails at the excesses of the executives of Enron, Tyco, Global Crossing, et. al.. But public school officials across the nation are getting away with nothing more than a promise to “do better next time” – if that. And the children of our nation are being cheated on a scale that makes the employees, stockholders, and pensioners of these companies look little more than slighted.

I want to see some district superintendents, state secretaries of education, and the like, doing the “perp walk.”

20. June 2005 · Comments Off on Next Movie Trivia Question · Categories: That's Entertainment!

What is the address of Prof. Xavier’s school for “gifted” children?

As the prize for the first commentor with the correct answer – you get a free “The Daily Brief” coffee cup – as soon as we start making some. 🙂

20. June 2005 · Comments Off on My Apologies · Categories: Site News

As has happened all-too-frequently in the past, we seem to be having a spate of slow server response, or absolute downtime, in the recent hours.

As I have relayed to Stryker and Sgt. Mom, I am taking this matter in hand. And, I pledge to you: It will not continue.

All that needs to be resolved is co-hosting relationships between this site, and Digital Warfighter. That settled, I am on the job.

Again, I beg that you will please bear with us.

— Kevin

20. June 2005 · Comments Off on The Greatest All-American Rock Band · Categories: That's Entertainment!

I’ve done a similar, though less incisive post on another site previously. But I don’t think the issue is dead. What brings this to mind is that I am currently watching The Eagles: Farewell 1 Tour on Bravo, and I am reminded of my good friend, Glenn Reynolds, declaring Credence Clearwater Revival The Greatest All-American Rock Band some years back. Again, and much more stridently now, I take issue with that. In fact, I wouldn’t rate CCR as any more than an also-ran.

As issue number one, take the fact that, being from California’s East Bay, CCR was a phony southern rock band. I’m not so strident on this point, as, being principally Canadian, The Band was even more phony than CCR; and I really like them. But generally, if I want southern rock, I’ll go to Jacksonville (The Allman Brothers, Lynard Skynard), not Alameda, just as, if I want the blues, I’ll look to Muddy Waters, not Eric Clapton.

The Eagles, on the other hand, were pure California (as if anything from California, short of Humboldt County sensimilla, can be considered “pure”). At the same time, they were Buck Owens, Brian Wilson, John Phillips, and Donald Fagen (after his westward migration). And inasmuch, they gave birth to an entirely new genre. This is evidenced in the fact that such songs as Hotel California are regular fare on classic rock stations, while Take It Easy, and Desperado are heard regularly on progressive country.

But the real judge is after-the-fact. After the breakup of CCR, John Fogerty took an extended hiatus (which, I understand, contract requirements had a great deal to do with). And then he came out with a triumph in cheap pop (Centerfield). Glen Frey and Don Henley, on the other hand, blazed whole new territory in popular music.

Since then, Fogarty, like oh-too-many oldies artists, is just pumping out tired retreads of old hits. While The Eagles, as evidenced by the Farewell 1 Tour, are not simply as good as they’ve ever been (like The Rolling Stones, or Pink Floyd), THEY ARE BETTER.

The Greatest All-American Rock Band, without a doubt. Arguably the Greatest Rock Band of All Time: The Eagles.

17. June 2005 · Comments Off on Help, At A Loss Here… · Categories: That's Entertainment!

What was Raymond and Charlie’s father’s name in Rain Man? I’m at a loss.

17. June 2005 · Comments Off on Iran: The Blogger’s Paper Chase Is On · Categories: Iran, Politics, World

This Brian Murphy – AP report will establish the conventional wisdom for the moment. But my sources tell me it’s hardly the truth. More to come later:

TEHRAN, Iran (AP) – Iranian voters streamed to polling stations Friday, snubbing dissidents’ calls for a boycott in the closest presidential race since the 1979 Islamic Revolution. Results will decide who inherits a long list of challenges, including nuclear talks with the West and demands for reform at home.

Turnout appeared stronger than expected and polls stayed open an extra four hours, with voting booths even set up at Tehran’s main cemetery for those paying weekly visits to family graves. But the contest could still end with no clear winner, forcing a runoff next week.

Some credited U.S. denunciations of the election for goading more Iranians to cast ballots after a Western-style campaign that has reshaped Iranian politics. A runoff would almost certainly include front-runner Ayatollah Hashemi Rafsanjani, a political veteran and leader of the Islamic Revolution who now portrays himself as a steady hand for uneasy times.

On the contrary, I’ve heard of massive rejection of this election. Time will tell.

17. June 2005 · Comments Off on Into The West Part Deux · Categories: General

Well, I’m currently just a bit past the middle of episode 2; the wagon train. And I can tell you just now, being a haughty and iconoclasticlastic intellectual idealist, like myself, this film will hardly live up to Sgt. Mom’s standards as a “Dream Movie.”

That said, and accounting for real-world sensitivities, this is likely the best “Westward Ho!” flick of all time.

More later – watching.

What!?!?!?! This family, with their wagons, has just crossed into California in 1841. Forget it.

Update: No, give me a fucking break: Now the series has John C. Fremont (of who’s exploits I am quite familiar, encountering our immigrant family on the Monterey Peninsula, and carrying a Bear Flag.

No, – didn’t happen.

17. June 2005 · Comments Off on All The Evidence Proves that Al-Zarqawi Is An American Agent · Categories: General

What do you do about this?

All the evidence proves that Abu Mus’ab Al-Zarqawi is working for America, because his victims are Iraqis and not [members of] the coalition forces under the command of the American occupation forces in Iraq. Abu Mus’ab Al-Zarqawi’s official title is ‘leader of Al-Qa’ida’s faction in Iraq.’ Osama bin Laden is the commander of the Al-Qa’ida organization, and this proves that [Al-Zarqawi’s commander,] bin Laden, has [also] been an American agent ever since he operated against the USSR forces in Afghanistan in favor of the Americans!

Read the whole thing.

17. June 2005 · Comments Off on Hey James, Gotta’ Shut The Barn Door Before The Horse Gets Out · Categories: Media Matters Not

I just received this, as part of my OpinionJournal.com Best of the Web Today update, from James Taranto:

We’re scheduled to appear on “Kudlow & Co.” this afternoon, along with blogger Mickey Kaus, to discuss current politics. The program airs from 5 to 6 p.m. Eastern Time, and we’re told our segment will begin around 20 past the hour.

I’m on PST, and get my news over satellite. They are on right now (started at 2:30). I just scanned ahead in my guide; K&Co. does not repeat.

Upshot, for those that missed it: Kudlow, Taranto, and Kaus (three people I quite respect) all seem to agree that Dean and Durbin are the best friends Bush and the GOP have right now.

16. June 2005 · Comments Off on Survey: Iranians Feelings Similar To Americans · Categories: Iran

As this press release shows, Iranians feel about the same about America’s presence in the middle east, and their own country’s nuclear aspirations as the people in “red state” America:

Historic Survey Finds Plurality of Iranians Uneasy
if Regime Were to Develop WMD’s

WASHINGTON, June 9 /PRNewswire/ — A recent public opinion survey of Iranians, conducted by The Tarrance Group, surprisingly found that a vast majority (74%) of Iranians feel America’s presence in the Middle East will increase the probability of democracy in their own country. The survey, which was the first of its kind, found two-thirds of Iranians believe that regime change in Iraq has been a positive for both neighboring countries: with 66% believing that it served Iran’s national interests, while 65% believed the Iraqi people will, in the long-run, be better off.

Commissioned by the Iran Institute for Democracy, the survey discovered that a solid majority (65%) of Iranian adults consider fundamental change in Iran’s system of government, especially its Constitution, a must to bring freedom and more opportunities to their homeland.

Validating reports of widespread discontent with the clerical regime, three-fourths of Iranians (73%) support the call for a national referendum through which Iranians are given a chance to choose the form of government of their choice. Significantly, almost all Iranians reject their government’s attempts to keep exiled Iranians out of the political and economic equation of Iran. Fully 84% of all Iranians say Iranians living abroad should have a role in shaping the political and economic future of their homeland.

Presidential Election:
Regarding the forthcoming Presidential elections, in a troubling sign for the regime, nearly four of every five Iranians (79%) say that the upcoming elections should not be held unless they are free, fair and transparent.

While more than 70% of Iranians feel the world is closely monitoring the June 17 election process, in a telling sign, 57% of the population would be inclined to support a boycott of the elections if conditions for a free, fair and transparent election are not met.

Demonstrating disinterest in the pool of candidates, only 39% of adults were able to choose a candidate representing their viewpoint, with Hashemi Rafsanjani only leading (32%) among those who could identify with a candidate. Hence, Mr. Rafsanjani only enjoys 13% support among all Iranians, including those who could not identify an acceptable candidate. That said, when asked to make a prediction, 42% of all surveyed predicted Rafsanjani would be declared the winner of elections, indicating a perception of a predetermined conclusion.

Nuclear Issue:
On the nuclear issue, a solid majority of surveyed respondents inside Iran (60%) feel that the international community’s worry about the prospects of terrorists obtaining weapons of mass destruction is real. Further, a plurality (42%) says the Islamic Republic gaining access to nuclear weapons would add to their anxiety, discomfort and inability to sleep comfortably at night, while only 37% say it would not burden their peace of mind.

Methodology
Commissioned by the Iran Institute for Democracy, the survey was conducted among N=758 adults age 16+ (voting age) in Iran, from May 26 through June 4, 2005. Sample design, questionnaire design, and data processing were conducted by The Tarrance Group. Random digit dialing (RDD) was used to generate the sample, and interviews were conducted via telephone from a call center in the United States using Farsi-speaking interviewers. The margin of error associated with a sample of this size of +/- 3.6%, at the 95% confidence level. The average interview length was 24.6 minutes.

SOURCE Iran Institute for Democracy

16. June 2005 · Comments Off on “Bringing Down The War Machine” · Categories: Military

Gmash at Indepundit has a great essay on the counter-recruiters:

Sadly, these activists are only working to slow down the process of lifting the planet’s suffering masses out of the bitter cycle of poverty, famine, disease, and perpetual warfare. In this, they share much common ground with the terrorists who attacked our nation on September 11, 2001. It’s no coincidence that al-Qaeda selected the World Trade Center and the Pentagon as their primary targets — they are the very centers of American economic and military power that threaten to transform their world.

But after 9/11, America responded by pursuing an even more aggressive strategy of toppling backward regimes and encouraging democratic and economic reforms around the world. The radicals now realized that their only chance to halt this process was to somehow hobble the U.S. Military.

Searching for a “chink” in the armor of this military Leviathan, they looked back to their experience during the Vietnam conflict, when popular opposition at home was able to “bring down the American War Machine.” The driving force behind this opposition was the fear of involuntary conscription, or the military draft. But how does one cultivate such fear when the military is an all-volunteer force?

The answer was obvious: they had to make young people fear the return of the draft. They started a massive disinformation campaign, attempting to whip up fear that the Selective Service Administration was preparing for a new military draft. They even pointed to a bill languishing in a Congressional committee that called for mandatory military service for men and women.

The campaign fizzled. The bill was quickly brought to a vote, and soundly defeated. Legislators assured their constituents that they would not support a return of the draft.

Now they’ve decided to go directly after the military recruiters. They’re trying to keep the recruiters off campus, and failing that, scare the kids from talking to them. They’ve even gone so far as to picket and vandalize military recruiting centers.

Read the whole thing. Smash has launched a counter-counter-recruiting effort, which some of us might consider duplicating. I support these idiots’ right to say whatever they like, including, sadly, disinformation. But as for more “active” measures, prosecution is in order. And I would hope the charges are far more serious than vandalism – sedition comes to mind.

Hat Tip: InstaPundit

16. June 2005 · Comments Off on Legal Guide For Bloggers · Categories: General

This from the Electronic Frontier Foundation:

Whether you’re a newly minted blogger or a relative old-timer, you’ve been seeing more and more stories pop up every day about bloggers getting in trouble for what they post.

Like all journalists and publishers, bloggers sometimes publish information that other people don’t want published. You might, for example, publish something that someone considers defamatory, republish an AP news story that’s under copyright, or write a lengthy piece detailing the alleged crimes of a candidate for public office.

The difference between you and the reporter at your local newspaper is that in many cases, you may not have the benefit of training or resources to help you determine whether what you’re doing is legal. And on top of that, sometimes knowing the law doesn’t help – in many cases it was written for traditional journalists, and the courts haven’t yet decided how it applies to bloggers.

But here’s the important part: None of this should stop you from blogging. Freedom of speech is the foundation of a functioning democracy, and Internet bullies shouldn’t use the law to stifle legitimate free expression. That’s why EFF created this guide, compiling a number of FAQs designed to help you understand your rights and, if necessary, defend your freedom.

To be clear, this guide isn’t a substitute for, nor does it constitute, legal advice. Only an attorney who knows the details of your particular situation can provide the kind of advice you need if you’re being threatened with a lawsuit. The goal here is to give you a basic roadmap to the legal issues you may confront as a blogger, to let you know you have rights, and to encourage you to blog freely with the knowledge that your legitimate speech is protected.

A lot of material there. I will be looking it over later in the day, and post updates as I find anything extraordinary.

15. June 2005 · Comments Off on Inteesting Political Practices In Myanmar · Categories: General Nonsense, World

This from T. A. Frank at TNR:

Meanwhile, the leaders of Myanmar’s junta emerge as, arguably, the world’s most forward. The New Light of Myanmar, the country’s official newspaper, leads with the headline “Senior General Than Shwe felicitates President of the Philippines.” Although it’s hard to imagine this happened on camera, such actions may simply be customary in Burma, since, lower on the page, we also read “Prime Minister felicitates Russian counterpart.” Of course, that’s one way to conduct diplomacy. And now Burma has guests in town: “Chinese men’s volleyball team arrives.” One hopes that the task of felicitating them will be divided up.

LMFAO

14. June 2005 · Comments Off on No, No; Say It Isn’t So. · Categories: That's Entertainment!

After just one season of the best drama series in the history of TV, Glenn Close is leaving The Shield.

All I have to say to the remaining cast and crew is: you have some huge shoes to fill.

14. June 2005 · Comments Off on Hey, Here’s An Idea! · Categories: General Nonsense

Synthesizing from my posts here, and here, I say that it can be strongly argued that Michael Jackson was the “victim” of malicious prosecution. And, as he has no-doubt incurred millions of dollars in legal expenses, as well as a major set-back in his career, he must be entitled to a relief fund. I volunteer my services to organize and administer this.

Of course, my salary will be minimal – I promise.

14. June 2005 · Comments Off on Heigh-Ho, Let’s Go · Categories: That's Entertainment!

There aren’t many reasons I desire to travel to eastern Canada; one of them is the annual Stratford Festival. This year promises a special treat:

This year brings “As You Like It,” lyrics by William Shakespeare, music by the Barenaked Ladies. The Canadian folk-rockers aren’t performing live in the show, but singer Steven Page wrote the music. He and the other band members also recorded instrumental tracks and worked closely with the actors and musicians who are performing live.

Like The Bard himself, Barenaked Ladies have always been great for producing high art with tongue well into cheek. But, as I can’t afford a trip to Canada just now, I guess I’ll have to settle for the CD.

14. June 2005 · Comments Off on Nothing Like Charity For The Wealthy · Categories: Ain't That America?

I called Mayor Pearson-Schneider’s office, and this is not a hoax:

Laguna Beach, CA (PRWEB via PR Web Direct) June 14, 2005 — Mayor Elizabeth Pearson-Schneider announces an effort to aid recent victims of Laguna Beach’s landslides.

“It is the City’s goal to repair the hillside, the infrastructure and the roads in the landslide area. In addition, we want to create a ‘pad’ for each homeowner to build a new home,” said Mayor Pearson-Schneider.

The fundraising effort is called “Adopt a Landslide Family.” Private donors, large companies, associations, unions and others are being asked to raise $150,000 for each of the 20 affected families through their employees, members and other avenues. Families are expected to be homeless for over two years. The funds will be used as follows: $3,000 per month per family for living expenses for 30 months – for a total of $90,000. An additional $60,000 of the funds would be used for geology surveys and initial architectural planning. “We will accept family contributions on a cumulative basis,” added Pearson-Schneider.

The Mayor is partnering with the Laguna Beach Relief & Resource Center, a non-profit 501 (c)(3) charitable organization. Contributions will be tax-deductible.

As none of these homes were worth more than $5,000,000, Mayor Pearson-Schneider likely saw them as a blight on the city anyway.

Update: won’t you join me in offering this to the people of Laguna Beach:


Smallest Violin

The Tiniest Violin

14. June 2005 · Comments Off on Perhaps They Deserve Each Other? · Categories: General

Gerard Van der Leun at American Digest reports on some poetic justice:

IN A HASTILY CONVENED NEWS CONFERENCE this morning, President George W. Bush announced that the Prisoner of War Camp at Guantanamo, Cuba, had been closed last night and all its prisoners transferred by Executive Order via the private Gulfstream fleets of George Soros and Amnesty International to Neverland Ranch in California.

“Upon being found not-guilty of playing too rough with his boy-toys,” the President remarked, “Mr. Jackson telephoned me from his Suburban and offered to take some of my younger Arab prisoners off my hands.

14. June 2005 · Comments Off on Tearing My Heart Out · Categories: That's Entertainment!

It is interesting that Timmer brings up the subject of a McCartney concert just now, as I am currently watching McCartney In Red Square. And I have never heard a band murder Fool On The Hill as I did just now. It’s amazing that it was even McCartney’s composition in the first place.

Update: Still thinking about this. This is arguably McCartney Third greatest song, after Eleanor Rigby and Yesterday. Now, can you imagine Yesterday with out the instrumental flourishes and poignant pauses? It would be like Ben Stein reading in monotone: “Yesterday, love was such an easy game to play. Now I need a place to hide away. Oh, I believe in yesterday.”

13. June 2005 · Comments Off on I Was Thinking Of Signing Up On A Cyber-Dating Site… · Categories: General Nonsense

…And I was trying to think of a good handle. And I wanted to go with something of a prehistoric flavor, as these are like the modern manifestation of the ancient mating rituals.

Well, the first thing I was on was Homo Eclectus. But it seems that some band already grabed that.

So now I’m thinking Homo Heidelbergensis. Why? Because they were the first strain of humans to create tools too large to be efficient as tools – can you say SUV?

LMFAO.

13. June 2005 · Comments Off on Absolute Genius! · Categories: General

Anyone that entertains – particularly at Bar-B-Ques, is likely to love the Plate Caddy.

13. June 2005 · Comments Off on Yeah, So? · Categories: Media Matters Not, Politics

I was in line at the supermarket this afternoon. And I spied the July issue of Vanity Fair, whose cover featured a very nice picture of Nicole Kidman (She may not act so good, but she shur is purdy.). And one of their headline stories constitutes excerpts from the new book by Edward Klein: The Truth About Hilary, which Matt Drudge reports on here.

Well, with the MJ trial over, the “dirt” of this story, that Chelsea is the result of Bill “raping” Hilary, is sure to be the next tabloid media (read virtually all of MSM) flavor of the week.

But I have to ask, WTF difference does it make? My only concern with the Clintons, at this point, is what constitutes Hilary’s fitness for elected office? How does this effect that?

13. June 2005 · Comments Off on Unrest In Khuzestan. No, It’s A Good Thing · Categories: Iran

If you don’t know about Khuzestan, check out Roger L. Simon’s post here.

Hat Tip: InstaPundit

12. June 2005 · Comments Off on On That Train All Graphite And Glitter… · Categories: General Nonsense, Israel & Palestine, Technology

…Undersea by rail.
Ninty minutes from New York to Paris.
Well by seventy-six we’ll be A.O.K.

I’m currently watching this crazy show on Discovery Channel – Transatlantic Tunnel. They are proposing a 3100 mile submersed teathered tube, through which will run mag-lev trains running at 5000 mph! I’m still waiting to see how they propose to pump the air pressure down in the tunnel low enough to eliminate the aerodynamic friction.

But now for something really absurd! I’m reminded of this post from a couple of weeks back in LGF:

This seems to be the day for mainstream media emissions that you just can’t believe. From the New York Times: The Day After Peace: Designing Palestine. (Hat tip: ted.)

His high-speed railway would run for 70 miles along the West Bank ridges, linking Jenin in the north with Hebron in the south. The railway would then slip like a fishhook through the Negev desert to attach the West Bank to the Gaza Strip, running 130 miles in all and establishing the connection between the two territories that development officials consider essential to a Palestinian economy. Alongside the railway, Mr. Suisman proposes stretching a water conduit, a trench for fiber-optic cable, power lines, a toll road and a strip of parkland.

He would site the train stations at a distance from existing city centers, connecting each pairing with other public transportation. The idea was to create new frames for housing and businesses, to accommodate the expanding population while preserving open space. He compares his crosshatched line to an embryo’s backbone and, inevitably, an olive branch.

The Rand studies were prompted by California-based donors hoping to see an end to the conflict. Carol and David Richards, financed the detailed study of the viability of a Palestinian state. Mr. Richards said he acted after Mr. Bush came out in favor of a two-state solution.

“I’m a supporter of Israel, but I think their occupation of the West Bank is hurtful to Israel,” said Mr. Richards, a former mutual fund manager who is now a private investor. “The policy is wrong, and we as Americans have condoned it and supported it.”

The Arc grew out of a proposal by another donor, Guilford Glazer, that Rand design a new Palestinian city to accommodate any returning refugees of the 1948 Israeli-Arab war and their descendants. Born in Knoxville, Tenn., in 1921, Mr. Glazer, a real estate developer, was partly inspired by the model of the Tennessee Valley Authority, believing the Palestinians would benefit from a project of similar scale. (Rand estimated that the Arc would cost about $6 billion, and that it would help the Palestinians power their economy by employing 100,000 to 160,000 Palestinians a year for five years.) When the Arc is built, he said, “it’ll be too precious to lose, and it’ll cause them to resist violence.”

I have to agree with this comment from LGF reader Kragar:

When the Arc is built, he said, “it’ll be too precious to lose, and it’ll cause them to resist violence.”


Considering these people are willingly sacrifcing their own childen, what makes this tool think a few buildings would change the Palis?

LMFAO

12. June 2005 · Comments Off on If This Is Torture, Where Do I Surrender? · Categories: Media Matters Not, Military

Eugene Volokh explores this article in The Guardian:

Among the most shocking abuses Saar recalls is the use of sex in interrogation sessions. Some female interrogators stripped down to their underwear and rubbed themselves against their prisoners. Pornographic magazines and videos were also used as rewards for confessing.

In one session a female interrogator took off some of her clothes and smeared fake blood on a prisoner after telling him she was menstruating. ‘That’s a big deal. It is a major insult to one of the world’s biggest religions where we are trying to win hearts and minds,’ Saar said. . . .

Eugene’s conclusion is that, while this may be inappropriate, it hardly rises to the level of sexual torture. I might also note that Saar has both a political agenda and a book to sell. But from my other reading on the subject, I don’t recall the term sexual torture being used. So I’m inclined to believe that the application of this term here originated with The Guardian, who’s reporting is frequently tainted by their own agendas.

12. June 2005 · Comments Off on Aquaint: The Holy Grail Of Search · Categories: Technology

This from James Fallows at NYT:

One branch of the federal government is desperate enough for a better search tool that its efforts could be a stimulus for fundamental long-term improvements. Last week, I spent a day at a workshop near Washington for the Aquaint project, whose work is unclassified but has gone virtually unnoticed in the news media. The name stands for “advanced question answering for intelligence,” and it refers to a joint effort by the National Security Agency, the C.I.A. and other federal intelligence organizations. To computer scientists, “question answering,” or Q.A., means a form of search that does not just match keywords but also scans, parses and “understands” vast quantities of information to respond to queries. An ideal Q.A. system would let me ask, “How has California’s standing among states in per-student school funds changed since the 1960’s?” – and it would draw from all relevant sources to find the right answer.

In the real Aquaint program, the questions are more likely to be, “Did any potential terrorist just buy an airplane ticket?” or “How strong is the new evidence of nuclear programs in Country X?” The presentations I saw, by scientists at universities and private companies, reported progress on seven approaches to the problem. (The new I.B.M. search technology discussed here last year is also part of the Aquaint project.)

The world’s best search engine? Katharine Hepburn in Desk Set. 🙂