19. January 2005 · Comments Off on Memo: Throwing Stones at Frogs · Categories: General, Media Matters Not

To: Ms Boxer @NY Times, and other Major Media Players
From: Sgt Mom
Re: OpSec

Here at the Daily Brief, a collective blog of present and past members of the various military services, one of the very few general guidelines I have established concerns the practice of OpSec. OpSec, or Operations Security, can be boiled down to one simple concept; never give away anything you know that someone might use to kill you or someone else. Mind you, a determined and lucky spy can eventually find out whatever they want to know, but as a military broadcaster I considered it a point of honor to make them work as hard as possible. All the imps in hell would have to be fitted out with long winter underwear before I would thoughtlessly spill something on the air, or in print about a scheduled operation, or the specific location of a high-ranking officer, vulnerabilities in our base structure or security… any number of items which might be considered valuable bits of essential information to a hostile power.

Because, you see, if I did… people might die.

Let me repeat that again: people might die.

People I knew, or didn’t know, people who wore the same uniform, or no uniform at all. They would be painfully, messily, permanently dead, because of my story, a story which would be so much archived wastepaper, or magnetized tape by the next day.

I couldn’t cope with knowing that I had lightly and thoughtlessly handed over information to an enemy which resulted in those deaths.
I realize of course, that you may be unused to consider this; in certain rarified worlds, speculation that someone is a CIA agent may just get one snubbed at trendy cocktail parties, or not invited in the first place. There is no harm, no foul there, in passing on airy speculation about who works for whom. Unfortunately, carelessly repeating speculation, without analysis or even going to the extent of a debunking has the unfortunate result of validating it. In the real world, this often has fatal results, and in this current instance has put you into the position of appearing to paint a big fat “x” on the forehead of an Iraqi blogger for the sake of a jazzy headline with your name under it.

I prefer to attribute this lack of care on your part to ignorance, rather than malice. I beg you, in this time of war, to carefully consider how certain elements in your future stories may be used by those of hostile intent
As the poet, Bion of Smyrna observed “Though boys throw stones at frogs in sport, the frogs do not die in sport, but in earnest.”

Sincerely
Sgt Mom

18. January 2005 · Comments Off on Eating Politically · Categories: General

Sandy Szwarc rakes the new nutrition guidelines (as well as the old ones) over the coals:

When food guides were begun over 100 years ago, the government was tasked to make recommendations on the minimum number of servings of various food groups to ensure the general population could meet the recommended dietary allowances of nutrients. People were free to choose what additional foods they wanted to enjoy to make up their energy needs. That changed in 1977 when politicians got involved and its focus became outlining the goals for federal food programs, and hence what foods would receive government funding. From then on, as a glut of special interests sought to get their piece of the money pie, it has moved further from sound science. And not surprisingly, it’s become increasingly questioned among nutrition scientists and health care professionals.

The 2005 Dietary Guidelines became untenable the instant they abandoned the long-term pledge to promote better health for all Americans and instead made everything about weight. “Weight” appears 150 times in the 84-page document. We’re told that being thin is more important than being healthy and that good nutrition isn’t just eating a healthful balance of nutritious foods. Our focus must become counting calories, restricting what we eat, eating low-fat or fat-free foods, and what size pants we wear.

[…]

Like its eating advice, the exercise advisories fail to consider harmful consequences. Injuries go up with the duration and intensity of exercise. But what’s most likely to happen with these guidelines is that people will just give up bothering to exercise at all. Those who care about their health were doing good to get in 30 minutes of physical activity a day. Now they’re being told that isn’t enough. But how realistic is 90 minutes a day for most people? And really, how many thin people do you know who work out 90 minutes every day — who aren’t obsessive? Actually these guidelines will likely increase another growing health problem, a side of eating disorders called exercise anorexia: exercising beyond that needed for health in an attempt to keep thin.

Of course, for those in the military, subject to having any aspect of their behavior under government control, these new guidelines are even more foreboding.

Hat Tip: Instapundit

18. January 2005 · Comments Off on Catholic Archbishop Released · Categories: General

From CNN:

MOSUL, Iraq (CNN) — A Catholic archbishop has been released one day after he was kidnapped in the northern Iraqi city of Mosul, the Vatican confirmed Tuesday.

No ransom was paid for the release of Basil George Casmoussa, a spokesman for the Vatican in Rome said. There were reports that the kidnappers used his cell phone to demand a $200,000 ransom for the 66-year-old archbishop.

The thought of what may have happened if they had actually killed him gives me shivers. Any illusion that this is not a religious war would have completely disolved. The term “Mass Riots” would have taken on new meaning. Of course, that just may be my Jesuit education on one too many cups of pure Kona coffee mingling with the fact that I just finished “The DaVinci Code” this weekend.

May be the smartest thing I’ve seen a terrorist do in years.

17. January 2005 · Comments Off on Caption Contest Deferal · Categories: General

In lieu of this week’s Caption Contest I defer to Conservative Life’s Contest this week. I can’t begin to try and come up with a better picture. It’s so wrong on so many levels.

Via Rodney over at Outside The Beltway.

17. January 2005 · Comments Off on To the Farthest Shore · Categories: Ain't That America?, General

Found this amusing nugget here; apparently this B-grade German movie actress spent a year trying to break into the Hollywood A-list, without any appreciable success, and now is going the media rounds back home in dear old’ Deutschland being (understandably) ungracious about the experience… and generally slagging off the rest of the country—seemingly without ever setting foot outside the fabled environs of So Cal show-biz. Well, it’s kind of like going to the Cannes Film Festival, and then holding forth as an expert on all of France, past and present. Or hitting the highlights of New York, and Disneyland and Hollywierd, and assuming that is all there is and all you ever need to see of America. I would make the following suggestions for an itinerary to a traveler from another country who wants to get a more nuanced idea of what lies between the coasts.

1. Don’t fly— it’s too easy then to miss what a big country it is, and how varied. Rent a car, or a camper-van, and drive— it’s how we do it. Drive across the country, from north to south, east to west, on the interstates when you have to, but the secondary roads are more fun. It’s a big country. There are stretches of interstate in the West where it can be 100 miles to the next gas, and nothing in sight constructed by humans save the highway itself. A hundred and fifty years ago, it took six months for travelers on foot, horseback, ox-drawn wagons or mule trails, making fifteen miles a day if they were lucky, and following barely visible trails from the Missouri River to the west coast. There are still wide-open spaces… quite a lot of them actually.

2. This trip, pretty much avoid any place that has had big movie or a long-running TV show set in it. Fargo ND and Paris, TX are exceptions.

3. Stay in campgrounds, B and B’s, family run-hotels in small towns. Eat at non-chain places well off the road, especially if half the vehicles parked out front are battered pickups with local plates, and half are well-kept vehicles with out of state plates. Find these places by chatting up people you meet, around mealtimes, and ask them where they would go for a good bite to eat.

4. Shop at a big American supermarket a couple of times: doesn’t matter which one. A Smiths, Food Lion, HEB, Ralph’s, Albertsons. Even a super-Wal-Mart.

5. Go to a local little-theater presentation, a Friday-night football game in a small Texas town, a weekend farmers’ market/swap meet, a church pot-luck supper, a Civil War re-enactors encampment, a state fair, a Rocky Mountain rendezvous, a military base open house, a town festival— strawberry days, artichoke days, pioneer days, whatever days. Go to an arboretum, a public garden, a rally of whatever sort of vehicle takes your fancy and fits your schedule; antique cars, motorcycles, old airplanes. Stop to look at historical markers, roadside attractions, strange and wonderful local creations. Take the scenic route, the long way round, pull off and take pictures at the look-out point. Sleep under the stars once or twice.

Take a couple of months to do this, and you’ll have a better idea of what it’s about than all our movies and television could ever give you. These suggestions and any others that may be added by readers in the comments go double to any of our own major media creatures who were gob-smacked by the results of the November election.

17. January 2005 · Comments Off on A Non-News Story · Categories: General

Are the idiotaians at the Miami Herald totally unaware that it’s routine practice for police to trade-in their old weapons?

Cops sell old, confiscated guns

Unable to afford new weapons, the Sweetwater Police Department is selling old and confiscated guns. Some critics call this a very dangerous practice.

BY SUSANNAH A. NESMITH AND JONNELLE MARTE
jmarte@herald.com

The cash-strapped police department in Sweetwater has found a way to get brand-new guns for all its 23 officers — sell the old ones.

Police Chief Robert Fulgueira just received commission approval to sell 20 guns that were either confiscated or voluntarily turned in over the past decade — weapons that most police agencies would destroy. The department is also trading in about 45 old service weapons that were issued to officers.

Fulgueira set up the deal with Lou’s Police and Security Equipment. The Hialeah store ranks first among Florida gun shops in terms of the number of guns sold that were subsequently used in crimes, according to a national study. The ranking does not mean that Lou’s has violated any law, though.

”We’re a poor city and I don’t have the budget to be spending $7,000 to $8,000 on weapons,” Fulgueira said. “Why should I pay money to destroy these guns when I can sell them, make some money and use it to equip my men?”

Sweetwater PD Glock 23
TAKING AIM: Sweetwater police Officer Domingo Benito
shows off his old outdated Glock pistol. He should have a
new one as soon the city’s planned sale is completed.
Photo: David Adame / for The Herald

But the Glock 23 is hardly “outdated”.

16. January 2005 · Comments Off on Don’t Miss This · Categories: General, That's Entertainment!

After 25 years, I have just seen Being There, currently showing on HBO, for the first time. Perhaps they stirred up some interest with their excellent bio-pic The Life and Death of Peter Sellers. I can’t thank them enough.

This movie seems to have gone totally over the heads of those who only know Sellers as Inspector Clouseau, as it was an absolute flop at the box office, despite a Best Actor Oscar nomination for Sellers, and a Supporting Actor win for Melvyn Douglas. But if you like comedy which is wry and nuanced, as I do, you must see this. I can’t wait until they show it again.

14. January 2005 · Comments Off on Book List · Categories: General

From E-Claire, who got it from The Cheese Stands Alone:

Copy the list from the last person in the chain, delete the names of the authors you don’t have on your home library shelves and replace them with names of authors you do have. Bold the replacements.

here’s my list (with over 1000 books at home, these were just the first names that came to mind):

1. J.K. Rowling
2. William Gibson JRR Tolkien
3. Neil Gaiman Dick Francis
4. Neal Stephenson Madeleine L’Engle
5. Terry Pratchett
6. Charles Stross Elizabeth Moon
7. Rex Stout Anne McCafferey
8. Paul Di Filippo Earlene Fowler
9. Eric Garcia Terri Blackstock
10. Bruce Sterling Tom Clancy

14. January 2005 · Comments Off on Response to Kevin’s “Milblogger” Challenge · Categories: General, Military

For pictorial proof of service… voila!

Incredibly dorky semi-official photo, taken while on staff at AFRTS-Sondrestrom in 1982, by a photog who clearly had a brilliant future at the DMV taking drivers’ license pictures…

14. January 2005 · Comments Off on Word, Bill · Categories: General

Dr. Cosby again speaks the truth:

“Our children are trying to tell us something and we are not listening,” Cosby told the audience of about 1,800. “And the poverty pimps and victim pimps keep telling the victims to stay where they are, ‘you can’t get up, you can’t do this, you can’t do that’ … I’m telling you, you better get up.”

Hear, hear.

13. January 2005 · Comments Off on A Liar In Our Midst · Categories: General

James Hudnall is incensed that someone would tell tall tales about their military record. To show he’s genuine, he’s posted a picture of himself at Camp Bullis.

He suggests we all do something similar. Well, I can’t say that Sgt. Mom or myself go to any lengths to vet our contributors (pun most certainly intended). But, as for myself (and I’m confident she agrees), unless the quality of their posts leads me to believe something otherwise, I see no reason not to take them at their word.

Sgt. Mom, of course, is something of a célébrité mineure, by virtue of her specialty in broadcasting, while in the service. And as such, her qualifications should go without question. As for myself, I still have my DD214, if anyone’s really interested. 🙂

13. January 2005 · Comments Off on Memo: Field Guide to American Military Personnel · Categories: General

From: Sgt Mom
To: Media and Other Clueless Civilians
Re: Correctly Identifying Branch of Service

Mother: “There’s another dead bishop on the landing, vicar sergeant!”
Detective: Uh, Detective Parson, madam. I see… suffragen, or diocesan?
Mother: ‘Ow should I know?
Detective: It’s tattooed on the back o’ their neck.
(Monty Python’s Dead Bishop Sketch

Our branch of service is not, in fact, tattooed in such an inaccessible location, but one wouldn’t know it from the frequent and hilarious mis-identification in various media, all of which amuse and exasperate current and veteran military personnel no end. Foreigners can be cut a little bit of slack, especially those whose first language is NOT English, but there is no excuse for our own professional media creatures, who are supposed to pride themselves on their grasp of nuance and exactingly observed details….. because the service branch is machine-embroidered/stenciled in half-inch letters directly above the left-front pocket of the BDUs, cammies, utilities, fatigues, or whatever.. People, you look like pretty silly, when you make a mistake like that.

Know also that when you refer to Marines as soldiers, or label an Air Force forward air traffic controller as an Army infantryman, you have not only demonstrated a certain lack of attention to detail, but you have also managed to insult the respective members of the services involved. Somewhat chauvinistically, we all take pride in our respective services, and detest being mistaken for… ugh… THOSE OTHERS! While all the forest-green or desert cammies are worn by members of all services, there are certain differentiating criteria instantly apparent to the cognoscenti… unless you are at a considerable distance.

In the interests of informing and educating the general, non-military public, I offer the following additional tips for those who suddenly have to become conversant with the US military uniforms of the various branches, their ranks, and specialties.

1. The class A uniform, roughly equivalent to proper business attire should be sufficiently distinctive to the most casual observer; although the Marines and Navy do play fast and loose with some variations, generally the Air Force is wearing medium blue with aluminum-toned buttons, the Army dark green with brass buttons, and the Marines in a lighter sage-green with black buttons. The Navy is usually clad in black, when not in white, and occasionally in khaki. The last name of the person in the uniform is displayed discretely over the right-front pocket, opposite any display of ribbons denoting awards and decorations, which may be seen as a sort of color-coded professional resume. Do not presume to use the service members’ first name. If they have one, it is strictly reserved for close friends and family. The first name for public use is their rank, “Private, Lance Corporal, Sergeant, Captain, et cetera”, although upon closer acquaintance such familiarities as “Sarge” or “Ell-Tee” are somewhat acceptable.

2. The enlisted ranks for all services, usually displayed prominently on the upper sleeves of both the class A and utility uniforms differ significantly as to service. Generally the bigger the insignia, and the more stripes the higher the enlisted grade, although one can be forgiven for being a little foggy about just what equals what. (I myself have never quite worked out the equivalents between the Army private and specialist ranks.) Officer insignia are more standard, across the services, and therefore simpler, although the Navy again does interesting things with gold braid. Look for officer insignia on shirt collar, shoulder epaulettes or on headgear.

3. Standards of personal grooming are most strictly enforced in all services. Unless under extremely trying circumstances, male personnel are clean-shaven, although certain allowance is made for neat and short mustaches. Army and Marine males more often sport that particular haircut known as a high-and-tight, which appears as if they had shaved their heads entirely and then parked some small and short-furred dead rodent on the very top. Air Force and Navy men are not immune from this fashion, and it is occasionally seen among the more direct combat oriented specialties. At one point, Navy men were permitted to grow short beards, and sometimes Army Special Forces personnel are now allowed them, especially when snooping around in the wilds and attempting to blend in with indigenous personnel. But these sartorial heresies generally make the higher military powers hyperventilate, and so were (and are) of limited duration.

There is one hair rule for female personnel of all services which is “Above the collar!!!!” which in practice means their hair is either short enough that it does not touch the collar of any uniform combination, or wrangled into some sort of neat bun. Cpl. Blondie informs me that in the case of female Marines, the rubber bands and hairpins necessary to perform this function must be in all cases completely invisible. Army and Air Force women just need to use those implements which match their hair color.

4. Curiously enough, Army and Air Force personnel may be differentiated from Marines at some distance, when all are clad in BDU (forest or desert) if it is a hot day, and everyone has rolled up their sleeves. Marines will roll them straight up, with the paler wrong-side of the sleeve fabric showing. Army and Air Force personnel must perform an intricate sort of origami-folding to the sleeves which leaves nothing of the wrong side of the fabric showing.

My direct personal knowledge of these matters is some years out of date, so if any of the other members of the collective (or our readers) have corrections, or further tips or recommendations, feel free to chime in.

Wishing you the best in field-spotting the Services— Remember, it’s written right on the front of their cammies!!!

Sgt Mom

13. January 2005 · Comments Off on Ballistic Fingerprinting Debunked · Categories: General

This should be no surprise to most of my readers. But, despite the facts, I doubt this myth will die a quick death:

(CNSNews.com) – Maryland’s “ballistics imaging” system isn’t working and ought to be scrapped, says a report from the Maryland State Police.

A Maryland law that took effect in 2000 requires gun makers to test-fire all new handguns sold in the state so that each gun’s “ballistic fingerprint” may be entered into a state database. Each fired shell casing has unique markings that police — theoretically — can use to identify guns that were used in crimes.

But as gun control opponents have long noted, the unique markings that gun barrels leave on shell casings can be easily altered, either deliberately or through wear on the gun. Second Amendment supporters say “ballistics imaging” systems amount to gun registration.

The Citizens Committee for the Right to Keep and Bear Arms (CCRKBA) is congratulating Republican Gov. Robert Ehrlich’s administration for releasing the findings of the Maryland State Police Forensic Sciences Division.

12. January 2005 · Comments Off on San Francisco Collision · Categories: General, Military

(Recieved from a new applicant for the Daily Brief Collective— my hotmail account is frelled during the day, this is the first I could get to it– Sorry for delay—- Sgt Mom)

At 10 January 1634 local (100134 EST) the USS SAN FRANCISCO returned safely to Apra Harbor, Guam. The ship moored with her own line handlers in a normal submarine configured mooring (AFT draft is 27′-10” (normal AFT draft is 32′) and FWD Draft is above the draft marks with the waterline at the point the towed array faring begins; 0.8 degree STBD list and 1 degree Down bubble indicating by naval architecture calculations that 1 A/B and 2A/B MBTs are most likely flooded). The severely injured Machinist Mate (Engineroom Upper Level Watch at time of grounding) was evacuated immediately and transferred by ambulance to Naval Hospital Guam where a fully staffed medical team was standing by. He is conscious and in stable condition. Approximately fifteen additional injured personnel requiring medical care subsequently departed the ship and were transported to the hospital after taking a moment to meet with family members.

Crew members from the USS CORPUS CHRISTI, HOUSTON and FRANK CABLE assisted in line handling and various return to port evolutions such as propulsion plant shutdown, shore power cables, and rig for surface. Standing by on the pier was a full complement of watchstanders from USS CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI (and SAN FRANCISCO stay-behinds) to satisfy all watchstanding requirements for reactor plant shutdown with follow-on import forward and aft watch sections.

Following the grounding on 8 January, the ship transited on the surface at 8kts with surface escort, USCGC GALVESTON ISLAND to Apra Harbor, Guam. Due to deteriorated weather conditions on the evening of 9 January, the Commanding Officer shifted bridge watch stations to control and shut bridge access hatches to maximize watertight integrity in light of reserve buoyancy concerns. The ship maintained stability throughout the surface transit with continuous operation of the Low Pressure Blower on the Forward Main Ballast Tanks. SAN FRANCISCO has experienced no reactor plant, propulsion train or electrical system degradations as a result of the grounding. The Commanding Officer shifted the Officer of the Deck’s watch to the bridge on 10 January in preparation for piloting into Apra Harbor.

The critically injured Machinist Mate (Auxiliaryman) passed away yesterday afternoon as a result of his injuries. The MM2 was in Aft Main Seawater Bay at the time of the grounding and his body was thrown forward approximately 20 feet into Propulsion Lube Oil Bay. He suffered a severe blow to his forehead and never regained consciousness.

Emergency medical personnel, including a Naval Hospital Guam surgeon, Undersea Medical Officer and Independent Duty Corpsmen, arrived on the ship via helicopter transfer to provide immediate medical care and prepare the crewmember for medical evacuation on the morning of 9 January.

Unfortunately, the sailor’s condition deteriorated and he died onboard while under the care of the embarked physicians. Just moments prior to the sailors death, I spoke with the Sailor’s father in preparation for their pending travel from Ohio to the West Pacific to see their Son. Since then I have passed on to his Dad my condolences on their son’s death and reassured them their son’s remains would be treated with utmost respect and dignity.

His father expressed great gratitude for the extraordinary efforts made by the Navy to save his son’s life. He told me his son loved the Navy, having just reenlisting earlier this year and wanted to make it a career. That when he called home he always talked about the many friendships and the wonderful camaraderie the crew of SFO exhibited. Prior to sailing, he was really excited about the pending ship visit to Australia. The parents are considering traveling to Guam, with Navy support, at some point to meet the crew and partake in a memorial service for his son.

For the remainder of the transit, the embarked medical trauma team administered medical care to the other injured personnel. Their careful attention and evaluation augments the ship’s Independent Duty Corpsman’s heroic efforts since the grounding.

Submarine Squadron Fifteen COMMODORE, Captain Brad Gerhke and Captain Paul Bushong, Commanding Officer of the Submarine Tender USS FRANK CABLE have mobilized their assets, staffs, crews and local Navy Community to provide comprehensive support to the SAN FRANCISCO. Professional counselors, medical personnel and Navy Chaplains are scheduled to meet with the entire crew to provide grief counseling and assistance throughout the next several days and as required over the long term. Brad has been meeting frequently with the SFO families and they are doing remarkable well. The entire Navy community in Guam has come to the SFO’s families’ assistance. I have talked to Kevin Mooney’s (SFO Skipper) wife, Ariel. Her state of mind is positive and resolute, with a courageous and upbeat view of the trying days ahead.

The ship’s Main Ballast Tank damage and deformation has degraded maneuverability and mandated the use of two tugs to moor in Apra Harbor. A Pearl Harbor Naval Shipyard/NAVSEA Material Assessment Team comprised of a structural engineer, MBT vent expert, air systems expert and naval architect arrived in Guam with special ship salvage and recovery equipment to stabilize the ship pierside as soon as possible. The team, led by Captain Charles Doty, commenced a seaworthiness and repair assessment upon the ship’s arrival. Once additional buoyancy measures are in place and tested satisfactory, the Low Pressure Blower will be secured to allow divers to enter the water to conduct an inspection.

While this grounding is a tragedy, with a through investigation led by Cecil Haney, we will find out all the facts and then ensure we learn from the mistakes. But, I too believe we have much to be thankful for today, and much to be confident in. An operational warship has returned to port on her own power with all but one of its crew after sustaining major hull damage.

The survival of the ship after such an incredibly hard grounding (nearly instantaneous deceleration from Flank Speed to 4 KTS) is a credit to the ship design engineers and our day-to-day engineering and watch standing practices. The continuous operation of the propulsion plant, electrical systems and navigation demonstrates the reliability of our equipment and the operational readiness of our crews as a whole. The impressive Joint and Navy team effort which resulted in SFO returning to port safely says volumes about the ingenuity and resourcefulness of all our armed services. For all who participated in this effort, thank you and your people. We are all eternally grateful to each of you.

Could you get this posted, please? Those of use who rode these ships understand only too well what happened on the 8th, but this is a very coherent account of the incident. The death of the young 2nd class petty officer will be especially hard for the crew, because we always think in terms of one die, all die; we never are prepared for losing a single shipmate.

Thanks
Boyd G.

PS: This document has been released for distribution by the Navy. I just got back confirmation.

12. January 2005 · Comments Off on A Victory In The Evil War On Drugs · Categories: General

The Supremes have shot down federal manditory sentences which have for years placed drug offenders in prison for longer terms than violent criminals:

The justices, ruling 5-4 in two drug cases, said the guidelines violate the constitutional jury-trial right by forcing judges to increase the range of possible sentences based on their own factual findings. By a separate 5-4 majority, the court said the guidelines will no longer be mandatory for judges and instead will be “effectively advisory.”

[…]

The cases are U.S. v. Booker, 04-104, and U.S. v. Fanfan, 04- 105.

Expect those convicted of drug offenses, as well as white-collar criminals, to swamp the courts with motions for sentence reconsideration. Also, expect Congress to draft up some new way to “get tough”:

“Ours, of course, is not the last word,” Breyer wrote. “The ball now lies in Congress’s court.”

12. January 2005 · Comments Off on A New Low-Cost Mac · Categories: General

MacMini

Apple has introduced a $499 Macintosh. But closer examination reveals it’s not quite as good a deal as it sounds:

The Mac Mini is a complete Macintosh system not much longer or wider than a compact disc, and shorter than an iPod Mini at only two inches. It features two versions of Apple’s G4 processor, a generation behind the G5 processor currently shipping in Power Macs and iMacs.

Apple will release two versions of the Mac Mini on Jan. 22. The least expensive model will cost $499 and offers a 1.25GHz G4 processor, 256MB of PC2700 (333MHz) DDR (double data rate) SDRAM (synchronous dynamic RAM), a 40GB hard drive, a DVD-ROM/CD-RW optical drive and a Radeon 9200 graphics processor from ATI Technologies Inc. The other model costs $599 and offers a 1.42GHz processor and an 80GB hard drive.

Nor does it come with a monitor, keyboard or mouse.

11. January 2005 · Comments Off on More Heads To Roll At CBS · Categories: General

Newsweek’s Howard Fineman has just said on MSNBC’s Scarborough Country, that more heads, including that of Andrew Heywood, are to roll at CBS. Stay tuned.

11. January 2005 · Comments Off on Ah I’m right! · Categories: General

Just now, on Fox News’ Special Report With Brit Hume, It was announced that the Memogate scandal first came out not as a post on Powerline or Little Green Footballs, but a post on the BBS, FreeRepublic.com. Kudos for the BBS format, and vindication for me.

11. January 2005 · Comments Off on Bound Down With Anchor Chains · Categories: General, Media Matters Not

The actual report on the Dan Rather/60 Minutes/Memogate fiasco seems like a bit of a hiccup after the fact, an anti-climax, now that our election is over and JFK part Deux returned to richly deserved near-obscurity on the national scene. Events have overtaken it; with over 150,000 dead following the Indian Ocean tsunami, and the Iraqi elections coming up at the end of the month… the moving finger of history moves on, leaving gleeful humorists to make biting references to “Gunga Dan” and the “See BS Network”, and wondering if “anchor”— as in something heavy and leaden, dragging everything else down into the watery muck— might be the appropriate word after all.

At least with the dust somewhat settled, and with the results of an in-house investigation in hand, it can be seen that once again, as James Fallows observed so cogently in “Breaking the News: How the Media Undermines American Democracy”, a reporter is never so apt to get the whole thing wrong as when he or she goes into a story already assuming they know the end of it. Or as Stephen Den Beste (pause to genuflect, deeply) in the comments here termed it “Conclusion first, evidence later”.
It is the nature of serious reporting to dig, to search out the useful and relevant facts of a story, and to pursue with diligence— it can be a good thing to be a bit monomaniacal about something you believe in. Persistence is a good thing, sticking with it in the face of odds is admirable and expected, but…

And this is the big “but”— maintaining your belief in something incredible by discarding every iota of contradictory evidence, especially concerning a matter in which you have no personal expertise, even to the point of disregarding the advice of those who do— that is folly. It is forgivable, or at least understandable as a personal quirk in someone who reads their horoscope in the newspaper, or believes in herbal medicines. It is not something that we as a free people can overlook when committed by a member in good standing of the major media clerisy. When the evidence for a major story can be thoroughly dismembered, and discounted as so much trash and fakery and wishful thinking, and Dan Rather and what was once a major and respected news source can be left like the Emperor, standing in knock-kneed and unseemly nakedness, it is proof that as far as the news business goes the moving finger is indeed moving on. News we can use? It looks like we’ll have to do it ourselves. James Fallows ought to be pleased, at any rate.

And as for major media melt-down, it has happened before, and not all that long ago, either: Big, well-hyped story, fronted by well respected reporter? Check. Undone by
veterans and other experts getting in touch through the internet? Been there. TV producer relying on wishful thinking, dodgy evidence, and discounting every indication to the contrary? Done that.
Only, we get pajamas, instead of a tee-shirt.

10. January 2005 · Comments Off on And This Week’s Idiotarian Award Goes To… · Categories: General

… Fox News’ Bill O’Reilly. In an interview with Ann Coulter on tonight’s The O’Reilly Factor, he claimed that Japan “has no military,” and relies upon the United States for it’s defense.

Wrong, Bill. While Japan’s military forces are strictly defensive in nature. They have a very formidable military. In fact, their defense budget is second only to the United States.

10. January 2005 · Comments Off on Swept Away · Categories: General, World

Of all the appalling things about the tsunami in the Indian Ocean, the thing that is the most horrifying to me— after the horrific loss of life, and knowing that after two weeks those who are missing are most likely dead, and that many localities were so thoroughly swamped that there is no one left to report the others missing, no one who will ever come and pick out someone among the pictures of the known dead, and so many of the bodies will never be found at all— are the pictures and accounts of people going out onto the sand flats to look at the fish flopping around, and the pools of water left, when the sea mysteriously and unaccountably withdrew.

There are accounts, here and here, and here, of a few people (and even animals) who knew what it portended, and either fled in good order or raised an alarm, but I am left somewhat boggled at how few people recognized the signs and portents. It is something I have know for so long that I cannot remember first being told it; that if the ocean tide ever, ever unaccountably pulls out— gone, vanished, fish left flopping, no water left— than you should run, run as fast as you can, as far as you can, inland, to the highest farthest bit of ground you can get to, because all that water will come back, crashing down in the biggest wave imaginable. This is knowledge on the order of “bears crap in the woods” and “the Pope is Catholic” sort of thing, even “lost in the woods, follow a watercourse downstream” sort of general basic survival knowledge. Or so I thought.

A quick poll of my nearest and dearest and assorted acquaintances give mixed results; William, Dad, my daughter, all knew this, three or four of my co-workers— all Texas natives— didn’t. I can chalk it up to a general scientific interest, or having lived in a coastal, seismically active places… but still… I thought this was just one those these things that people just knew. Especially if you lived close to the ocean. Readers thoughts on this: did you know, before December 26th this year, that if the tide suddenly and unaccountably runs out, that this means danger so profound that you should drop what you are doing and run for your life?

10. January 2005 · Comments Off on Ok, Tank Guys · Categories: General

I’m currently watching a History Channel show on stealth. And they are saying the M1A2 “can roar across the desert at almost 45 mph.” What? I thought the Abrams was good for over 50, flat out. But I’ve checked several sources, and it seems top speed is “governed” to 42. What’s up?

Update: It is to laugh. On the same program, they are talking about the Future Warrior project. And some brainiac is saying “the day may come when a soldier can punch a code into his suit, and make it adapt to any enviroment.” What? When that day comes, the suit will be smart enough to adapt on its own. Idiots – we are led by idiots.

09. January 2005 · Comments Off on Good Home (s) Wanted · Categories: General

One of my co-workers at the public radio station where I moonlight on Saturdays is as much of a sucker for our dumb chums as I am (What??!! Is that possible?— yes it is, pipe down!) and is looking for homes for a quartet of kittens which she rescued from short and miserable lives on the street. She is not looking with all that much energy, and she is much too young to be the stereotypical cat lady. The kittens are now about seven to nine months old, at about the last point where they could easily adapt to a new home. They are feline HIV negative, free of feline leukemia, neutered and vaccinated, and acclimated to living indoors. Two are calico females, one is an orange long-haired male, and the fourth is a short haired white-and-orange-trim male. They are also used to dogs and other cats. If interested, contact diane@tpr.org. and be prepared to make a good case for her judicious consideration.
Alas, I have no charming pictures— use your imagination!

08. January 2005 · Comments Off on It’s 1936… · Categories: General, History

… You have more money than Midas. You are looking for a new car – a sporting cabriolet. What would you buy?

This is an interesting question. Despite the worldwide depression, there was a wealth of spectacular (for their day) high-end automobiles available. Just consider: the Blower Bentley, the Mercedes 540K Special Roadster, the Hispano-Suiza J-12, the Type 57 Bugatti, the Cadillac 36-60/90, the Talbot-Lago T150C SS, the Isotta-Fraschini Tipo 8B, the Maybach SW38, and, of course, the Duesenburg SSJ.

Well, the Cadillac and the Bentley can really be considered “second tier” automobiles. [It’s sad to say, my Limey friends, but in-between the Silver Ghost and the VW/BMW takeover, Rolls-Royce produced some relatively crude automobiles (great aircraft engines though)] Further, the Cadillac, the Isotta-Fraschinis, the Maybach, and the Hispano-Suiza were really more touring than sports cars (there were some exceptions, witness the ’37 Dubonnet Hispano.).

The Talbot, and particularly the Bugatti, are both spectacular examples of industrial craftsmanship – every facet finished to perfection. However, while the Talbots were by-and-large particularly beautiful, the 57s, with exception of the stunning Atlantic coupes (only 3 made), were some of the most ungainly Bugattis ever produced. For myself, iconoclast that I am, these cars would have a strong pull for me. But my practical side would not be unaware that these were really “small” and “delicate” cars for their age – not really the ticket for America’s [non] roads.

This brings us to the Mercedes and the Duesy. This is a tough choice. To me, there are few pre-war cars more beautiful than Jack Warner’s 540K Special Roadster (only 6 “hidden spare” models were built, IIRC). But Gary Cooper’s SSJ comes close (also IIRC, only 2 SSJs were ever built). On paper, you had that marvelous Duesenburg engine vs. that futuristic Mercedes chassis. But, in reality, while there are very few who have driven a 540K, ask anybody who’s driven a 300SL coupe, a Porsche 356 or early 911/912, or for that matter, a VW Bug or a MUTT – those swing-axle rear ends aren’t what they are cracked up to be.

In the end, it comes down to this: The Benz was a 105mph car, the Duesy would do 140+. I know what I’d choose.

Update: Well this is the last time I waste my time on an extendeded classic car post on you people. Not one comment? Not even to mention my omission of the spectacular Delahaye? Jeeze. (j/k – As I don’t make a dime on this, if I did it to please the unwashed masses, I wouldn’t do it.).

07. January 2005 · Comments Off on This Seems Like A Cool Site · Categories: General

If you are like me, you miss the good-ol’ Army-Navy surplus store. I seem to have found one online here, at Brigade Quartermasters. Please note that this is not an endorsement. I have yet to buy anything from them. But I likely will in the near future, unless I hear something bad about them in the meantime. If you know anything about them, or any similar online mil-gear suppliers, please comment.

Oh, and check their Bargain Bunker;. Looks like a great price on camo parkas and Zeiss binoculars (still expensive, but they are Zeiss, after all).

Oh, and I am still looking for a good source of surplus aircraft hardware (fasteners, cable, electrical components, etc.). If you know of any, please comment.

07. January 2005 · Comments Off on All Hail, to Sparkey! · Categories: General, Site News

Canny and wisest among engineers, who over last weekend installed certain software plug-ins to repel the disgusting deluge of spam-comments! The latest deluge has been unleashed upon us (they must be on some sort of regular schedule) and not one of the disgusting things has been posted onto the weblog! It is most especially marvellous, because a record-breaking number of 685 over the last to hours, of the most disgusting comments ever created by the mind of … well, whomever… has just been attempted to post to this weblog and not one of them has made it any farther than my hotmail inbox!
Well done, Sparkey! (Gilbert and Sullivan mode on)

Let’s hear three cheers! I’ll lead the way!
Hurrah! Hurrah! Hurray!

(Gilbert and Sullivan mode off)

Carry on… (I had a post about the Roger Tory Peterson Guide to Identifying Members of the Military to finish, but I left the floppy at work. Sorry. Finish on Monday. E-mail me or comment if you have any useful tips by which members of the various services can be differentiated from each other.)

07. January 2005 · Comments Off on Let’s Play The Name Game · Categories: General

Well, it seems it’s not Pork anymore, it’s PORC.

Consider Maurice Johannessen, a legislator from far Northern California until his Senate term ended two years ago. Johannessen was one of a handful of Republicans who regularly bolted from his party to help Democrats get state budgets passed. That’s how he became a master at delivering to folks back home what he called “district augmentations” and others describe as Projects of Regional Concern — PORC for short.

ROTFL