25. May 2005 · Comments Off on Take A Break and Go Flying! · Categories: General

Guess who's driving...

Guess who’s driving? Last week before getting my foot cut on, I had to go over and do pre-op stuff the day before. It was a great day to fly!

Know what that big fan up front does? IT KEEPS THE PILOT COOL!

May 05 Best Picks 014

Outta action for a month or so, but when I get this cement block off my foot, off we go!

Whoever re-wrote the codes for posting pics has my undying gratitude. We got a digital camera last week and it is just too much fun!

24. May 2005 · Comments Off on A Cool Resource · Categories: General, History

I’ve been doing a little research of late into the origins of modern guerilla warfare. In studying the Napoleonic conquest of Spain, and subsequent resistance, I’ve stumbled upon a little treasure-trove called the War Times Journal – a site targeted on hard-core strat-sim gamers. There’s a lot of good stuff in here; I’m currently perusing the memoirs of Marshal Louis-Gabriel Suchet.

24. May 2005 · Comments Off on My Dream Movie Epic: To Truckee’s River · Categories: General, History, Media Matters Not

(This is part 4 of my dream movie epic, about the early wagon-train emigrant party of which hardly anyone has ever heard)

The eleven wagons led by Elisha Stephens and guided by Greenwood, the old trapper and mountain-man struck off the main trail in the middle of August, following the wheel tracks of a group led the previous year by another mountain man and explorer, the legendary Joseph Walker. Walker’s party had followed the Humboldt River, a sluggish trickle of a river which eventually petered out in a sandy desert basin well short of the mountains. They had been unable to find a pass leading up into the Sierra Nevada, had gone south and eventually abandoned their wagons near Owens Lake, reaching California by going around the mountains entirely. This was a desperate and impractical solution for the Stephens Party.

They camped by the desert marsh; experienced frontier hands Greenwood and Hitchcock were convinced there had to be a way up into the Sierra, more or less directly west of where they were camped, and they consulted, mountain-man fashion with a curious, but seemingly friendly old Indian man who wandered into camp. They may not have known it at the time, but the old Indian was the chief of the Piute tribe, and had made the acquaintance of the explorer John C. Fremont— traveling into California with Fremont, even— and made it tribal policy to be courteous and friendly to those settlers and explorers passing through Piute lands. Communication seems to have been through sign language, and pantomime. Was there a pass into the mountain-range? Greenwood or Hitchcock modeled a range of mountains in the sand at their feet and pointed at the real mountains. The old Indian looked at it thoughtfully, and carefully remodeled the sand range to show a small river running down between two. Could there be a gateway through the mountains?

He seemed quite positive there was, and the next day he rode ahead towards the distant mountains with Greenwood and Stephens, while the rest of the party rested and waited for the scouting party to return. When they did, they brought the good news— there was a river, coming down into the desert, cutting a passable gateway— and the bad news— it was a hard journey across barren desert, and no water at all save for a small, bad-tasting hot-spring halfway there. Careful preparations were made; every thing that could be made water-tight was filled to the brim. They cut armfuls of green rushes and brush as fodder for the cattle and their few horses. Some accounts have them deciding to start across the desert at sundown, and just to keep going, all night, the next day, and into the next night. Take advantage of the night’s cool temperatures, minimize the need for water and get out of the desert as soon as possible. As much water as possible would be reserved for the oxen, on whose strength and pulling power survival depended. Perhaps the smallest children would be tucked up in the wagons for the grueling trek; everyone else would walk, stumbling half-asleep under a desert moon.

Dawn, morning, day… still moving. Riders led their horses to spare them; the march only paused to water the oxen, and pass around some cold biscuits and dried meat by way of food for the people. At the hot spring in the middle of the desert, the animals drink, but not with any relish. They are fed with the green rushes brought from the last camping place. The emigrants rest in the shade of their wagons for a few hours in the hottest part of the day, resuming as the heat of the day fades. Sometime early the next morning, the weary, thirsty oxen begin perking up, stepping a little faster. The wind coming down from the mountains is bringing the scent of fresh water. There is a very real danger to the wagons, if the teamsters cannot control them. Hastily, the men draw the wagons together and unhitch the teams: better for them to run loose to the water they can smell, than risk damaging the wagons in a maddened stampede. In a few hours, the men return with the teams, sated and sodden with all the water they can drink from the old Indian’s river.

It is the most beautiful river anyone has ever seen, spilling down from the mountains, cold with the chill of snow-melt even in fall, even more beautiful after the desert. All the way on that first scout, the old Indian kept saying a word which sounded like “tro-kay” to Greenwood and Stephens; it actually means “all right” or “very well”, but they assumed it was his name, and baptized the river accordingly as the Truckee River. They follow it towards the looming mountains, hurrying on a little, because it is now October. At mid-month they are camped in meadowlands, just below where the canyon cuts deep through the mountains, the last but most difficult part of the journey. There is already snow on the ground, and they have come to where a creek joins Truckee’s River. The creek-bed looks to be easier for the wagons to follow farther up into the mountain pass, but the river might be more direct. The decision is made to send a small, fast-moving party along the river, six of the fittest and strongest, on horseback with enough supplies, to move quickly and bring help and additional supplies from Sutter’s Fort. Four men and two women, including Elizabeth Townsend ride out on the 14th of November, 1844.

(To be continued)

23. May 2005 · Comments Off on 100 Things About Me (1-5) · Categories: General

Because a friend of mine says I’m interesting…I’ll let you decide.

1. From the age of 14 through 20 I was a volunteer on crises hotlines and the National Runaway Switchboard. That’s not a typo, I was fourteen when I started talking to overdosers and runaways and drunks and suicides, and bad trippers. Yes, I think the folks in charge were crazy. No, I wouldn’t give up the experiences for anything. I quit doing it after I couldn’t talk a kid into calling an ambulance for him and his friend because they were more afraid of going home than they were of their pimp who had beat them silly. The one I was talking to had my hotline name and number in his pocket when the cops found their bodies. I know there was nothing more I could do, but I believed at the time there was something I SHOULD have been able to do…which is why I left. I was starting to think I was more powerful than I was and that’s a very bad thing.

2. From the age of 14-18 I worked at a coffee house running the soundboard on Saturday Nights. This is where I developed my loathing for the songs, “Sandman,” “You’ve Got a Friend,” “All Along the Watchtower,” and the first few notes of “Stairway to Heaven” and “Roundabout.”

3. While I was doing those things I also worked for money at a local drugstore, making deliveries and working the cash register. When I think of the weather I rode that bicycle through…I’m amazed I never got killed.

4. I also worked as a mover in high school but somehow managed to never go union.

5. Although my neighborhood had Howard Street Grease, Thorndale J*g-Offs (TJO), and Latin Kings, I managed to never join a gang or get messed up by a gang-banger. I’m rather proud of that. Jimmy Camanchero doesn’t count, that was a draw, and we walked away not friends, but no longer wanting to kill one another.

23. May 2005 · Comments Off on Horsepistal Blogging · Categories: General

Well, here I sit, on the side of the bed, IV running, hooked up by phone line and running through AOL. The surgery on Friday went very well, and I have some weird-looking device on my left leg that Nurse Jenny says is a “cam-walker.” It’s sorta like a boot that goes up to the knee. But I can’t yet put any weight on the left leg. I’ve been up, on a walker, hopping up and down the hall like a wounded rabbit, trying to get myself broke outta this place! They say I can go tomorrow. Don’t know how long before I’ll be able to outrun Nurse Jenny, but all in time…..*sigh*

I have been up a couple of times, just reading, but today I felt I could say HI to all my friends here, it won’t be long until I can find something to start another fire about.

God bless, folks, be back soon. Time for the dilaudid and zzzzz.zzzz

Update 5/24: Bustin’ out day. The doc says go home, so I ain’t letting the door hit me in…..you guessed…..

Thanks for all the kind words, and Kayse, I got out some shorts and ditched the ventilated gown, the world couldn’t stand that sight!

See y’all from home next time!

UPDATE 200505250600Z: Yeaaa! Home in my own bed! BTW Kevin, I had to leave the dilaudid behind,and yes, the doc was kind enough to keep me out of postop pain. Actually, right now I don’t have any pain.

OK, back to bedybye…..

23. May 2005 · Comments Off on Memo: Combat Camera · Categories: General, Iraq, Media Matters Not, Military

“Journalists, in contrast, generally have invoked their responsibility as witnesses — believing they must provide an unsanitized portrait of combat…

Tyler Hicks of the New York Times and Carolyn Cole of the Los Angeles Times accompanied the Army in August during the dangerous assault on the insurgent stronghold of Najaf. They weathered several life-threatening episodes with the troops. But much of the respect they gained disappeared when the two tried to take pictures of wounded and dead soldiers being rushed to a field hospital.

Cole, a Pulitzer winner for photographs she took of the war in Liberia, said later she understood the soldiers’ high emotions. But she resented the row of soldiers blocking her camera, who in her view prevented her from doing her job.

“They were happy to have us along when we could show them fighting the battle, show the courageous side of them,” Cole said. “Then suddenly the tables turned. They didn’t want anything shown of their grief and what was happening on the negative side, which is equally important.” (From the infamous LA Times story, which ran in my local paper this weekend)

To: Mainstream News Media (Photog/Video Division)
From: Sgt Mom
Re: Combat Camera

1. There is a bitter joke about news photographers, which goes roughly “If you have a choice between jumping in and saving a small child from drowning, or taking a Pulitzer-prize winning photograph of a child, drowning… what kind of film do you use?” In other words, where does your duty as a compassionate, involved human being intersect with your passion and your day job as a photographer, and which is your first obligation?

2. It would seem that some of those have chosen the second, but wish to have the moral credit for the first, at least as far as taking pictures of the US military in action is concerned. As was so clearly made plain in the infamous TV segment of “Ethics in America” referenced in James Fallows’ “Breaking the News”, top-of-the-line TV reporters Mike Wallace and Peter Jennings would see it as their duty to watch an American military unit be ambushed by an enemy force, and impartially record the results. So… for the past thirty or forty years, the media has preached their obligation to be impartial, to be an uninvolved witness… but touchingly, have also assumed that they ought to have the access, and the emotional wallop of doing Ernie Pyle-type reportage when it comes to the American troops.

3. How f**king clueless can the major media representatives be? Oh, let me count the ways; it’s as if our troops, our sons and daughters are assumed to be some sort of participants in some bizarre reality TV program, that every jot and tittle of their lives (and deaths) is to be on display to a TV cameraman, or still photographer who swoops in to spend a couple of weeks with the troops, and then swoops out again. That single shocking image is out there, without context, without explanation, just there. Ms Cole sees her job as simply to provide them, and her petulance at not being allowed to do so is absolutely jaw dropping. Of how horrifying it would be to parents, loved ones and friends on the other side of the world to see such pictures flashed up on the front page or on the TV news never seems to have entered into consideration. To have the life of your child summed up for all time in a single shocking image of them, injured or dead… just to kick an old news media outlet a little higher in the ratings and add another notch to the eventual Pulitzer nomination, or serve as someone’s political rallying point is the ultimate obscenity. I am not the least surprised that Ms. Cole and Mr. Hicks were shunned; most people do have a thing about being exploited, and prefer being exploited on their terms.

4. I do not mean to include print journalists in this excoriation, the best of whom truely do worship at the shrine of Ernie Pyle. They manage to do their job, quietly and unobtrusively scribbling away in a notebook, usually after the smoke is cleared and the emergency over. A written account of an event is… well, a written account. There is thought, context, a choice of words, an organization in the act of writing. In most cases, print journalists are not standing up and doing it in the middle of stuff hitting the fan. There also exist photographers and videographers who have been embedded with the military on a long term basis, who live with the troops, eat the same rations, experience the same conditions and have an extraordinary grasp of the niceties of military operations, and the feelings of the front-line troops. They are the combat camera specialists, military videographers and photographers enlisted in the various services. They may not get the red-hot Pulitzer-prize winning stuff, but at least they can do their job without pissing off the soldiers or Marines they are embedded with.

5. Finally, I would ask of those journalists and photographers who don’t think there have been enough pictures of dead and wounded soldiers and Marines coming out of Iraq; do you intend now to publish recognizable pictures of the bodies of dead journalists and photographers?

Sincerely
Sgt. Mom

(More at Mudville Gazette)

22. May 2005 · Comments Off on Four downs, six downs, whatever… · Categories: General

[begin shameless self-promotion]
Besides my occasional posting here at the Daily Brief (which finally picked up again after too long of a hiatus), I’ve started my own blog: Ticklish Ears (www.ticklishears.com). I’ll continue to post here at The Brief on military stuff, hot-potato political items, and other general nonsense. At Ticklish Ears, I’ll focus more on cultural, religious, and academic issues as seen through the eyes of a conservative, evangelical college professor. I hope you’ll check it out.

I thought today was a good day to introduce my alter-ego since I’ve got an item over there that might be of interest. It concerns a math word problem that appeared on a statewide seventh-grade end of year test . Apparently, some of our educators don’t understand how the game of football is played (State Math Test Drops the Ball on Football Question).
[end shameless self-promotion]

22. May 2005 · Comments Off on My Movie Dream Epic: On the Emigrant Trail · Categories: General, History, Media Matters Not

(Part 3 of the movie epic I wish could be made)

Fifteen miles a day, more or less; the inexorable calculus of the overland trails. The wagon trains can only move out in late May, when the prairie grass is grown tall enough to feed the draft animals. And they must be over the last palisade of the high Sierra Nevada before the way is blocked by the winter snow. And they must do so before their food supplies run out. Any one of a hundred miscalculations, missteps or misfortunes can upset that careful arithmetic and bring disaster upon all. Is the water in that creek running fast and high? Can it be forded, or should the wagons carefully and laboriously be ferried over. An accident to a wagon, the loss of any of the supplies, an ox-team felled by disease or accident may be compounded later on. Balance taking a day to cross a high-water creek, against a day six months in the future and an early snow fall in the Sierras. Balance sparing a day camping by a pleasant spring of clear water, and the men going to hunt for meat, that when dried over the fire and stored away, might mean the difference between a nourishing meal by an ice-water lake half a continent away, and starvation in that place instead.

All accounts of the emigrant trail agree, some of them very lyrically, that the first weeks out on the trail are the most pleasant. Dr. Townsend’s journal, as he was nominated the secretary from the Stephens Party, is long gone, but many others remain. The prairie grass is lush and green, the land gently rolling. The oxen are healthy and rested, the burden of travel not onerous. Elderly men and women in San Jose, or Portland, penning their memoirs early in the 20th century will look back on it as the most marvelous adventure of their childhood; running barefoot in the green grass, the white canvas wagon-top silhouetted at the top of a gentle rise against a blue, blue sky, meals around a campfire, and sleeping under the stars. They will remember seeing herds of buffalo, a sea of brown woolly backs as far as the horizon goes, the trick of scrambling up from the ground over a slow-moving wagon-wheel, and how the wagon jolted over every little rock and rut. They will remember the look of the Platte River, wide and shallow— and inch thick and a mile wide, so it was said, and how they also said it was too thick to drink and too thin to plough. For small children, alive in the immediate day to day present, and innocently trusting their parents as all-wise, all-capable beings, those first weeks on the trail could only be a grand adventure, an endless picnic excursion, with something new and wonderful always around the next bend.

For their mothers, it was a picnic well stocked with ants, and dust and the endless chore of cooking over an open fire, of setting up camp every night, and unrolling the bedding, or carrying buckets of fresh water… and that after an exhausting day of either walking alongside the wagon or riding in it. Women’s work on a farm in those days was grueling enough by our standards, but in the settled lands they had left there was a community, family, friends, an orderly routine. These eight women, and the older girls would have formed their own little community; discovering again that a bucket of milk hung from the wagon-box in the morning would have churned itself into a small lump of butter at the end of the days’ journey, and dried beans left to soak overnight in the dying heat of the evening campfire would be ready to cook the next morning. How to contrive meals out of cornmeal and flour, dried beans, dried fruit, salt-pork, how to do at least a minimal laundry along the trail, how to glean edible greens and wild plums from the thickets in the creek bottoms. The presence of Dr. Townsend, with his medical expertise, and small range of surgical kit must have also been very reassuring, most especially as the party reached the landmark of Independence Rock, shortly before July 4th. There, Mrs. James Miller gave birth to a baby daughter, named Ellen Independence Miller. When the party moved on towards the distant Rocky Mountains and Fort Hall (in what is now Idaho) , it was on a shortcut of Isaac Greenwood’s suggesting. It would later be called “Sublette’s Cutoff” and it saved them five days of travel.

The westbound trail split at Fort Hall. From then on, the Murphys, the Townsends, the Millers and their infant daughter, Old Hitchcock and his daughter, and all the others would be on their own, and finding their own trail in the faintest of traces left from wagons who attempted the California route the year before.

(To be continued)

21. May 2005 · Comments Off on British Army Amarillo Video · Categories: General

A must see at The TTR2 Blog (hat tip: Jackson’s Junction).

Go there! Now!

20. May 2005 · Comments Off on At the Movies: The Great Adventure · Categories: General, History, Media Matters Not

(Part 2, of the story I would like to see as the epic movie I wish they would make, but probably won’t)

In the year 1844, these United States, for all intents and purposes, extended from the Atlantic seaboard to the Mississippi/Missouri River. And west of the rivers, two-thirds of the continental territories theoretically American were an unknown quantity. Desert, high plains, mountains, rivers… only a bare handful of explorers, missionaries and fur trappers had ever seen for sure what lay beyond the jumping-off point at Council Bluffs, Independence, St. Joseph. There was a slender and perilous established overland trail to Santa Fe, and beyond that to the thinly-populated enclave of Spanish and then Mexican territories in California. That trail wound through the scrub and deserts of the Southwest, traveled mostly by professional traders and merchants, heavily armed and escorting great lumbering Conestoga wagons packed with profitable trade goods: fabrics and glass, gunpowder and tools, for the markets in Santa Fe, and the outlaying pueblos. They were businessmen, with little interest in lingering, since most of the route lay though desert.

There was another trail, also— a northern track which followed along the Platte River, through deserts and mountains, and eventually terminated in Oregon. Lewis and Clarke, the fur-trapping brigades… all had gone that way, by boat, on horseback and on foot. Hearing of the rich lands in the Pacific Northwest, farmers and small tradesmen had begun to follow the siren call, also. An agricultural depression, epidemics of malaria and yellow-fever, a bit of manifest destiny, ambition and just plain restlessness no doubt played a part.

Families across what is now the middle-west sold off land and assets; this was not a journey for the impoverished, or the reckless. Aside from a wagon, and stock to pull it, these adventurers would have to bring along supplies for six months, tools, clothes, bedding and cooking gear, spare parts for the wagon, perhaps seeds and roots to plant a new garden in the Willamette Valley, or by Sutter’s Fort in far California. There might be some little space in the wagon for some books, and china and other small treasures, for the wagons were small, and food took up most of the space. The larger wagons, purpose-built for the trail were about four feet wide, ten to twelve feet long, covered with waterproofed canvas, spread over four or five arched hickory bows, although many families made do with ordinary farm wagons, fitted out with a cover. The draft animal of choice was not the horse, as many would think. Horses were expensive, and the road was rough, too rough in the early days for even the toughest horse in dray harness. Mules made a good showing on the southern trail, but they were expensive. Most emigrants could better afford ox teams; four to six pair to a wagon, patient and plodding, guided by a driver who walked by the lead team and shouted verbal commands.

The wagons rolled on metal-tired wheels; there was no suspension system, no springs. Most emigrants walked, by choice, rather than endure jolting along in a wagon. It would take six months, easily… and in the early days there was no known road, and only two or three outposts all along that way to buy additional supplies, or to mail a letter. The pioneers looked out from the noisy clamor of St. Joseph, and Independence, and Council Bluffs, at last years tracks and ruts, overgrown with the new grass that would feed their ox teams on the first part of the journey, as soon as it was grown tall enough… at wilderness. They would step off the safe perch, on the riverbank at the edge of civilization, and swing out like a trapeze artist across the vast, emptiness, guided by their own good sense, and hard work, faith and hope and no little amount of luck… but they would not go alone. Late in of May, 1844 such a party of emigrants stepped off from Council Bluffs, in company with a larger party bound for Oregon. Ten families, with as many (or a few more) wagons, with all their stock and worldly goods had elected an ex-trapper and blacksmith named Elisha Stephens as their own leader, and intended to strike off the established trail at Fort Hall, and head for California.

All the other archetypal western stories are almost exclusively male domains. The writer of a romantic yard about cowboys and the open range, the Gold Rush, the mountain men, or the fighting cavalry, must go to great length to import an adventurous school-marm or a tart. But the emigrant wagon trains, the great Mormon migration, and the post-Civil War homesteaders, they were all family matters. Stephen’s party of fifty souls included eight women and fifteen children. A little under half of them were an extended clan: Martin Murphy, and his three sons, with their wives and children. Martin Murphy himself had emigrated from Ireland, to Canada, and then to Missouri. His wife and three grandchildren had died in a malaria epidemic; the clan sought a healthier climate, and Martin Murphy thought all the better of California— still held by Mexico— for it being nominally a Catholic country. Dr. John Townsend, very possibly the most educated person in the party, also looked to a healthier climate; his wife, Elizabeth was supposed to be in frail health. Elizabeth Townsend’s orphaned younger brother, Moses Schallenberger, counted as a man for this journey, at the age of 17. The teenaged half-Indian sons of Caleb Greenwood probably also counted as men. Caleb Greenwood had roamed all over the Rockies as a fur-trapper, twenty years before. Greenwood was thought to be in his eighties, but still hale and vigorous. Another old mountain-man, Isaac Hitchcock also felt the lure of the west, traveling with his oldest daughter and her children.

None of these men; Stephens, Greenwood or Hitchock had been all along the trail to California, although it is thought that Stephens may have had been on the Santa Fe Trail. He seems also to have been enormously respected by the other men; there were none of the bitter divisions that fractured other parties, under the stress of moving the heavy-laden wagons an inexorable fifteen miles a day, and chivvying the stock herd, finding water and safe pasturage, of being dusty and exhausted and hungry, day after grinding day, and knowing that the hardest part of the journey was at the end of it.

(Next: On the Trail)

19. May 2005 · Comments Off on The Appointment-Setter’s Lament · Categories: Domestic, General, Military

(Frequent commenter J.S. Allison sent this, to be posted whenever… enjoy!— Sgt. Mom)

I work in central appointments for a military medical treatment facility and I’m tired. How tired? Let me list the ways:

1. Cell phones are wonderful; the microphones are so sensitive that I can hear everyone and everything within 100 feet of you when you call. Yes, I can tell that you’re in the bathroom, I’d really rather not.

2. Put down the Gameboy while you’re on the phone. At least pretend that this transaction actually matters to you. You called us, remember?

3. Put down the kid while you’re on the phone, especially if it’s screaming. It’s not going to get the kid in any sooner. See #1 above.

4. Multi-tasking is a myth. You’re not equipped to pull it off so stop it.

5. I generally will have somewhere between 5-12 people on queue waiting for me to help them during busy times, so make it march. I’m not being rude, I just realize that there are folk waiting that possibly actually need help so I’m going to try to move the call along as much as practical.

6. If you don’t know why you’re calling, hang up. Better yet, don’t call. I’m not psychic. I’m not taking a test, so spell it out.

7. You called us. That implies that you want something. Making it easier to help you gets you helped, making it harder gets you hung up on on my bad days and definitely reduces any inclination I might have to flexibility.

8. After spending several minutes going on about how desperately your child needs to be seen right away, do not, *DO NOT* ask me for a later appointment because your child is napping, or still in school and you don’t want to get them out. You don’t want to hear what you’ll be hearing next. And no, I won’t get fired over it. Can you say tenure? I knew you could.

9. There are only so many appointments available per day per doctor that are after school. Everybody else wants them too. Don’t expect them to still be available at 2 p.m.

10. I really don’t care that the 0720 appointment is inconvenient, set your alarm. I have to wake up at 0530 every day to get to work on time, how convenient is that?

11. You are the parent, pick the kid up, put it in the carrier, and bring it in. If it’s a self-propelled model you’re still the parent and are potentially bigger and meaner than the kid, bring it in.

12. Don’t delay the treatment of one or more of your kids so you can bring in the whole litter all at once. Oh yeah, on that whole bringing in the whole litter thing, bring another adult to keep an eye on the kids that aren’t being seen. Better yet, leave them home with said adult.

13. On the subject of making it easier to help, once you’ve turned down a few appointment times, tell me what times would be acceptable so we can quit wasting time with twenty questions, better yet, tell me from the outset.

14. This is a military medical treatment facility. As such the first priority goes to active duty military. This isn’t an issue in pediatrics (though it seems it ought to be at times…). However, in the specialty clinics, once the active duty population has been taken care of, dependents and retirees on TRICARE Prime (and other variants who are also paying a quarterly premium) have next call on available resources. Everyone else (who are not paying any premium, btw) get to pick over what’s left. Sorry, but that’s how it is. If you’re not willing to cough up for the Prime premiums get used to paying the copay downtown because your chances of being seen on base range from not much to even less depending upon the particular clinic. You can keep calling everyday, you’re not going to annoy me into giving up an appointment, there are no appointments to give and you’re only delaying your treatment.

15. It is frequently the case that after spending a couple of minutes finding and booking an appointment that the caller will, immediately following the final key press to book the appointment, ask if there’s anything later/earlier/tastier/less filling. The grinding you hear through the phone at that point is my dentures as you now want me to undo everything that was just done, and do it over. This happens at least a dozen times a day, if not more. I know, it’s not your fault but after a bunch of these, well…

16. Cussing me out because you feel that I should bend over backwards to benefit you at my expense and I didn’t do so immediately isn’t going to make me inclined to go the extra mile. On some days, I won’t even make it to the end of the call.

17. No, I’m not going to help you sidestep our policies, wink wink nudge nudge, knowwhatImean?

18. You’re the idiot that put the call on the speakerphone, not me.

19. Don’t mumble and lose the streetmeat patois. Offhanded slacker jackassery might be way kewl in other venues, but do you really want the people that’ll be tinkering with your body with toxic substances and sharp objects confused?

20. I’m convinced that hospitals should provide prospective parents with lists of names that they can choose from for their spawn, including instructions on how to spell them. Parents that saddle their spawn with unpronounceable, unspellable, misspelled, faux-ethnic names should be publicly flogged. If your child wants to make some anti-societal statement with his name, let him do it on his own, don’t saddle the poor little beggar with it when he’s too young to know what’s going on. And if it’s you that has issues, jerk your name around, not your kid’s.

21. TRICARE assigns you to a primary care manager. I will try to match you up with your caregiver’s available appointments first, then move on to other available providers in order that you be seen expeditiously. If you hate your caregiver’s guts, call TRICARE and have your PCM changed. As long as a caregiver is listed as your primary, that’s who I’m going to try to book you with first. Them’s the rules.

22. If you just can’t tolerate that you have a male caregiver, call TRICARE and have it changed. You may find yourself having to be seen offbase as there just aren’t that many wymyn providers round these parts. In any event, I don’t care, talk to the hand. I understand that in certain situations having a provider of a particular gender can be uncomfortable for that particular situation and we do try to work with these issues, but the blanket whining about all wymym all the time is quite tiresome, get over it, and yourself.

23. Just because you don’t have to pay for care, doesn’t mean that it’s worthless. A history of no-shows will get you barred from the facility as you’re preventing other folk from being seen by jerking the facility around.

24. This is the appointment desk, just tell me who you are and what you need to be seen for, I can take it from there. Save the history for your visit, I can’t do anything with it and you’re just extending the call.

25. If it’s an emergency, why are you calling me? Can you say 911?

19. May 2005 · Comments Off on Memo: Not the Ladies’ Auxiliary · Categories: General, GWOT, Military

To: The Senate Armed Forces Committee
From: Sgt Mom
Re: Military Women & Combat Support

1. My dear ladies and gentlemen, at this point is a little late to be coaxing the horse of “No Women in Combat!” back into the barn and locking the door. This would require the military to reverse nearly thirty years of placing military women— who are volunteers, mark you— in specialties which do not permit them to go out deliberately looking for combat, but which do put them out where combat might, in theory, come looking for them. This was a great change from the previous system, in which military women were stationed either in the continental United States performing various support functions a long, long way from what was clearly understood to be the front, or as nurses and clerks in a handful of rear-echelon areas where it was devotedly hoped that in case of defeat and capture that the Geneva Convention and the enemies’ chivalric sensibilities would afford some kind of protection.

2. Alas, only one country that we have fought since 1941 has given more than lip service for the Geneva Convention, the forces of militant Islam would appear to have about as much use for traditional chivalry as Orky the Killer Whale has for a stair step machine, and it is abundantly clear that in this war, there is no front line, there is no safe area. When an enemy can take a clear shot at the Pentagon, and kill civil servants sitting quietly at their desk jobs— well, that should make it pretty clear that there is no rear in which to park the gear and the ladies’ auxiliary safely out of harms’ way… even if going back to the old way were still even possible.

3. Many of the necessary combat-support jobs in this war are being done by soldiers, airmen, sailors and Marines who just happen to be of the female persuasion. They have volunteered for the military, they have trained to do their jobs, they have been leaders, supervisors, commanders, and as such they are essential. As professionals, I am sure that most of them had a pretty good idea of what they were getting into… and for those who didn’t the ambush of a certain Army maintenance unit convoy in 2003 served as a wake-up call. This for real, and this is for keeps, and those who do not have a sword may still die upon one.

4. I would agree that seeing the mothers of small children coming back from Iraq in a coffin is a heartbreaking prospect; so are the accounts and pictures of military women who have lost limbs, been horribly scarred, who have been injured and face a long recovery… but how can it be any less horrible for the mothers of sons to face the same? We all hold a stake in this; we are all at war, no matter where we might be, and no matter if it is a son or a daughter, a wife or a husband serving. Please don’t patronize us by deciding that one or the other of them should be protected right out of what they are doing in our service. Do what you can to see that every soldier, sailor, airman and Marine has what they ought to have, now and in the future to do what they need to do.

5. Finally, I derive a great deal of mental satisfaction in imagining a particularly odious Baathist— perhaps one of Saddam Hussein’s official rapists— or an especially misogynist Al-Quaida operative being cuffed by a female SP, or tapped at a good distance by an expertly shooting woman Marine. I would ask rather that you do what you can to see that this happens… soon and often.

Sincerely
Sgt. Mom

18. May 2005 · Comments Off on In Your Dreams @ the Movies! · Categories: General, History, Media Matters Not

The beginning of the summer movie season has already begun, with every other movie doing their level best to avoid being trampled into a microscopically thin layer of celluloid paste under the hooves of the mighty Star Wars behemoth. There seems to be no middle ground in discussions of “Hitchhikers’ Guide”; everyone either loved it or hated it. So far, the cruelest, and most succinct take on Sir Ridley Scotts’ Crusade clunker has been “The Kingdom of Heave”— richly deserved for irredeemable presentism as regards religious attitudes, historical personages, and heroically sucking up to CAIR. Hollywood loves those crazy-brave idealists who speak truth to power and stick it to the man… but best not even think of sticking it cinematically to anyone who might slap a fatwa on their ass or send a car bomb into Morton’s’.

One historically-minded enthusiast lamented that he had always wanted to see a movie about Baldwin, the Leper-King of Jerusalem— it would have every kind of drama imaginable—- but after “Kingdom of Heave” anyone with the power to green-light such an epic would just shrug and say, “Been done.” Oh, the movies we wish we could see, the TV series we would want to have on the air, but with a couple of honorable exceptions— to which we are fanatically devoted— it’s the same old, same old, and not very daring with it, either. Last week at Rantburg, one of the regulars was pointing out that as long as Hollywood was going back and re-doing old movies and series, what about reviving the 1960ies series “Rat Patrol” and updating it to present-day Iraq or Afghanistan? What a concept— four Special Forces soldiers dashing around the desert, fighting insurgents and blowing up stuff! It would work, and work very well, especially with boys of all ages in the red states, and the Army would fall all over themselves giving assistance to the producer. Alas, there is about as much a chance of that happening, as there is of my own dream movie epic, albeit for different reasons.

Because, you see, hardly anyone has ever heard of this particular party of men, women and children. They blazed a trail in the wilderness, walked nearly three thousand miles, across plain and desert, and finally hauled wagons up a sheer mountain cliff. They set out into country unknown to most, and very possibly all, all for a gamble that life at the other end of the trail would be better. They are a footnote in the history books, going under several different names, because no one was ever entirely sure afterwards who their leader was. They had no diarist, no tireless letter-writer or professional memoirist among them, no extensive first-hand contemporary accounts; they were ordinary people … but on an epic journey.

(To be continued)

17. May 2005 · Comments Off on Why I Love The Scotsman · Categories: General

As usual, they give the most objective reporting of any UK daily:

And it was a Democrat senator, Carl Levin, rather than the Republican committee chairman, Norm Coleman, who gave him the hardest time as Mr Galloway sought to turn the tables on his inquisitors, leaving him no closer to clearing his name than when he took his seat in front of the sub-committee of the Senate’s homeland security and government affairs committee in Washington.

Of course, those of us immersed in the blogosphere have known Galloway is corrupt from scalp-to-sole for at least two years. But it’s nice to see him finally getting skinned in the MSM.

17. May 2005 · Comments Off on Site Policy · Categories: General, Site News

Just to make a couple of things absolutely, positively clear, folks:

1. I have only ever banned a commenter from this site once. That person was a particularly charmless and abusive troll, and after I got tired of making fun of it, I went to a great deal of administrative hassle to ban his/her/it’s IP address. It’s a big chore, and frankly I have better things to do.

2. Comments on this site are lightly moderated, mostly because of the incessant drizzle of automated card-game and transsexual p0rn spam posted by some ‘tard who is too cheap to pay for advertising. Comments containing certain words go into the moderation bin until one of us has a chance to review. If your comment doesn’t appear right away, that is where it has gone. It is not personal, and you have not been banned.

3. I don’t care if the discussion gets lively— acrimonious, even. If you dish it out, you should be able to take it and respond in kind. Just keep the flung heavy objects and death threats down to a dull roar, m’kay?

As you were,

Sgt. Mom

17. May 2005 · Comments Off on I HAVE LOST NO RIGHTS AND NEITHER HAVE YOU. IF YOU THINK YOU HAVE, PROVE IT. · Categories: Domestic, General, Good God, GWOT, Home Front, Media Matters Not, Rant

I do not wish to single out any one person in a post, ever. Nor do I wish to be mean-spirited to anyone here or anywhere else. Should you ask anyone who knows me, even anyone who was with us last Saturday at the 43rd reunion of our high school class, I’m sure the answer would be that I’m kind, fair, and that I love people. Also, I believe people would say that I live my life according to the Word of God in every way that I know how, that I love the Lord Jesus and that my love for people stems from that. But here on this one post I have to divert from my normal principles, I have to name someone, and I apologize ahead of time for having to do that, but I have been backed into a corner along with a lot of other folks and I’m coming out of this corner aggressively. Kayse, I’ve bent over backwards being nice to you, but your comment responding to Timmer’s query cannot go unchallenged. Before I give my response, let me state that I too recognize that you are entitled to your opinion no less than anyone else, and those of us who have spent time in the military were and are there for the purpose of defending your right to disagree with anyone you choose.

When you say that you don’t trust your government, it gets personal. Because I, and Timmer, and Sgt Mom, and all others who here on this site were in the military or worked for civil service, ARE that government. Remember, Abe Lincoln stated that our government was of, by, and for, the people. Be that the case, you as well, are part of that government. So, just which right have you lost? You said you had lost your right to privacy. Just who, and how, has your privacy been violated? Who in the Homeland Security Department has harrassed you? How have they punished you? What has anyone in this country, part of our government, done to punish you? If you think people who work for that dark, mysterious entity that you call the government are not accountable for their actions, then you are sadly, grossly, mistaken. Let me give you an example. I work for the Army as a paramedic. In my position I have the vital statistics, including SSAN’s, of my patients, in my hands. You think I’m not accountable for how I handle that information? Then you’re as full of sh** as a Christmas turkey!! If I were so much as to write that stuff down on the wrong piece of paper, much less take any of it home with me, I’d lose my job! And the same goes for anyone else who is employed by the government. I don’t care what department, or career path you mention, we are entrusted with protecting you and your information, in many cases, to the death. It’s insulting as hell to anyone in the military for you to casually make such an assinine statement.

And get this straight. It is not the fault of your government that you cannot “easily” fly from one destination to another. You need to get it straight in that red-haired head of yours, that it was n0t the government that flew four planes full of innocent passengers to their deaths, taking nearly 3,000 other innocent citizens to their deaths. DAMMIT, IT WAS ISLAMOFASCIST TERRORISTS! Your head is just not on straight, because it was the government that you hate that instituted safety measures to protect your hide. If I sound angry, you’re dang right I am. I am angry that you so easily insult those who are bound by honor and by law to protect you, and you whine and snivel because it’s not “easy” for you to fly. What in hell do you propose? That we just open up and let anyone who wants to, get on aircraft, even if they want to crash that plane into a building or a ball game? Dadburn, woman, you sound like you’re nuts! You’d better be thanking God that you have a government that wants to keep the idiot suicide bombers at bay elsewhere instead of downtown your town. You’d better be grateful that you are a citizen and CAN get a driver’s license, or an ID card, if and when it comes to that. BTW, they can’t get that ID system out fast enough for me. I don’t worry, I already have one, it’s called a military ID.

Your comment that government employees are compiling “dossiers” on all of us is another stupid, idiotic idea. That belongs with the Area 51 and other such conspiracy theories. Who killed JFK? Have you seen Elvis lately? AARRRRGGGHHH! No one in the government gives a rat’s behind about who you are, and they certainly don’t have time to compile a dossier on you. They’re too busy protecting your butt from another attack. You need to take a deep breath and sit back, enjoy the sunshine and the freedoms you have. We do not live in a Soviet-style country, you can relax and forget all this stuff.

Your comments about ministers was uncalled for as well. You don’t have to go to any church, listen to any minister, or subscribe to any faith that you don’t want to. So, leave ministers and churches out of it. No one there is bothering you. Your so-called “fundamentalist” preachers were here, preaching the very same message, long before President Bush came along, and they will still be there, preaching the same thing, long after he has passed into history.

To cap all this off, you say you are afraid to voice your concerns, fearing someone may put some hit team on you to erase you??? Come on, if you think that way, you need a psychiatrist! No such thing exists in this country, and we are here to insure that it never does happen. I’ve had enough of this. If you are not comfortable here, maybe you might feel more at home on DU, the Democrat Underground, or on Kos’s site. They seem to voice the same ideas that you appear to be comfortable with. However, if we don’t scare you too bad, you’re welcome to stay here and give us more of your ideas. Who knows, you may find others who agree with you! And I promise you, I’ll do my best, as will the others here, to keep the “hit squads” on other targets and away from you.

17. May 2005 · Comments Off on Your Minister May Also Be An MBA · Categories: General

BusinessWeek reports on contemporary Evangelical churches employing practices straight from the American business community:

With such low barriers to entry, the number of evangelical megachurches — defined as those that attract at least 2,000 weekly worshippers — has shot up to 880 from 50 in 1980, figures John N. Vaughan, founder of research outfit Church Growth Today in Bolivar, Mo. He calculates that a new megachurch emerges in the U.S. an average of every two days. Overall, white evangelicals make up more than a quarter of Americans today, experts estimate. The figures are fuzzy because there’s no common definition of evangelical, which typically refers to Christians who believe the Bible is the literal work of God. They may include many Southern Baptists, nondenominational churches, and some Lutherans and Methodists. There are also nearly 25 million black Protestants who consider themselves evangelicals but largely don’t share the conservative politics of most white ones. Says pollster George Gallup, who has studied religious trends for decades: “The evangelicals are the most vibrant branch of Christianity.”

The triumph of evangelical Christianity is profoundly reshaping many aspects of American politics and society. Historically, much of the U.S. political and business elite has been mainline Protestant. Today, President George W. Bush and more than a dozen members of Congress, including House Speaker Dennis Hastert, are evangelicals. More important, the Republican Right has been fueled by the swelling ranks of evangelicals, whose leaders tend to be conservative politically despite their progressive marketing methods. In the 1960s and ’70s, prominent evangelicals like Billy Graham kept a careful separation of pulpit and politics — even though he served as a spiritual adviser to President Richard M. Nixon. That began to change in the early 1980s, when Jerry Falwell formed the Moral Majority to express evangelicals’ political views. Many of today’s evangelicals hope to expand their clout even further. They’re also gaining by taking their views into Corporate America. Exhibit A: the recent clash at software giant Microsoft.

As they thrive, though, there are growing tensions, with some mainline Protestants offended by their conservative politics and brazen marketing. “Jesus was not a capitalist; check out what [He] says about how hard it is to get into heaven if you’re a rich man,” says the Reverend Robert W. Edgar, general secretary of the liberal National Council of Churches.

Especially controversial are leaders like Osteen and the flamboyant Creflo A. Dollar, pastor of World Changers Church International in College Park, Ga., who preach “the prosperity gospel.” They endorse material wealth and tell followers that God wants them to be prosperous. In his book, Osteen talks about how his wife, Victoria, a striking blonde who dresses fashionably, wanted to buy a fancy house some years ago, before the money rolled in. He thought it wasn’t possible. “But Victoria had more faith,” he wrote. “She convinced me we could live in an elegant home…and several years later, it did come to pass.” Dollar, too, defends materialistic success. Dubbed “Pass-the-Dollar” by critics, he owns two Rolls Royces (RYCEY ) and travels in a Gulfstream 3 jet. “I practice what I preach, and the Bible says…that God takes pleasure in the prosperity of his servants,” says Dollar, 43, nattily attired in French cuffs and a pinstriped suit.

16. May 2005 · Comments Off on Attention! · Categories: General, History, Technology

To: All Fans of Vintage Aircraft
From: Sgt Mom
Re: Air Show This Weekend!!!

1. Being that William, the Significant Other, is intensely involved with this, and has been telling me all about it (and other museum projects!) for some weeks, I feel it only fair to help spread the word: This weekend is the annual “Wings of Fame” air show at Chino’s Cal-Aero Field. They will have 24 flying World War II aircraft, including two Zeros and just about every flyable P-47 Thunderbolt in the world, plus many other cool vintage aircraft on display. The Wings of Fame has the largest collection of flyable vintage aircraft on the west coast.

2. Cal-Aero Field is at 7000 Merrill Avenue in Chino, and their website is here, with schedules, maps, lists and pictures of the exhibits… and directions on getting there.

3. Take special note of Williams’ pride and joy, the B-17 Piccadilly Lily: they are fundraising, in order to make it flyable again.

Sincerely,
Sgt Mom

16. May 2005 · Comments Off on Memo: Dead Media Walking · Categories: General, Media Matters Not, sarcasm

To: Various
From: Sgt Mom
Re: Newsweek/Koran Desecration

1. Newsweek writers Michael Isakoff, and John Barry: Sooooo, an unnamed source who thinks he saw something about it, but can’t really pin it down is good enough for a “professional journalist”* to run with? Say, can I get paid for relaying water-cooler gossip and speculation?

2. The unnamed source: Nice going, a**hole. You flapped your lips to a “reporter”* and more than a dozen people are dead, and even more may be in danger.

3. Newsweek editor Mark Whitaker: Ummm, in this age of cable news 24/7, the internet and satellite communications, the purpose of a general weekly dead-tree digest of news and stuff would be— other than to consume so many thousands of acres of wood-pulp, and to save your phony-baloney job— what, exactly? At worst, your take on the news is a week old by the time it hits the newsstand or mailbox. Fresh fish and fresh news go stale at about the same rate… and I don’t buy either, at a week old.
Checked your circulation figures recently?

4. The so-called “Islamic street”: Do you guys ever get tired of being played for saps? Try some exercises in critical thinking, next time someone tells you some wild story. I realize that the 21st century may be a bit of a leap, intellectually, politically, and technologically, but the 19th century would work for us… for choice, the latter half of it. Realize that your actions make it really difficult for the spokesman for CAIR and other American Islamic groups to go on insisting that “Islam is a religion of peace” with a straight face. Some of them must be very close to OD’ing on Botox, by now

5. The Afghani and Pakistani Mullahs: No, we shall not be turning any personnel over to you for desecrating the Koran. Now, you might get the detainee who ripped up a copy and tried to clog a toilet with it— does that count? In turn, we would like you to turn over to us: The murderers of Nicholas Berg and Daniel Pearl… and those Palestinian cruds who desecrated the Church of the Nativity… plus a number of others to be named at a later date. Thanks for your consideration and attention to this matter

6. DU and the Kos Kiddies: (wow, what a name for an alternative band!) No, the evil US gummint did not force Newsweek to retract their story. Tell you what, I will throw out something for the paranoids to chew on: Just suppose the unnamed source was throwing Isakoff and Barry a totally bogus, BS story, just to mess with their heads, and see if they would be so foolish as to swallow it whole… and look like complete dickheads when it was disproved. How’s that for eeeeevvviiil? Destroy the credibility of mainstream media by feeding them tales which are easily disproved a week later! (Bwahhhh-hahhh-hahhh!) Don’t bother to thank me, kiddies, I live to serve. You want a couple of rolls of paper towels to clean up the mess from all the exploding heads?

7. *As always, those are not “scare” quote marks— they are “viciously skeptical” quote marks.

Sincerely,
Sgt. Mom

14. May 2005 · Comments Off on Obviously Above the Law · Categories: General

I get so tired of reading stories of legislators and other high-ranking officials mishandling confidential or classified information. The latest comes from Senate Majority Minority Leader Harry Reid (see Michelle Malkin: DIRTY HARRY REID: BLABBERMOUTH). Michelle quotes from the Washington Times:

Minority Leader Harry Reid strayed from his prepared remarks on the Senate floor yesterday and promised to continue opposing one of President Bush’s judicial nominees based on “a problem” he said is in the nominee’s “confidential report from the FBI.”

It should be noted that Reid doesn’t even have access to the subject FBI report — only members of the Judiciary Committee.

This follows on the heels of the light sentence recently given to Sandy Berger for taking classified documents from the National Archives. I’m also reminded of the release of Linda Tripp’s security clearance form during the Clinton-Lewinski scandal, a clear violation of the Privacy Act.

If any of us had done things like while on active duty, we’d be looking at our options for civilian life or (at least in the case of what Berger did) the four walls of a cell at Ft. Leavenworth.

I was incredibly A-R about protected information. Heck, I’d even avoid discussing blatantly non-sensitive information on the periphery, just to be safe. To watch people like Reid treat sensitive information in such a cavalier way is infuriating.

This doesn’t even touch on the fact that what he’s done is just plain despicable: attack a judge based on information that the public (and even the judge) doesn’t have access to. Fortunately, the Department of Justice is now looking into it (see Captain Ed: Reid’s Smear Raises Eyebrows At DoJ). I hope he’s forced to step down, though past experience indicates nothing will come of it.

UPDATE: Umm… as Kevin reminds us, Reid is the Minority Leader, not the Majority Leader (thank goodness!).

UPDATE2: I can’t seem to comment on my own post. I’ve written two clever retorts to comments only to have them eaten. Perhaps they’re caught in the ether and will show up later. If not, I’ll make an additional post.

UPDATE3: I figured out how to get my comments posted. Maybe I shouldn’t have called them “clever retorts.” :–)

14. May 2005 · Comments Off on A Hybrid In Your Future? Probably Not · Categories: General

I’ve just been watching an interview with that idiot, Robert F. Kennedy jr. on Cavuto. He was pushing the idea that we must give up our SUVs in favor of hybrids (ignoring the fact that the Lexus RX400h is an SUV as well as a hybrid).

Among the nonsense this Buffoon was spouting included the proposition that drilling in ANWR would have only a .02% increase in the nation’s oil reserves, and then only after 10 years, while an increase of 1 mpg in CAFE standards would be the equivalent of IMMEDIATELY doubling currently exploited Alaskan oil. As for the former, (whether or not the figure is correct, which I haven’t checked) it is a disingenuous mixing of terms. The fact that ANWR would have only a small effect on the nation’s oil supply is that, in today’s marketplace, that supply is indifferentiable from the world’s oil supply. The energy/enviro nazis play this down. but that fact gives lie to the whole concept of “energy independence.” In order to achieve such a goal, we would need a nationalized petroleum industry, with the capability to supply greater than 100% of the nation’s requirements. As for the later, it should be obvious that any effect from a change in CAFE standards would not be seen until a significant portion of the national fleet is replaced by newer models; it wouldn’t be felt for years.

Specifically on the matter of hybrids, RFK jr., parrots the conventional assumption that they will become a major portion of the fleet within a few years. But a more thorough analysis places that assumption in great doubt. First, despite a substantial price premium (about $5000) over equivalent conventional vehicles, industry insiders widely agree that the market leaders, Toyota and Honda, are at best realizing a near-zero marginal profit on every hybrid vehicle they produce. However, this price premium doesn’t pay for itself in increased fuel economy, especially since most owners report far lower fuel economy than EPA estimates

Second, long term maintenance costs are sure to be higher than equivalent conventional vehicles. Besides the limited lifetime of the battery packs, the massive increase in the complexity of these vehicles just means there’s more to go wrong. Long term owners are sure to find that, just when they’ve saved enough on fuel to recover their initial investment, they start getting hit with 4-figure repair bills.

The first two points have not been lost on the general consumer. Which brings us to the third: rather than a massive portion of the overall market, J.D. Power and Assoc. predicts that hybrid sales will top-out at only about 3%. At that rate, it is doubtful that Toyota and Honda, to say nothing of later entrants into the marketplace, will never achieve profitability with hybrids. And, free of government subsidies or mandates, it’s unlikely production will continue.

13. May 2005 · Comments Off on Thunder and Rain · Categories: Domestic, General

A thunderstorm blew over my house on Sunday, around mid-day. This happens every two or three weeks, at least once a month during a normal spring and summer. Our thunderstorms in South Texas are as outsized as everything else is supposed to be in the west. Sometimes they appear as great creamy mounds of cloud, piling up and up and up in the clear blue sky, the bottom layer as flat and grey as a an iron, pressing down on the land. Out in the high desert, you can see them coming, a long way away, with a grey veil of rain hanging below, and even if the storm is moving away, sometimes you can catch the scent of it on the desert air, a teasing whisper of moisture.

Around here, a thunderstorm sweeping in from the mountains, or up from the Gulf will cover the entire sky; sometimes there is a odd, sepia or greenish cast to the air, until the last of the sunlight winks out. The clouds darken to leaden grey, and press closer, as if twilight is falling in the middle of the day. Lights that are activated by a sensor—streetlights and advertising signs and such— wink on. Sometimes the storm is announced by gusts of wind, but more usually by a distant grumble of thunder.
Storms that come in at night introduce themselves with lightening; one spectacular storm a couple of summers ago lit up the sky constantly for nearly half an hour; nonstop flickering light, etching the trees and the big stone cross at St. Helena’s on the other side of the green belt at the back of my yard in harsh, blue white light. Impossible to count the seconds between the flash and the noise, while gusts of wind lash the tree branches.

The rain announces itself as a faint rustle in the grass and in the tree leaves, pattering in random wet splotches on the stone path. The first few fat drops resound like small pebbles on the fiberglass porch roof, and then the full force sweeps in, and the light pattering becomes a full-throated roar. The porch roof is fringed with silvery streamlets of water, and St. Helena’s and the great stone cross in the field beyond my garden are dim shapes in the veil of rain. The rainwater is cold, or maybe it only seems so, but it feels like the storm has brought a breath of coolness with it. Sometimes the rain brings hail, almost always icy little pellets the size of bee-bees bouncing off hard surfaces. Very occasionally, the hail is larger— marble and golf-ball and baseball sized, and accordingly more dangerous. My neighbor Judy was trying to get some of her potted plants under cover during the hail storm two months ago, and collected a number of bruises on her shoulders and back before she thought better of that plan.

The rain sheets off my neighbor’s roof, overflowing the gutter and splashing into the flowerbed that I have mulched with gravel. My own downspouts are spilling water into the area between our houses, the garden path is awash with it. The street in front of my house runs nearly ankle deep in water after a downpour like this; somehow the this city has never quite got the hang of constructing roads with adequate coving; roads and drains mean pretty much the same thing. To our enormous civic embarrassment it is entirely possible to be swept away and drown within city limits, as the result of driving down certain streets in a heavy rain.

Ten, fifteen, twenty minutes, the downpour is relentless, but then it seems like it is not so dark, the twilight is lifting, and the roar on the patio roof dies away. A few birds chirp uncertainly from where they have taken shelter. A crack of blue sky widens between two clouds, a fan of sunbeams spreads open like the halo of a saint in an El Greco painting, and the storm is gone as swiftly as it arrived. And with luck, there’ll be another one in a couple of weeks, so I’ll not need to water my garden with the hose, and the little white wildflowers that people call rain-lilies will miraculously sprout in a day or so, nickel-sized white hexagons on a green stem, swaying among the uncut grass in the fields and roadsides.

12. May 2005 · Comments Off on Now, That’s Inspired!!! · Categories: General, That's Entertainment!, The Funny

….and very, very warped. This for Timmer and all you other Star Wars Fans. Don’t have your mouth full, when you click on the link.

It’s true, simply everyone who is anyone has a blog, these days.

(Courtesy of Rantburg and Vodkapundit)

12. May 2005 · Comments Off on MilBlog Roundup · Categories: General

By who else?

Blackfive.

Capt Loggie and the Corporal may have some issues with where we’re listed, but this is much better than being on Huggingtonsofun’s Blogroll.

Lot’s of reading to do I have.

12. May 2005 · Comments Off on Random Economic Thought · Categories: Domestic, General

There are three ways of dealing with the challenge of having champagne tastes and a beer budget; aesthetic, artisanal and economic. One can either

Learn to like beer

Learn to make champagne

Drink mineral water on six nights of the week, and champagne on the seventh.

10. May 2005 · Comments Off on Once Upon a Star Wars Movie · Categories: General, Memoir, That's Entertainment!

I am not at all sure I will go the new Star Wars movie; I gave a miss to the last one with no particular regret, since the one before that was such a drear, mechanical and glum experience, bloated with set-piece special effects, and only one remotely amusing moment. (When stranded on wherever it was with all the sand, one of the Jedi made a reference to the Queens’ terribly ornate and extensive wardrobe. Swear to god, people, that was the only time I came close to cracking a smile.) The build-up to it was so terrific, it seemed like every magazine except for a handful of foreign affairs, or animal husbandry publications were pounding away relentlessly with triple sledgehammers: “It’s Star Wars – The Beginning!” (Blam!) “See the beginning of the Empire!” (BLAM!) “Light-sabers! Jedi Knights! Special Effects Up The Whazoo!” (KAH-BLAMMO!!!) I was tired of it, even before seeing the picture – which I did eventually, after willfully and maliciously holding out for about three weekends. I stumbled away from the multiplex with a headache, and a numb behind, although it may have been the other way around. How very far George Lucas had come, how very different that move-going experience was from the very first Star Wars – as if it had really been a long time ago, and in another galaxy.
I was home from technical school at Ft. Benjamin Harrison, when the first Star Wars movie opened in the Los Angeles area. I was fresh from a week with the boyfriend whom I adored, with orders for my first duty station in hand. Japan! What adventure awaited! (Of course, the week with Ted had been pretty adventurous as well.) I had been in the Air Force for six months, and would be away for at least a year, maybe more. My absence had not been long enough for the family to close up ranks and fill in the space where I had been – it was pretty much like it was when I came back from a summer away, and one afternoon JP suggested that we go and see that cool new space movie. There had been a huge, quarter-page ad in the movie section of the LA Times, and an indulgently rapturous review.
“It sounds pretty cool,” said JP, “And different, anyway.”
The only theater it was showing it locally was the Cinerama Dome, down on Sunset Boulevard, which we thought was pretty cool. It had only been a few years since Mom had given up driving over to West Hollywood to the church we had attended for years, below Sunset on Doheny. We knew the way— down into the Valley, over the hills and along Laurel Canyon to Sunset Boulevard, where the Garden of Alla had been, and the Wisky-a-Go-Go and the revolving Myra Breckenridge figure, and the Chateau Marmont— so driving over that well-known route was pretty much a snap. We figured that we would catch an early evening show, and be home a little after midnight, a plan that pretty much dissolved when we actually got there, and discovered that the first evening show was sold out. And so was the mid-evening show – and the line at the box office was for tickets to the late evening show, an excited and enthusiastic crowd, mostly of people our age.
“It’s my only chance to see this,” I said, “Let’s find a phone, and let Mom and Dad know.”

The line for tickets went down Sunset Boulevard to the corner, around the corner, and up to the next corner, eventually meeting up with the line to get into the theater, which started at the door, went down Sunset in the opposite direction, to that corner, etc cetera. After consulting with a couple of mad Star Trek fans in line with us, JP and I made the rational decision that I should stay in line for tickets, and he would go wait in the line to get in. The Star Trek fans made a similar decision. Our lines crawled in opposite directions, all that evening. Did we eat dinner? I don’t think so, we were too excited to be hungry. Triumphantly, the ticket line advanced, around the corner, up to the box office; with a pair of tickets for the last showing of the night in hand, I set off down the sidewalk to where JP waited, still half a block from the door. By the time we get into the theater, we were as excited as we used to be, going to one of the grand old Art Deco picture palaces in Pasadena with Granny Jessie.
Inside the very modern Cinerama Dome, the atmosphere was electric with excitement and anticipation. The lights went dim, and the music came up, and the great letters of the opening titles swam through dark space. We were sucked in, from the very first opening scene, with the fleeing transport shooting back at the Imperial battle cruiser, which grew bigger, bigger, unimaginably huge, the sound of it rattling your heart in your chest. Ahh, that was an exhilarating, dazzling roller-coaster ride of a movie, with all the classical elements, dashes of wit and adventure, of battered technology and strange creatures, bursting with visual creativity, Robin Hood and Buck Rogers and all. JP and I stumbled out of the theater two hours later, feeling like it had only been twenty minutes or so.
“Wow. Just wow.” JP said earnestly. Just wow, indeed. I was off to Japan, in a week or so… where everyone wondered what it was all about, until the movie showed up on the AAFES circuit, six months later. I saw the second part, on a bootleg Beta tape at my daughters’ baby-sitters’ house in mid 1980, and the third part at the AAFES theater at Hellenikon AFB in 1984. It was terrific, each of those times… but nothing ever quite equaled that first time. Don’t tell me why, I already know.

09. May 2005 · Comments Off on Unified Theory of Career Nervousness · Categories: General, Military

My theory, such as it is, is based on the observation that there were certain people in the military who are just ulcer-inducingly, tear-out-your-hair, develop-a-drinking-problem impossible to work for, and that they were concentrated in certain ranks and had accrued a very specific quantity of time in service.

Of course it was pretty likely that some of these people had been pretty much a waste of flesh and stripes/commission from their first day on active duty, but I began to notice, as I accrued TAFMS years myself, that the majority of them were concentrated in the enlisted rank of E-6 (TSgt.) or the officer rank of Major. Given that complete and total dickheads ought to be pretty evenly distributed throughout the ranks, I tried to account for the disproportionate accumulation of them at the rank of Technical Sergeant or Major with eighteen to nineteen years of service. I believe that Sgt. Mom’s Unified Theory of Career Nervousness accounts for this phenomenon.

My theory is predicated upon the fact that a career military member can retire with a somewhat adequate pension at twenty years, but that most enlisted members want very much to retire as an E-7, and that officers want very much to retire as a Colonel. At those ranks, you can stay on past the twenty year mark, but if you have not… oh well. As they say in Moscow, “Tuff shitski, comrade.”. An E-6, or a major with just a year to two to go before that twenty-year cut off, and facing the prospect that making it to the next rank is problematical to impossible… well, that person is very often either sour and embittered or afraid that the least little mark against will screw up the chance they do have of making it to that next magical promotion. The sour and embittered, or the terribly ambitious are not nice people to work for. Three guesses as to whom they will take it out on, and the first two guesses do not count.

Of course, this is not true of all Tech-Sergeants and Majors with that duration of service… and does not address the truly towering horribleness of Colonels who thirst with a desperate longing to pin on that star… but on the whole, I think it works. Discuss, with examples and competing theories, please.