13. January 2006 · Comments Off on From The Sublime To The Ridiculous · Categories: Military, That's Entertainment!

I’m currently watching something on the Military Channel called “Top Ten Fighting Ships.” No. Ten was the British Hood Class, and No. Nine is the German Deutschland class “pocket battleship.”

Well, this is but a continuation of a series, but it has gotten absurd. The most formidable “Fighting Ship” in history, by leaps and bounds, is the Ohio-class submarine. A distant, but strong, second is the Nimitz-class aircraft carrier.

Well, they agreed with me on #2. But #1 is the Iowa-Class battleship – Eeek!

What do we say here? With the possible exception of the Richelieu, the Iowas were the greatest Dreadnoughts ever produced. But they were, from their very inception, “magnificent anachronisms.”

Do we need to talk about the ignominious swan song, as the world’s most expensive missile cruiser, in Desert Storm?

Ok, they never really distinguished themselves in battle.

But, when an Ohio “distinguishes Itself,” we all might best dive from the fourteenth floor.

Here’s the whole list. The show’s “experts” obviously like battleships. Even given that, based on the selection criteria: protection, fire power, fear factor, innovation and service length, the choices are puzzling:

10. Hood class battlecruiser
9. Deutschland class pocket battleship
8. Essex class aircraft carrier
7. Bismarck class battleship
6. North Carolina class battleship
5. Fletcher class destroyer
4. Ticonderoga class guided missile Aegis cruiser
3. Queen Elizabeth class battleship
2. Nimitz class nuclear aircraft carrier
1. Iowa class battleship

Note not one submarine. You would think they might at least include the WWII Balao class.

The modern fighting ship, as far as ship-on-ship warfare goes, is the submarine. Taking the lessons of WWII, the US Navy has been built around carriers, missile crusiers, and submarines.

This all goes to my central thesis: is that we are in an absolutely unprecedented epoch in history, wherein the United States has absolute hegemony over all the world’s oceans. The carrier guys like to brag about “five acres of sovereign US territory.” But that hardly states it: Anywhere a US carrier Battle Group goes is, effectively, a 200 mile perimeter of “sovereign US territory.”

13. January 2006 · Comments Off on Some days are wonderful · Categories: Air Force, Military, Wild Blue Yonder

I got the shock of my life this morning. An email from an old friend who was stationed with me at CCK AB in Taiwan. I have no idea how he found me, but it was a joy, and a pleasure to catch him up on the last 25 years. We worked together in the base MARS station. If you ever were overseas and talked by phone patch to home, you know what I mean. I was able to talk to my wife about every week due to my position. It made the tour much shorter! Some days are just jewels!

08. January 2006 · Comments Off on Operation Jaywick · Categories: General, History, Military, War, World

I had never, ever heard of this particularly daring and creative WWII operation, until I taped a TV mini-series about it all, off Star-Plus when I was in Korea… umm, about a decade ago. Chalk it up to cultural bias and isolationism, since I had always read more about the European side of it, and the bits that American forces were involved in, in the Pacific…still, I do regret that I had never heard much about this operation. Major/Colonel Lyon does come off as one of those who is indisputably mad, perhaps a little bit bad, and definitly dangerous— if not to know, then to follow him into the jaws of death or Singapore harbor under Japanese occupation in 1943-45.
(The miniseries is not, apparently, available via Amazon, although the book that it is based upon is.)

02. January 2006 · Comments Off on Poll Shows Drop In Military Support For Bush · Categories: General, Media Matters Not, Military, Politics

This from NPR’s All Things Considered:

A new poll by the Army Times Publishing Company, to be released Monday, shows a drop in support for President Bush and his conduct of the war in Iraq. The poll was sent to thousands of active duty military subscribers of the publisher’s newsweeklies, including the Army Times.

They link to a podcast of the interview with Army Times’ senior managing editor Robert Hodierne. But I’m going to wait for the print story, which doesn’t seem to have been released yet. I want to see the particular questions asked, and the responses. Because, as we all know, support for mister Bush among the military, or any other group, hinges on far more things than the administration’s handling of the GWOT.

18. December 2005 · Comments Off on 12-Step Program for Recovering Military · Categories: General, Military, The Funny, Veteran's Affairs

(The following was sent to me last month by frequent reader Roy M. Read it, wince and snicker.)

1. I am in the military , I have a problem. This is the first step to
recovery…

2. Speech:

* Time should never begin with a zero or end in a hundred, it is not 0530 or 1400 it is 5:30 in the morning (AKA God-awful early).
* Words like deck, rack, and “PT” will get you weird looks; floor, bed,
workout, get used to it.
* “F *ck” cannot be used to -replace whatever word you can’t think of right
now, try “um”.
* Grunting is not talking.
* It’s a phone, not a radio, conversations on a phone do not end in “out”
* People will not know what you are talking about if you tell them you are
coming from Camp Lejeune with the MWSS platoon or that you spent a deployment in the OCAC

More »

18. December 2005 · Comments Off on Command Comes Out Against Blogs · Categories: Military, Technology

I think this is limited to Porphyrogenitus’ 4th Div., but it’s still disturbing:

When we were prepping for deployment, all the leadership were given various briefings on security matters. One was on blogs, and the danger they pose. Now, I get security issues – obviously you don’t want people posting sensitive information, that might affect a mission. But our leadership at least came back from the briefing with the sense that virtually nothing should be said in a Blog – “let people read about it in the news. If you want to talk about stuff, tell your family you’re fine and all but don’t talk about anything, they can watch the news or read it in the papers.”

I hope any of our currently active duty readers comment on what command’s attitude towards blogging is in their units. I believe that whomever came up with this ignorant dictate, in an effort to err on the side of caution, is shooting themselves in the foot.

Hat Tip: InstaPundit

07. December 2005 · Comments Off on A Date Which Will Live in Infamy… · Categories: Domestic, General, History, Home Front, Military, War

In the summer of 1971, when the Girl Scout troop that I belonged to was doing a lovely and frivolous three-week excursion to the Hawaiian Islands, I talked to a man who said he was a Navy vet, and had been at Pearl Harbor on December 7th, 1941. He was, he said, on Ford Island, on a bicycle and on his way to the mess hall for breakfast, when several sorts of heck broke out. And suddenly, everything changed… and nothing was ever quite the same again.
Pearl Harbor, December 7th , 1941….

Arizona Turret

(Turret of the Arizona, taken from the memorial, 1971)

My daughter says she has a new understanding of that… she was on her way to work, the morning of September 11, 2001, at Camp Pendleton, that the whole thing began to develop as she was waking up, in the shower, driving into work… and when she got there, the Marines at her unit were all in the parking lot, listening to their car radios. And that for two or three days, the base was weirdly, curiously quiet.

History… it’s the thing that is happening, when we are on our way to breakfast and have other plans.

05. December 2005 · Comments Off on Mullen’s Build Up Plans · Categories: Military, Politics

This from David S. Cloud at the NYTimes:

WASHINGTON, Dec. 3 – The Navy wants to increase its fleet to 313 ships by 2020, reversing years of decline in naval shipbuilding and adding dozens of warships designed to defeat emerging adversaries, senior Defense Department officials say.

The plan by Adm. Michael G. Mullen, who took over as chief of naval operations last summer, envisions a major shipbuilding program that would increase the 281-ship fleet by 32 vessels and cost more than $13 billion a year, $3 billion more than the current shipbuilding budget, the officials said Friday.

[…]

The Navy is planning to squeeze money from personnel and other accounts, and ask shipyards to hold down costs, even if it means removing certain capabilities.

[…]

Now Admiral Mullen is seeking a fleet that will give the Navy a greater role in counterterrorism and humanitarian operations.

The plan calls for building 55 small, fast vessels called littoral combat ships, which are being designed to allow the Navy to operate in shallow coastal areas where mines and terrorist bombings are a growing threat. Costing less than $300 million, the littoral combat ship is relatively inexpensive.

Navy officials say they have scaled back their goals for a new destroyer, the DD(X), whose primary purpose would be to support major combat operations ashore. The Navy once wanted 23 to 30 DD(X) vessels, but Admiral Mullen has decided on only 7, the Navy official said. The reduction is due in part to the ship’s spiraling cost, now estimated at $2 billion to $3 billion per ship.

The plan also calls for building 19 CG(X) vessels, a new cruiser designed for missile defense, but the first ship is not due to be completed until 2017, the Navy official said.

The proposal would also reduce the fleet’s more than 50 attack submarines to 48, the official said. Some Navy officials have called for keeping at least 55 of them.

The choices have led some analysts to suggest that the Navy is de-emphasizing the threat from China, at least in the early stages of the shipbuilding plan. Beijing’s investment in submarines, cruise missiles and other weapon systems is not expected to pose a major threat to American warships for at least a decade. That gives the Navy time, some analysts argue, to build capabilities that require less firepower and more mobility, a priority for Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld.

The plan also calls for building 31 amphibious assault ships, which can be used to ferry marines ashore or support humanitarian operations.

“This is not a fleet that is being oriented to the Chinese threat,” said Loren Thompson, an analyst at the Lexington Institute, a policy research center in Arlington, Va. “It’s being oriented around irregular warfare, stability operations and dealing with rogue states.”

I bet Murtha won’t like this.

30. November 2005 · Comments Off on Army Wants Synthetic Gills · Categories: Military, Technology

Why this is an Army, and not Navy, project escapes me. But no matter, here’s an interesting tidbit I found over at Military.com:

The Army recently handed Case Western Reserve University and Waltham, MA’s Infoscitex Corp. a joint contract to start investigating a “Microfabricated Biomimetic Artificial Gill System… based on the subdividing regions of clef, filament, and lamellae found in natural fish gills.” In the first phase of the program, “gas exchange units will be designed and demonstrated for rapid, efficient extract of oxygen from surrounding water.”

Further, it seems the Israelis already have something

30. November 2005 · Comments Off on Necessary Clarification · Categories: GWOT, Iraq, Military, Politics

The White House has issued this paper on our strategy in Iraq, which the President’s speech today tracked. Glenn Reynolds reminds us of Steven Den Beste’s seminal post from two years ago, and links to TigerHawk, who has been keeping the flame alive.

What I’m not seeing, however, is some tie-in between achievement of objectives and redeployment of troops.

30. November 2005 · Comments Off on More On Military Guinea Pigs · Categories: Military, Science!, Veteran's Affairs

We recieved this extended comment yesterday to my post: “House Members Want Info On Military’s Human Guinea Pigs.” As it has fallen off the front page, I thought I’d repost it here.

SHADY SHAD SHELLGAME?

The U.S. Army’s Project 112 and its Navy component, Project SHAD, started in 1961 when Robert McNamara and JFK allotted $4 billion and ten years to create a Bio-Chemical juggernaut. Decades of unanswered questions had just begun.

In Judith Miller’s 1999 book, “Germs”, William Capers Patrick III, the head of Bio-Chemical Weapons development programs at Fort Detrick, Maryland for more than 30 years, states, “We didn’t sit around talking about the moral implications of what we were doing. We were problem-solving… you never connected it to people.” Nonetheless, Dr. J. Clifton Spendlove did indeed connect it to people via the Army’s Deseret Test Center, Utah command post. Deposed for a class action suit brought by the VVA on behalf of some Project SHAD participants, Spendlove revealed sailors were purposely used as “human samplers”, citing several documents and films laying out the scope and methods of the tests. Mind you, these “human samplers” were never trained or warned nor given any “informed consent” opportunity to opt out. The callous disregard continues to this day as the Pentagon, VA, Institute of Medicine and others ignore all attempts at Congressional oversight intended to reveal the true impact of the events.

At least five Flathead Valley, Montana Sailors served in the Granville Hall. One died by age 36 from “cancer of unknown origin”. Some were there from 1963-70 as they transported Smithsonian Institution scientists to numerous locations during their “Pacific Ocean Biological Survey Program”, the purpose of which was to determine whether migratory birds could be used as effective “avian vectors” to deliver Biological Weapons. They could. Prior to Project SHAD, the Granville Hall and its sister ship, the USS George Eastman, collected radioactive fallout during a decade-long period encompassing dozens of aboveground nuclear tests in the Marshall Islands. Another Flathead Veteran sailed on the Granville Hall shortly after Project SHAD and has been awarded a VA 100% service-connected disability. He never knew of either preceding project until he saw my guest opinion in the Daily Inter Lake.

No one has produced any documentation indicating that these two ships had ever had their interiors effectively decontaminated. The Granville Hall was the main lab ship for the programs, vulnerable to many pathogenic contaminants. The George Eastman had deadly VX Gas pumped directly into its ventilation system. The disturbing truth is that although SHAD Veteran Frank Tetro has located over 350 “Granny Boys” since 1985, fewer than 10 have surfaced from the George Eastman.

Contrary to the title “Shipboard Hazard and Decontamination”, which insinuates the concept of defending U.S. Servicemen, there’s not one page of the 28,444 listed in the official disclosure of information on Project 112 mandated by Public Law 107-314 containing any data on protective gear created by these programs. Please see here. The entire program from start to finish was designed to find ways to create and distribute deadly Bio-Chemical Weapons. The more than 10,000 Human Test Rats used and abused along the way are consequently no more than an aging inconvenience.

The Billings Gazette quoted Jack Alderson as saying, “Most of them are very proud of what they did, they’d just like to have it acknowledged.” However, of the more than 150 Project 112 and Project SHAD participants who have contacted me since the programs began being declassified in early 2000, none are seeking a red badge of courage. The want answers. Early on, one unforgettable caller told me, “Last week I received notification that I was involved in Project SHAD. Two weeks ago I was diagnosed with liver, spleen, and pancreatic cancer. Can you help me?” He’d been deserted by his country and died in shameful ignominy.

Please help us find the survivors. It’s crucial to support Representative Rehberg, currently the only Republican co-sponsor out of 16 for House Resolution 4259 [The Veterans Right to Know Act]. If you know anyone who might have been involved, direct them to http//www1.va.gov/SHAD where there is contact information and lists of ships, land locations, and dates utilized. They can also receive information and assistance by calling the VA at (800) 749-8387 and/or the DoD at (800) 497-6261.

Thank you,

J.B. Stone
900 Wisconsin Avenue #16
Whitefish, MT 59937

406-862-7514, 862-8739 – message

PS: J.B. served during Project SHAD on the Granville Hall in 1969. He was honorably discharged from the Navy less than 10 months afterward for unnamed “physical disabilities”. His infant daughter died from secondary SHAD exposures in 1980. He’s still waiting for approval of his VA Disability Claim.

Update: Here’s a recent Billings Gazette story:

Night after night, the jets growled overhead and sprayed clouds of dangerous germs and chemicals over the five U.S. tugboats drifting silently in the dark.

Each time, John Olsen hunkered inside tugboat No. 2085 and waited for the mist to settle.

He and the others then gathered air samples inside the boat and handed them over to the scientists who seemed out of place on a pitching tugboat more than 800 miles southwest of Hawaii.

In the morning, the sailors scrubbed the ship with powerful cleaning agents in preparation for the next airplane visit.

The tests, dubbed Shady Grove, were conducted between January and April of 1965 as part of a larger, top secret government program to try out chemical and biological weapons.

Olsen is sure that some of the germs leaked into the tugboats and is fairly convinced there’s a connection between Shady Grove and his health problems years later.

But back then, they assumed they were safe.

“We were just doing what we were supposed to do,” said Olsen, 65, who lives in Billings. “I trusted them.”

Now, 40 years later, those who took part in the tests are pressing the federal government to account for the harm the tests may have caused.

Read the whole thing.

28. November 2005 · Comments Off on Pentagon Way Ahead Of Congressional Dems On Drawdowns · Categories: GWOT, Iraq, Military, Politics

I don’t generally get around to WestHawk; this is from three weeks ago:

Yesterday the U.S. Department of Defense announced its troop rotation plan for Iraq for mid 2006. Only six Army brigades have been given warning orders for deployment to Iraq in mid 2006 (and only one of these six brigades is from the National Guard). In addition to these Army units, the Marine Corps will continue to support two regimental combat teams (equivalent to a brigade) in Iraq.

This winter and spring there will be 15-17 U.S. brigades in Iraq, including the 4-brigade strong 101st Airborne and 4th Infantry Divisions, 2 brigade-equivalents from the Marine Corps, and a variety of independent brigades (Stryker, armored cavalry regiment, etc.).

Thus, yesterday’s Defense Department announcement is a planned halving in U.S. maneuver units in Iraq between winter and summer.

Read the whole thing.

Hat Tip: Donald Sensing, who cites this as further proof that the Jackasses’ demands for Iraq drawdowns are nothing more than politics.

28. November 2005 · Comments Off on Winning The Media Battle · Categories: GWOT, Iraq, Military

This from Mark Sappenfield at CSM:

BROOK PARK, OHIO – Cpl. Stan Mayer has seen the worst of war. In the leaves of his photo album, there are casual memorials to the cost of the Iraq conflict – candid portraits of friends who never came home and graphic pictures of how insurgent bombs have shredded steel and bone.

Yet the Iraq of Corporal Mayer’s memory is not solely a place of death and loss. It is also a place of hope. It is the hope of the town of Hit, which he saw transform from an insurgent stronghold to a place where kids played on Marine trucks. It is the hope of villagers who whispered where roadside bombs were hidden. But most of all, it is the hope he saw in a young Iraqi girl who loved pens and Oreo cookies.

Like many soldiers and marines returning from Iraq, Mayer looks at the bleak portrayal of the war at home with perplexity – if not annoyance. It is a perception gap that has put the military and media at odds, as troops complain that the media care only about death tolls, while the media counter that their job is to look at the broader picture, not through the soda straw of troops’ individual experiences.

Yet as perceptions about Iraq have neared a tipping point in Congress, some soldiers and marines worry that their own stories are being lost in the cacophony of terror and fear. They acknowledge that their experience is just that – one person’s experience in one corner of a war-torn country. Yet amid the terrible scenes of reckless hate and lives lost, many members of one of the hardest-hit units insist that they saw at least the spark of progress.

Of course, The Christian Science Monitor isn’t The New York Times. But it’s a start.

I’m confident that it won’t take much to overcome the liberal “quagmire” meme, as it is, and always has been, written on tissue paper. Further, the American people have never shied away from sacrificing blood and treasure in the name of liberty – so long as they can be assured that progress is being made. Indeed, had those 2,100 lives been lost on the initial push to Baghdad, we still would have reveled at how “easily” we had accomplished the initial mission. It’s been the daily trickle of death – with no reported signs of progress – which has demoralized the general public.

Hat Tip: InstaPundit

23. November 2005 · Comments Off on Slowly, A Middle Ground Being Forged · Categories: Iraq, Military, Politics

Yesterday, Sen. Barack Obama (D-Ill.) came out with some language on withdrawal more reasonable than what we’ve heard from most of the Jackasses, prior to the vote on the “Murtha Resolution”:

“During the course of the next year, we need to focus our attention on how to reduce the U.S. military footprint in Iraq,” Obama said in a luncheon speech to the Chicago Council on Foreign Relations, a forum he had requested. “Notice that I say `reduce,’ and not `fully withdraw.'”

This is a good thing. Unfortunately, he followed it up with more language indicating that he really doesn’t have a clue:

“The administration has narrowed an entire debate about war into two camps: `cut-and-run’ or `stay the course,'” Obama said. “If you offer any criticism or even mention that we should take a second look at our strategy and change our approach, you are branded `cut-and-run.’ If you are ready to blindly trust the administration no matter what they do, you are willing to stay the course.”

If he had been listening to prominent members of the administration and the military, including Condi Rice, Donald Rumsfeld and Lt. Gen. John Vines, he’d know that they see our presence in Iraq beginning to come down within a three to six-month timeframe. Ah – some common ground!

The American people do deserve, and are increasingly insisting upon, some sort of forward visibility – a plan, if you will. But establishing time as a primary factor in that plan is foolhardy. It takes a very long time to create a fully functioning contemporary military – much longer than simply training and equipping ground combat units. It is likely that, barring a “cut-and-run” bill passing in Congress, we will have trainer/advisors, medical corps, air support units and the like, in Iraq for several more years. But the word is that Iraq has more than thirty battalions of ground troops which can function with only minor embedded coalition assistance.

What is needed is an objective oriented plan, which says, item-by-item, “once the Iraqi forces have such-and-such a level of capability, at such-and-such a function, then so many of these sorts of our units can come home” – with projections of when each objective is expected to be obtained. And, the funny thing is, I’m sure all this information exists within the administative/military hierarchy. However, knowing the way the military government works, it is likely voluminous, labyrinthine, and fragmented. Were the Administration to put together a team to accumulate all this management groundwork, then simplify and condense it down to a few pages, so the average citizen can grasp it. And then distribute it – along with the caveat that, like any good business plan, it is flexible, as conditions on the ground change, this whole controversy can be quelled.

23. November 2005 · Comments Off on Uncle Sam And The Soldier Of Fortune Market · Categories: Military

This from U.S News And World Report:

Still a Bargain at $150,000 Each

Sick and tired of losing experienced special forces to private security firms waving bricks of dollars at soldiers returning from Iraq and Afghanistan, the Pentagon recently offered $150,000 re-enlistment bonuses to SEAL s and Green Berets with 19 years or more of service. It worked. Gen. Doug Brown, head of the U.S. Special Operations Command, reveals that 601 people took the tax-free bonus that expired last month. Don’t choke on the price: Training one soldier tops $300,000.

I would think the total training investment in a veteran special ops person is a lot more than $300K.

21. November 2005 · Comments Off on Myths, Rites and Legends #17: Unspeakable Latrines · Categories: General, General Nonsense, Memoir, Military

It is a truism that travel broadens the mind, and brings the adventurous traveler in contact with many, many things— some of them elevated and educational and some of them mundane – and one of the mundane adventures is the exposure to the many, many different ways that human waste can be disposed of, ranging from the elaborate to the unspeakable.

The United States being, as Europeans are so tiresomely fond of reminding us, a relatively new country, our indoor plumbing arrangements are fairly recent and relatively standardized; rare (at least on the West Coast, and outside the historical districts) it is to encounter the old-fashioned toilet with the water tank up near the ceiling and a chain-pull hanging down, which releases the water, sending it thundering down the pipe to flush the bowl in one mighty, gravity-fed blast. But this was quite the usual sort I encountered in Europe- amusing, noisy, but fairly familiar and most usually clean.

Such is not always the case, as travelers find to their dismay- and even military standards of maintenance and cleanliness are not quite up to the challenge of keeping plumbing in a temporary building gone twenty-years over the originally expected lifetime up to par. This is, of course, a roundabout way of leading into my highly personal account of the Top Three Most Disgusting Public Lavatories I have ever encountered. No doubt, others have encountered worse, and are welcome to comment with the gruesome particulars.

The Third Most Disgusting was a little shed, an outhouse at the edge of a field, beside the road between Towada City and Lake Towada. There was actually nothing inside the shed save a hole in the floor of it and a fetid stench rising from the hole and the unspeakable pit underneath, a stench of such solidity in the heat of summer that you could practically see it, like the little ripples in the air over a cartoon skunk. And that was it— no paper of any sort, no water, just the little shed beside the road. It was the only thing resembling a public lavatory for miles – unless of course, you counted the benjo ditches, but not many Americans had the insouciance to use the ditches, not in broad daylight and in the open, anyway.

I regret to say that the Second Most Disgusting was actually the latrine at EBS-Zaragoza, a little cubicle at the end of a thirty-year old Quonset hut that housed the radio and engineering sections, which cubicle actually boasted a small window. The window saved it by a short head (no pun intended) from being a contender for First, in that it fresh air could be induced to enter, and dilute the potent reek emanating from the urinal. No matter how the cleaning lady scoured it, and no matter how many gallons of bleach and other cleansing agents we poured down it, on hot summer days the odor of crusted urine imbedded in thirty-year old plumbing beat them back and emerged triumphant, wafting down the corridor as far as the passage to the automation room. I hung a neatly lettered sign on the door to the latrine during one particularly hot summer; Warning: You are Now Entering The Bog of Incredible Stench, and everyone laughed their ass off, except for MSgt. Ken, the Station manager, who made me take it down.

The Most Disgusting Public Latrine in the west of the world actually was also in Spain; a service station restroom on the outskirts of San Roque, close by Gibraltar. I had to stop and fill the VEV’s gas tank, and both Blondie (then about 11 years old) and I badly needed to use the facilities. It was immediately apparent, from the moment that I opened the door at the back of the service station building, that the staff of the service station did not include any of the female persuasion. Not only was the toilet and sink caked with a unique assortment of filth, but a cardboard carton which performed as a waste basket – since a lot of facilities in Europe are incapable of digesting toilet paper it was full to overflowing with what in the good old US of A is normally flushed down the toilet – was covered with a moving carpet of enormous insects. Some kind of mutant daddy-long-legs was moving and seething, all over the carton of waste, the floor, the filthy sink and the walls. It looked for all the world like that scene in the first Indiana Jones movie with the cave full of tarantulas. My daughter took one horrified look at it, and said,
“Mom, I don’t have to go that bad!”
Unfortunately, I did. The bushes out at the back of the service station were thin and insubstantial, and I practically levitated a good ten inches over the disgusting seat. I have mercifully blocked out the name of the gas company – otherwise I would have advised nuking it from orbit, as the only way to make sure of it being cleansed from this earth.

Blondie has since made a practice of checking out the women’s restroom of any restaurant before she consumes anything from their menu, on the theory that if they can’t keep the can clean, the Deity knoweth what standards prevail in the kitchen. Words to live by, people, words to live by.

21. November 2005 · Comments Off on Among Those at War, Morale Remains Strong, for Now · Categories: GWOT, Iraq, Military

This from Tom Shanker at the NYTimes:

But in interviews conducted by The New York Times in recent months with more than 200 soldiers, sailors, airmen and marines stationed around the world, the sense emerged that the war had not broken the military – but that civilian leaders should not think for a moment that that could not happen.

[…]

While an overwhelming majority of those interviewed said their units had high morale and understood their mission, they expressed frustrations about long and repeated deployments to Iraq and Afghanistan.

Those deployments present the most significant problem for these troops, who were interviewed during a military correspondent’s travels in the war zone and around the world.

Even among those who have done tours in Iraq, most soldiers who were interviewed said they were willing to wait and see, at least through another yearlong rotation, before passing judgment. The December vote on a new Iraqi government and efforts to train local security forces offer at least the prospect of reductions in the American force by next summer.

But few wanted to talk about what would happen if, come next year or especially the year beyond, the military commitment to Iraq remained undiminished.

A growing percentage of ground troops are in Iraq or Afghanistan for a second or third tour. The Third Infantry Division, which led the drive to Baghdad in 2003, returned to Iraq this year with 65 percent of its troops having served previous tours.

Many of those returning to the combat zone said the latest tours were different. Bases in Iraq and Afghanistan show the money spent on infrastructure and recreation facilities. The hot food, air-conditioning, Internet facilities and giant gymnasium offered at major bases bolster morale in ways that may not be wholly understood by someone who has not just come off a dusty, dangerous patrol.

[…]

One indicator that military morale remains strong is the numbers of those who re-enlist while deployed.

“Our retention numbers are so high that it’s almost bizarre,” Rear Adm. Pete Daly, commander of Carrier Strike Group 11, said aboard the Nimitz while under way in the Persian Gulf.

Perhaps it is because, as many service members said, decisions about whether to continue with the military life are made not on the basis of what Congress or the president says, but out of the bond of loyalty they have come to share with their comrades in arms.

That does not help the military much when it comes to attracting new recruits. Troublesome questions about the cause in Iraq may be felt more severely among would-be troops than among those already in the military.

Many in uniform say it is the job of the nation’s political leaders to communicate the importance of the mission and the need for national sacrifice to a new generation of soldiers.

And then we have moonbats like this, condemning us for building “permanent” facilities in Iraq – with the obligatory PNAC reference. (Scroll down for my response.)

20. November 2005 · Comments Off on The Murtha Myth · Categories: Media Matters Not, Military, Politics

I was going to write my own post on this this morning. But, as David Adesnik at OxBlog has already done it, I’ll just link:

Two things to notice. First, Matthews’ introduction of Murtha perpetuates the myth that a renowned hawk has suddenly turned against the war. A renowned hawk is what Murtha is, but as many, many bloggers pointed out immediately after Murtha made headlines, he’s been saying exactly the same thing about Iraq for more than a year now. This is a manufactured story.

Second of all, it is remarkably disingenuous for Murtha to talk about how his recent visit to Iraq changed his mind about the war. If you listen to the full interview, he also lists a number of other recent data points as contributing factors. In other words, Murtha himself is now peddling the myth of his sudden conversion from hawk to dove. Karl Rove would be proud.

Murtha was on Meet the Press this morning. And Russert was more balanced in his interview than Matthews. But Murtha was perpetuating the ancillary myth that there was “no progress” being made in Iraq. But, as Austin Bay blogs here, that’s hardly the reality:

After my return from Iraq I received phone calls and emails from military friends as they either came back to the US on leave or finished their tours and re-deployed “Stateside.” The typical phone call went like this: “I’m back. It’s great to be home. What’s up? How are you doing?” Then, the conversation quickly moved on to: “What’s with the press and Iraq?” The press usually meant television. On tv Iraq looked like it was going to Hell in a handbasket of flame and brutality; however, the images of carnage didn’t square with the troops’ experience.

Today on StrategyPage, my good friend Jim Dunnigan takes on the subject of “troop/press dissonance” from his typically idiosyncratic angle. I’m going to quote from “There’s more going on in Iraq than a media event” at length. (As the essay notes, there is also more going on in Iraq than a war.) Visit StrategyPage and read the second story, “Journalism versus Reality.”

Murtha further stated that he couldn’t get the straight dope from commanders on the ground in Iraq “because they were afraid of retribution.” Then he repeated the Shinseki Myth. But surely that wouldn’t be the case when those same commanders are talking “off the record” to their friend and confidant, Bay.

Hat Tip: Glenn Reynolds, for both links.

19. November 2005 · Comments Off on This Begs Further Investigation · Categories: GWOT, Military

I’m still trying to make sense ot this story from the Charlotte Observer:

A majority of current and former military members surveyed this week in North Carolina disagree with how President Bush is handling the war in Iraq, according to a poll released Friday.

More than 56 percent of military members surveyed in an Elon University poll said they disapprove or strongly disapprove with how the president is running the war.

Nearly 53 percent disapprove or strongly disapprove of Bush’s overall job performance.

The results are startling because military members almost always overwhelmingly support wars and the president, said poll director Hunter Bacot.

“Members of military are mirroring the general public’s” attitude toward the war, he said. “That is very telling.”

[…]

War and N.C. Military

An Elon University telephone survey taken this week asked 80 current and former military if the war in Iraq was worth fighting. Here are the results:

Not worth it 28.8 percent (23)

Worth it 18.8 percent (15)

Don’t know 51.3 percent (41)

Refused to answer 1.3 percent (1)

18. November 2005 · Comments Off on Watch ‘Em Squirm! · Categories: Ain't That America?, GWOT, Iraq, Military, War

After Rep. Jack Murtha’s (D-PA) explosive comment yesterday that we cut and run, exiting Iraq immediately and surrendering a la Francaise, the US House is this afternoon in the midst of really heated argument. The reason, is that Republicans, wishing to get on the public record just exactly how these folks feel about this, have scheduled a vote for this evening on the question: “Do we terminate the war immediately and recall our troops from Iraq without delay, or do we press on to victory?”

This is one day that I have found real enjoyment in watching C-Span. Republicans are pressing their case, and Democrats are squirming and squealing like the greased pig at the picnic. Of course, aside from Charlie Rangel and a few others who simply don’t care what the American public thinks, no one in his or her right mind wants the American public to know that they want us to surrender the war on terror. No way are these leftist cowards going to vote publicly to just give up and surrender to the islamofascists. This is going to be fun to watch as the evening comes on. I predict a rout in favor of continuing on to total victory.

UPDATE: At nearly midnight, voting in the House is imminent. I have heard many speeches, some bloviating, some with their chests poked out, promoting themselves. But there have been some who have spoken who should be listened to. For instance, Rep. Sam Johnson (R-TX), who was a POW in Vietnam for seven years. When we left him in the Hanoi prison and left our comrades in Vietnam, he was horrified to think that his country had forgotten him and left him and the other POW’s to their fate, abandoned. What a sad chapter in our national history. I hope sincerely that we do not repeat this mistake again. Others who spoke and clearly do not support our troops nearly made me weep for their errors of judgement.

The vote is in progress now, clearly defeated, with something like 3 votes in favor of cutting and running. Those who so voted should be turned out of the house by their constituents, as they do not deserve the office they hold.

There certainly are some things that need to be changed in this war. First, the Pentagon needs to recognize that we need about 40% more troops in the region, a move that would certainly, I believe, shorten our need to be there. Second, we do need the Administration to be more forthcoming in what our plan for victory is. Someone needs to get the MSM to be more balanced in their reporting of what is going on over there, and I would throw out the suggestion that a very loud and strong boycott of the left-leaning, defeatist and one-sided media organizations may be effective. These are only a couple of suggestions intended to get the reader into the thinking mode, Perhaps some of our readers have more suggestions, better ones than I propose, and my intent here is to get you involved and to tell us what you think. Simply commenting to shoot this post in the foot is not productive, and personal attacks on anyone have no place here. Come on, folks. What do you think?

With no time left remaining on the vote, the totals right now are:
In favor of surrender, 3. In favor of staying to victory, 403. Members who did not vote numbered 22. No question where this is going, only three have put their career on the line by voting to cut and run, while the rest of the US House are telling us that they want to stay and finish the mission. Whether or not this is their real, heartfelt choice, we will see in the future what happens. Let’s see how the MSM spins this, and let’s add our voices to the House, in favor of victory.

11. November 2005 · Comments Off on Veteran’s Day Speech · Categories: Military, Veteran's Affairs

Thanks for all the great ideas for my Vet’s Day speech at the university. It went well, although (sadly) it wasn’t well attended. Here’s the text of my comments from the ceremony:

We commemorate Veteran’s Day as a day to honor those who have served our nation as members of the Armed Forces. Many – too many, in fact – have fought and died defending our freedom or helping others establish their freedom. Many more fought and survived, thankfully. Still others saw no battle at all but played an important part in keeping our nation safe, and they stood ready (and stand ready) to do more should America need them.

I fall into this last category. I don’t have a compelling “war story.” I can’t provide a “there I was” moment. But I did my part and made a difference.

I entered the Air Force at the height of the Cold War. It’s probably hard for most students to imagine these days, but the Soviet threat was real. The possibility of thermonuclear war was not easily dismissed. My first duty station was a radar site whose primary mission was to detect a Submarine Launched Ballistic Missile attack. As a 22-year-old Second Lieutenant, I was responsible for the software that ensured this radar did its job of tracking missiles. It sure seemed real to me.

Later, as a young Captain, I provided technical expertise to tactical air analysts trying to determine the best response to potential Communist aggression in Europe or Asia. Halfway through my military career, the Berlin Wall came down, the Iron Curtain fell, and the once-mighty Soviet Empire disappeared in what seemed like the blink of an eye. That was about 15 years ago now, so for many of you, the Cold War is just another couple of chapters, sections, maybe just pages, in your history books.

I wanted to make sure you knew that this was not history for many of us. I write occasionally for a blog called “The Daily Brief” at sgtstryker.com. It’s a group blog with contributors who are former and current military members. I asked on the blog last week what folks would want me to talk about today, especially as it relates to the Cold War. Here are some of their thoughts:

  • One wanted me to mention the Berlin Airlift. If you’re unaware of this, you should really find out more about it. The Berlin Airlift showed the resolve of a nation (actually, nations) to keep its commitments to the people of Berlin in the face of Soviet aggression by means of a blockade.*
  • One commenter suggested that I talk about the Fleet Ballistic Missile submarines that patrolled the waters of the world, providing an unseen yet real deterrent. These guys never went to war but always, always prepared for it. Not a job many of us would have relished. True sacrifice in terms of time, family, and stress.
  • Yet another recommended that I make sure you know the grim reality of this period in American history. In spite of the fact that the Cold War was “Cold,” that we never actually went to war with the Soviets, many lost their lives in training exercises or by being involved in other dangerous activities necessary for us to maintain constant readiness. This doesn’t even take in account that the Cold War encompassed both the Korean Conflict and Vietnam.

In the absence of real war, lives are still lost.

The point is that during the Cold War, the threat to freedom and our way of life was real, and there were those willing to pay the highest price to protect us. And this has been the case ever since November 11 was established as a remembrance day at the close of World War I. The threat existed with the Germans in WWI, then the Axis powers in WWII, the Soviets during the Cold War; and it remains with the seen and unseen enemies in today’s Global War on Terrorism.

The best way I can think of to honor veterans today is to give you a sense of why they are willing to do what they do. I’d like to close by reading a selection that I think reflects the feelings of a lot of soldiers, sailors, and airmen.

This is from a letter written by Lt Walter Shuette during World War II to his newborn daughter Anna Mary. It was to be read to Anna Mary on her 10th birthday should her father not make it home. The entire letter is printed in a book edited by Andrew Carroll called “War Letters”** and it is tempting to read the whole thing. But I’ll settle for this small piece:

“Also I pray that the efforts of your daddy and his buddies will not have been in vain. That you will always be permitted to enjoy the great freedoms for which this war is being fought. It is not pleasant, but knowing that our efforts are to be for the good of our children makes it worth the hardships.”

As it turns out, Lt Shuette came back from the war and at Anna Mary’s 10th birthday, he read this letter to her himself.

I don’t mean to suggest that all those who fought or served did so with such altruistic intentions. Or that all of them believed deeply in what they were fighting for. Indeed, we make no such distinctions on Veteran’s Day. All who served deserve our thanks. And all who serve today deserve our continuing gratitude, as well as our heartfelt prayers.

Today is a Federal holiday. In places with a large Federal presence, it’s easier to remember that it’s Veteran’s Day, if only because so many Federal employees are away from work. Except for ceremonies like this, Veteran’s Day could easily be forgotten in a place like Cullowhee. I urge you never to forget. Whenever you think about the freedoms afforded you in this country, remember the price that has been paid to obtain and defend them. May the remainder of your day be spent enjoying those freedoms – it’s an appropriate commemoration for this Veteran’s Day.

——Update 11/13/2005
* I really need to do a better job of acknowledging sources. When I was preparing my talk, I went to Britannica Online (“Berlin blockade and airlift.” Encyclopædia Britannica. 2005 – subscription required) to double-check the dates of the Airlift. The last line of the article is “(a)s a result of the blockade and airlift, Berlin became a symbol of the Allies’ willingness to oppose further Soviet expansion in Europe.” There’s no doubt that this inspired the last line of my comments about the Airlift. Also, until I read that article, I didn’t know that Britain was involved in the Airlift.

** Corrected to provide an Amazon link to Carroll’s book and also to fix the spelling of his first name. The book was published by Scribner in 2001. I received a condensed version a few years ago from the VFW.

Sorry for being so pedantic. It’s the academic in me, I guess.

10. November 2005 · Comments Off on Which Soldier Type Are You? · Categories: General, Military

Well, this would explain a lot, actually…

You scored as Engineer. Military Engineer. Your job is usually overlooked, but without you nothing gets done. While you sometimes annoyed at this, and you know the only time people come to you is when there’s something wrong. You understand that you are the heart and soul of any organization with honesty and nice work ethic to boot.

“I need more Duct Tape!!!”

Engineer

75%

Medic

50%

Special Ops

50%

Support Gunner

44%

Combat Infantry

44%

Officer

44%

Artillery

19%

Civilian

13%

Which soldier type are you?
created with QuizFarm.com

10. November 2005 · Comments Off on HAPPY BIRTHDAY, USMC!! · Categories: General, History, Military

Cpl.Blondie, at the USMC Ball

Cpl. Blondie, at the USMC Ball

Founded November 10th, 1775, still going strong, and smiting our enemies where’er they be found. Happy 230th Birthday, USMC.

(Yes, I know a bit of hair is over her collar. Her problem, not mine. Deal with it.)

10. November 2005 · Comments Off on Happy Birthday, Marines! · Categories: Military

230 and still going strong! You don’t look at day over 35!

08. November 2005 · Comments Off on House Members Want Info On Military’s Human Guinea Pigs · Categories: Military, Science!, Veteran's Affairs

This from CNN:

WASHINGTON (CNN) — The United States should establish a commission to identify and learn the fate of people exposed during the military’s secret testing of chemical and biological materials in the 1960s and ’70s, two House lawmakers declared Tuesday.

“We cannot be afraid to identify the problem,” said Montana Republican Denny Rehberg, who, along with California Democrat Mike Thompson, plans to introduce a bill they call the “Veterans Right to Know Act.”

Nearly 5,900 people, both military and civilians, may have been exposed to the toxins as part of the military’s “Project 112,” involving about 50 tests from 1962 to 1974, according to a report last year from the Government Accounting Office. –From CNN’s Paul Courson on Capitol Hill (Posted 2:53 p.m.)

08. November 2005 · Comments Off on Memo: Military Fact Checking · Categories: General, GWOT, Iraq, Media Matters Not, Military

To: Major Media Orgs
From: Sgt Mom
Re: The Wonderful World of the Military

1. It looks like a number of otherwise reputable and professionally skeptical reporters and media outlets have been shown up… yet AGAIN as a bunch of gullible rubes, by a military veteran telling horrible stories of American-committed wartime atrocities. Well, at least, it was a real veteran this time, somewhat of an improvement as far as these things go. And this person was actually in the country, and in the neighborhood of the incidents which formed the initial inspiration of the atrocities to which he claimed to bear witness. But there were scads of other people there at the same time, none of whom seem to back up his soul-searing accounts of atrocities against Iraqi nationals.

2. This is an improvement, of a dubious sort, as far as telling improbable tales is concerned. In the immortal words of Pooh Bah, being at least verifiably in the right country, and at the right time can constitute “…corroborative detail, intended to give artistic verisimilitude to an otherwise bald and unconvincing narrative.”

3. However, it seems you have not properly assimilated the point of my previous memo, on the subject of military fantasists. Your loss more than mine, I daresay. (And you have obviously not taken to heart the saying about “that, which is too good to be true, probably isn’t.”)

4. To reiterate my main point from my earlier memo: The life military is lived, perforce, cheek by jowl with others. Very little happens in the military world that is not witnessed by others, supported by others, planned by others, reported upon afterwards by others. Practically every significant event to which a military unit is party, amounts to a public forum. Given a specific unit, a specific location, and a specific date, there should rightfully be clouds of other witnesses, to such astonishing and horrific events. That no one else in SSgt. Massey’s unit, or reporters and photographers present at the time, will back his accounts of events speaks volumes. That it took a year for a news story concluding that such substantiation is conspicuously lacking speaks a whole library of them.

5. It would seem that there are indeed two classes of news story in this sad and wicked world. One sort of story is gone over exhaustively, researched extensively, picked apart down to the sub-atomic level, and every participant grilled slowly over an open fire and basted with a skeptical sauce. The other sort is a delicate and precious pearl, gently handled and buffed with flannel, lest it’s luster be dimmed. Frankly, I’d leave the second sort to the celebrity pages, and have the first sort applied equally across the board. At least then, journalism would stand a chance in recovering a portion of the respect in which it was formerly held.

6. Finally I would also be wary of any informant who claims to be a veteran… but says that his DD214 is either classified, or that the military authorities faked it to cover up what he was really doing. Really people— in the news business, skepticism is a virtue when applied across the board.

Sincerely
Sgt Mom

05. November 2005 · Comments Off on Gunner Palace On The Military Channel · Categories: Military, That's Entertainment!

I had forgotten to post on this earlier, but the Military Channel is currently airing Gunner Palace, with an encore in three hours.

Their sister channel, Discovery Times, is also having an Off to War marathon – yawn.