05. July 2006 · Comments Off on Rockstar Supernova · Categories: That's Entertainment!

I watched the first show of the new season tonight and I have to say, at least ten of the singers were too good to front a band with Tommy Lee.

But I’ve never been a fan. I mean the Pam Anderson video was impressive in a Bawm Chicka Bawm-Bawm kind of way, but as a musician…meh.

I’ll keep watching it though because at two of the girls and three of the guys have killer voices, and most of the gals are just plain HAWT in an authentic rock chick kind of way. And maybe I’m going through a midlife crisis, but I just find that makes me tingly in my happy places.

I know, I know, TMI Timmer, but hey, it’s been a hard day. Nothing like doing Monday, Tuesday and Wednesday all in one day.

02. July 2006 · Comments Off on The Lit-Major’s Game · Categories: Fun and Games, General, That's Entertainment!

When I was whiling away a couple of years at Cal State, earning a professionally useless but amusing degree in English, my classmates and I used to entertain ourselves by working out what certain towering figures in literature would be doing, if they were professionally functioning in the arts and letters of the present- or just the last quarter of the 20th century. What would they be writing, and what sort of writing— and given that movies and television would be in the mix— what variant of creativity would be within the scope of time-transplanted literary talent?
There aren’t any definitive answers, of course; the only requirement is to be able to extrapolate amusingly. Herewith some of the proposed 20th-century career paths:

William Shakespeare: Actor turned writer; the movies, of course. Wildly popular, prolific and all over the map, quality-wise, over a long, long career.

Mark Twain: Reporter and writer of very fine magazine articles on popular culture and commentary, and the occasional book. Pretty much what Tom Wolfe, or PJ. O Rourke does now.

Henry James: Still a novelist, producing exquisitely wrought and finely detailed novels. Very high-brow, lots of literary prizes, but not very widely read. Never an Oprah Book Club selection.

Edith Wharton: Ditto.

William Thackeray: Witty, roman-a-clef novels, about people on the fringes of power in various establishments. The public is vastly amused with every one, trying to figure out who they “really” are about. Threatened with legal action on occasion, which just boosts sales figures.

Charles Dickens: Writer and producer of very long, and involved, and wildly popular TV series/miniseries. All of them have long story arcs, many eccentric characters, and enough turns and twists to keep the audiences’ attention riveted for years.

Rudyard Kipling: Also a newspaper reporter turned novelist, poet and short story writer, and entertainer. Doing what Garrison Keillor does now, even to the radio show.

Sir Walter Scott: Enormously popular writer of historical adventures based on historical figures. James Michener, only shorter.

Louisa May Alcott: Empowering chick-lit. Frequent Oprah guest, and Book Club selection.

Jules Verne: Science fiction, of course— but through the medium of interactive video games.

And to cross over into classical music, Richard Wagner would be doing movies too: very elaborate, special-effects laden, Kubrick-ish blockbusters, with thunderous musical scores and eye-catching set-pieces. They would be very popular, and the critics would come away from press showings bubbling over with ecstatic praise, even though they wouldn’t quite understand a lot of it.

Add your own, elaborate on or propose alternatives for mine: just be creative and above all, amusing.

29. June 2006 · Comments Off on Who’s Ripped Off Neil Diamond? · Categories: Fun and Games, That's Entertainment!

This thread over at FTTW got me thinking. (And post your first concert experience while you’re at it.)

How many different bands/songwriters have ripped off Neil Diamond?

The first one that comes to my mind is “What I Like About You” by The Romantics. I remember a DJ at “Crackers” in Vegas (great rock barn) back in ’85 used to fade “What I Like About You” right into “Cherry, Cherry” and my roommate freaked when he found out that was Neil Diamond. Actually, now that I think about it, my MOM freaked when she found out “her” Neil wrote “Cherry, Cherry.”

But I don’t know how many times I’ve heard a song and said to myself, “Wait a minute, that’s a Neil Diamond riff.”

So what else can you think of?

23. June 2006 · Comments Off on Hammersmith Odeon, London ’75 · Categories: That's Entertainment!

Hammersmith Odeon, London ’75 may be the most legendary Springsteen Album that never was…until recently. I had a copy on vinyl that I bought in ’76 from the “Rare and Collectable” store in my neighborhood. When Springsteen broke big in Chicago in the early 80s, due to some play at the Steppenwolf, before Born in the USA, all of sudden, my Springsteen collection was requested with my presence at various and sundry parties. Everyone wanted to tape a copy of it…from the vinyl. Ummm, no, but you can borrow my tape. The vinyl copy disappeard years ago and I long since wore out the last good taped copy I had.

I almost lost it when I found out that it had been remixed by Bob Clearmountain and “officially” released on Columbia. Ya see, to me, this is Springsteen. It’s live, it’s raw as hell, E-Street was still jamming, testing one another out. Outside of actually attending a live performance, this is the album that converted disbelievers.

If you didn’t grow up in a city of over a million folks, don’t tell me how you never got Springsteen…I know. Trying to explain street rythms to you is sort of like you dumping me in the middle of nowhere and trying to radio in how you want me to track a deer. And if you did grow up in a city of over a million and you still don’t get it…I don’t know what to tell ya. This is the music that spoke to my teenage heart and often times kept me alive, which is another long story that I’m not ready to tell you about yet.

I was going to write a song by song but it would just be my opinion mixed with 30 year old emotions streaming back.

If you just kinda like old Springsteen and have often wondered what all the buzz was about. THIS is the album you want to buy. If you’ve already got it on vinyl tucked away safe and sneer at a CD or digital version, I’ve got to tell you, the freaking keyboards never sounded this good on vinyl and I don’t know how they got the bass response amped up, but then, I had a bootleg piece of vinyl and not a master to work off of.

20. June 2006 · Comments Off on Somebody HURT Them · Categories: Eat, Drink and be Merry, General Nonsense, That's Entertainment!

Via Althouse.

I don’t agree with her on this one.

Oh it’s clever. But not being a “morning person,” I have to say that it disturbs me on a fundamental level. I don’t have “a happy morning” until at least two cups of coffee and some time.

Although…I do like that brand of coffee and really like the handle built into the plastic can.

14. June 2006 · Comments Off on f.t.t.w. Top 100 Punk Songs · Categories: That's Entertainment!

Don’t forget Michele and Turtle need your help with their “100 Greatest Punk Songs.” Voting has begun. As we say in Chicago, “Vote early, vote often.”

13. June 2006 · Comments Off on …but at night, in the presence of evil… · Categories: That's Entertainment!

Ghost Rider.

The trailers are out. Looks like a February 2007 release.

I’m still not sure I would have chosen Nicolas Cage. I see Johnny Blaze as a younger guy with the world on his shoulders. And seriously, you’d think they could find a decent rug for him. It’s not like they didn’t have a budget. The thing on his head for the promotional photos looks like a spider died.

On the plus side, Eva Mendes from Hitch is his love interest.

Directed by Mark Steven Johnson who directed and wrote Daredevil and Elektra. Say what you want about either of those movies, the writing/directing was not the problem. The fact that he wrote Simon Birch and the Grumpy Old Men movies makes him a favorite of mine too.

10. June 2006 · Comments Off on Top 100 Rock Songs Sifting Through The Hits · Categories: That's Entertainment!

Thanks for all of your inputs, I’m getting my list narrowed down and now I need your help sifting out the best songs from various bands and artists. I’m trying not to repeat artists. So what’s the best piece of work from each of the following? Please state your case.

Bruce Springsteen (Knee jerk is to just put “Born to Run” on the list and call it good, but come on, there’s over a quarter century of music after that. Anything off his “I’m not satisfied with being The Boss, I must be Woodie Guthrie” albums while be ignored with contempt.)

Eric Clapton (Keep it to his solo work. I know, doesn’t help much but…)

The Clash (London Calling? White Riot? Train in Vain? I’m So Bored with the U.S.A.?)

Elvis Costello (Love his initial work in the 70s and 80s. My gut tells me it should be “Radio Radio” but “Oliver’s Army” was almost 20 years ahead of its time.)

Elvis Presley (Devil in Disguise? Hound Dog? Heartbreak Hotel? Suspicious Minds? What song says “ELVIS” to you?)

Def Leppard (Shaddup. When they were good, they were VERY good. But what’s their best?)

Grateful Dead (My favorite Dead song is and always has been “Ripple,” long story that has nothing to do with Cher as a biker chick. But what’s their best song for this list? I’m leaning toward “China Cat Sunflower” but I can be persuaded.)

Green Day (Holiday. We Are the Waiting. Right now it’s between those two. Please no political rants on what’s wrong with “American Idiot,” I’m ignoring politics from now on, but that’s another post.)

Led Zepplin (I’m one of those guys that came late to the Zepplin altar. There’s too much there that I really love. Kashmir is one of those songs that just gets better the more you pay attention to it, but I can say that about most of IV also.)

Pink Floyd (For me, The Wall isn’t even in my library. Never got it. They tell me if I did acid I’d understand…shrug. Still, is it “Money” or something else?)

Santana (I still listen to Supernatural quite a bit, but ignoring his earlier work is criminal.)

Steely Dan (For those of you who froth and holler, “But they’re JAZZ!” umm, okay, whatever, take away my rock’n’roll shoes, but you narrow down their library to ONE good song. I’d be happy if I could narrow it down to a favorite album.)

The Ramones (Blitzkrieg Bop? Sheena is a Punk Rocker? Rock and Roll Radio?)

U2 (Again, I’m not sure what’s my favorite album, much less my favorite song. Some days it’s “Mysterious Ways” and others it’s “One.” Any live version of “Sunday Bloody Sunday” gets my heart going too. Talk me into something.)

ZZ Top (Legs? Sharp Dressed Man? La Grange? Which version of the Texas Shuffle do you prefer?)

As I’ve been working on this I realized that my criteria has narrowed simply out of neccessity. What this really is, is sort of a Rock Soundtrack to my life.

01. June 2006 · Comments Off on Top 100 Rock Songs · Categories: That's Entertainment!

The lead character in this book gets an iPod from his wife for his birthday along with a gift card for 100 free downloads off iTunes. He decides he’s going to put together a list of the Top 100 Rock Songs Ever.

I’m not going to post the character’s list here but I’ve used it as sort of a base to try to put together My Favorite 100 Rock Songs of all Time List. I’m not going to share that with you…yet. I’m sure I’m missing some so I come to you gentle readers, begging for your suggestions.

Just to let you know a couple/few things:

1. I’m not putting any Beatles or Stones on my list. I know to some of you that’s heresy of the highest order. I’m not going to argue with you about it. I can’t listen to either of those bands anymore. Just. Can’t. Shrug, sorry.

2. Make sure you’re not stretching the “Rock” limits. Much of the old Motown Catolog can count, but anything pure hip-hop or gansta, probably won’t make it. Rap-Rock Fusion is fine. Country Rock is fine, Hank Williams Senior, not so much. Speed Metal, Death Metal, anything heavier than say Anthrax…probably won’t make it either. Yeah, I’m in my 40s, and yeah, I find a lot of the heavier stuff just plain annoying.

3. Keep your suggestions to 10 or less. I don’t want this to turn into YOUR Top 100. I’m just looking for anything I may have missed. Try to avoid repeats. If you’ve already seen “Kashmir” then don’t please don’t post it again. I would love some discussion so “me too” comments are inevitable, but let’s keep it reasonable.

So have at it music fans, I need your input, I want this to be the best Top 100 I can put together.

When we’re done, we can start on the order.

Almost Forgot: Michele and Turtle are looking for help with their Top 100 Punk Song List over at Faster Than the World. If you want to narrow your list to the Punk Genre, that’s the place to do it.

27. May 2006 · Comments Off on X-Men: The Last Stand · Categories: That's Entertainment!

Wow! That was a blast. Not to mention a total geek fest. There are nods to almost every classic science fiction movie and some books to boot. Bonus points to the first one to post the obvious Heinlein reference.

In case no one’s told you yet. There’s one more brief scene after the credits run. I’m not sure if it was worth it or not and the folks at the movie theater didn’t seem to care as they turned on the lights and were cleaning before it was over, but it does make you wonder how much of a “last X-Men” movie this is really going to be.

Oh, and nobody even mentions Jesus in this movie. Feel better?

UPDATE: Spoiler in the comments for those who saw the movie but walked out before the last scene after the credits.

27. May 2006 · Comments Off on The Ultimate Da Vinci Code Review · Categories: Fun and Games, General, That's Entertainment!, The Funny

“You know when you talk,” says one of my co-workers with some exasperation, “Sometimes it sounds to me like the parents and teachers in those “Charlie Brown” cartoons… you know, just ‘bwah-bwah-bwaw’? I know you’re saying something, but I can’t understand a single word of it!”

My bad, making an allusion to a 19th century poem in casual conversation, but then I grew up thinking Osbert Lancaster was hilarious (especially “Here of All Places” which permanently warped my tastes in architecture and descriptions of same ) . She probably won’t get much from the funniest take on the Da Vinci Code that I have read so far… but perhaps some of you might… especially if you took a class where the prof insisted on playing recordings of Old English readings.

(link found through Manolo)

26. May 2006 · Comments Off on Lady and gentlemen, start your engines · Categories: Ain't That America?, Fun and Games, General, That's Entertainment!

Since our company got involved in torque sensing for F1 racing a few years ago and the divorce between Champ cars and Indy cars played itself out, the only open wheel racing that I follow outside of F1 is the Indy 500. Before it was televised, I remember listening to it on the radio even as a child, having lived in a family with a long history of involvement in stock and super-modified racing throughout NY, PA and New England in the fifties and sixties. Women drivers have been an on and off presence at Indy since 1976 (previously Janet Guthrie, Lyn St. James, and Sarah Fisher), but, in my view, were more of a novelty than a serious trend.

Last year’s Indy 500 was absolutely GREAT because Danica Patrick showed, finally, that a woman driver could mix it up with the best the IRL had to offer. Although finishing fourth, she led for several laps and showed a degree of cool fierceness that was lacking in those of the fairer sex who preceded her (Sgt Mom and Cpl Blondie, I am being careful here). This year she starts somewhat lower in the field (inside row 4), but I am confident she will put on a great show. Check it out (Sun. 1:00 CST)

Next week the Indy teams will race at Watkins Glenn, former home of the U.S. Grand Prix. Back in my day, I worked a food concession there all through high school and got to (sort of) see the Trans Am (Camaro, ‘Cuda, Mustang), Can Am (anybody remember Chaperral?) and F1 races from ’68 through ’72. What a dream job. After having been closed for a couple decades, Nascar has raced stockers and trucks at the Glen the last few years, but it will be great to see open wheel racing there again.

Also note that the Monaco F1 Grand Prix is Sunday morning – televised early on SpeedTV. I personally think that Monaco is the premier F1 event because of (a) the difficulty of the street course and (b) the decadent wealth that permeates the entire event (including the 100+ ft cruisers in the harbor).

See you at the track.

Radar

18. May 2006 · Comments Off on The Dead Hand · Categories: General, History, Media Matters Not, Pajama Game, That's Entertainment!

Once upon a dark and distant time in military broadcasting overseas, the only thing there was in the weekly television broadcast package that resembled daytime talk shows as we now know them was Phil Donahue, which we used to rather enjoy in a mild sort of way. It was occasionally intelligent, mostly interesting, and the host seemed to treat the guests and audience with friendly interest and respect. As such, it was easy to take— the give and take, the various viewpoints and inputs— especially in the small bites dished up on the AFRTS program schedule. How little we knew, that out of this innocent, and fairly innocuous chrysalis would blunder the ilk of Jerry Springer, the king of trailer-trash cat-fights, and the omnipotent Oprah, amongst others to horrible to mention. A mere decade later, we would be channel-surfing the wilderness of mid-day talk shows on the break-room television, looking for the trans-gendered/transvestite hookers which would inevitably be featured on one or another of them during the week – usually by Wednesday, Monday during sweeps week.

But one of the guests featured in the dear, long-gone innocent early days of Phil Donohue, was a veteran teacher who had garnered a small bit of fame by establishing a college-prep academy in the heart of one of the nastier big-city ghettoes. By all accounts, she was a gifted, hard-driving teacher, as demanding as any military TI – and like the TI, had hit upon success by working her charges hard, and keeping them too busy to be any more than exhausted – too exhausted to even think about getting up to counter-productive mischief. By all the print media accounts, she was a miracle worker, transforming academically floundering African-American ghetto kids into well-educated college-intake bound citizens, well-suited to join any freshman class at the more exacting institutes of higher education. To the best of our knowledge, reading the advance Teletips, this was the first time she had appeared on any of the limited television venues available to us overseas, and those of us who had even heard of her were at least a little intrigued.

The miracle-working teacher turned out to be a middle-aged black woman, very thin, very intense, and with very scary, piercing eyes; the eyes of a fanatic, I thought. She seemed to quiver with suppressed emotion; an emotion held on a very tight leash. She was accompanied onto the talk show set by her lawyer, which should have been some kind of clue to her expectations of the whole interview, but somewhat – well, overdrawn, given that the audience was cordial, curious and quite interested in her experience and insights, to judge from the initial questions from the moderator and the audience. It started off well, what with her explaining her goals, methods and intentions; I thought she was being a little more confrontational than the audience merited, what with the lawyer and all, though. I really don’t recall with any precision the actual racial mix of the audience, probably something around the average for this sort of thing, at that point in time, and in that place (Chicago, if memory and Google serve) but again, interested, respectful, polite, and her answers reasonable and well-considered, right up until she fielded a question from a middle-aged white guy about why she had picked Milton’s Paradise Lost as part of the English syllabus; what could that particular work have to say to the average black, inner-city ghetto kid, and how did she go about making it relevant— (that dearly beloved buzzword of the time.)
I thought it was a fair question— Paradise Lost is one of those difficult, old-fashioned classical English-lit texts. I didn’t encounter it myself in any depth at all until college and then only wading in to about shin-deep. There are any number of thoughtful, honest answers to be had to that question: Personally, I thought she may have been trying to best the best of the old-fashioned, beating those rigorous and retro prep-academies at their own game, throwing down an academic challenge, going toe to toe in teaching the classics that are the foundation of Western thought and literary tradition. She would have made points by explaining how she wanted to graduate pupils who were erudite, the equal of anything the well-endowed and exclusive— and expensive—academies could turn out, to prove that her disadvantaged sow’s ears of inner-city materials were capable of being woven into silk purses. She might also have expounded, as did another teacher of the classics that I read of a couple of decades later, who wrote about how he went about teaching the classical core texts to dead-enders and no-hopers, thinking that it would give his students a way to cope with human experience, by giving a means to touch the divine, and thereby becoming fully-realized, thoughtful human beings. Or pointed out (as did another teacher of the classics, possibly the same one, since I have near-perfect recall of the ideas I read about, but not the personnel responsible for them, or the venue that I read of them) that things like the Iliad and the Mort d’Arthur and Beowulf actually spoke with a more resounding voice to inner-city gangster youth than it did to middle-class preppies, what with it’s world of violence, ritual and touchy personal honor. But it appeared that the emotion on a short leash was anger, and the leash was readily snapped.

No, the genius woman teacher, with the fanatic eyes, and the lawyer in tow, took off after the poor, unwary white guy that had asked a seemingly reasonable question. She chewed him up one side, and lectured him down the other, calling him a racist, and several other sorts of horrible, nasty human being for even daring, even presuming to ask that question; having her lawyer along for the ride might have been a good idea, all the way around. The chill on any additional questioning was perceptible; the notion of any more easy and honest and collegiate give-and-take exchange was pretty well killed from that moment on. No one in the audience wanted to hurt anyone’s feelings, or to be screamed at, and called a racist. And so, any number of pertinent or interesting questions were strangled before they were even asked, because no one dared to ask them for fear of being thought rude, or a racist, or whatever, even if the answers to the unspoken questions might be interesting, or relevant. It does no one any favors to not even to dare ask the questions, and open them up for air, and discussion and disputation� never mind answering them -even if the answer is ambiguous.

17. May 2006 · Comments Off on New Blog from Robert Ferrigno · Categories: Site News, That's Entertainment!

Robert Ferrigno, Author of Prayers For The Assassin is blogging. His latest post, Ahmadinejad and the Hidden Imam is about, well, The President of Iran and the Twelfth Imam.

Disclaimer: Other than sending me an advance copy of his book, I’ve received nothing but email correspondence from Robert. I’m a fan. I find the way he explains the Muslim world interesting and that’s saying a lot from a guy like me who resents having to know anything about that part of the world.

09. May 2006 · Comments Off on I Might as Well Buy Boyo His Own Computer · Categories: Fun and Games, Technology, That's Entertainment!

The Playstation 3 has been announced. In two versions, $499.00 and $599.00.

Five and six hundred dollars for a game box.

What the HELL are they thinking?

28. April 2006 · Comments Off on How Americans Die: United 93 · Categories: General, GWOT, Pajama Game, That's Entertainment!

Several years ago, I lamented on this very blog, how no movies had come out of Hollywood post-9/11 that told our stories of heroism in the ongoing war against the forces of militantly jihadist Islam. I can’t find that particular entry among four years worth of tri-weekly posts, since I can’t remember what I called it, but I remember pointing out that the dust was barely settled on our WWII defeats at Bataan, and Wake Island, before Hollywood had rushed out stories focusing on the heroic resistance, and our national resolve.

Where were our stories in this new war, where was Hollywood— did our current entertainment moguls feel above the vulgar business of telling our stories, and processing our heartbreaking experiences, defining who we are, and what we are fighting against? Of course, pace the Danish Cartoons experience, it might very well be that our movie moguls and stars are as fearful as anyone else of a car-bomb at Wolfgang Pucks’, or the oh-so-subtle gentlemen from CAIR parked in the outer office, and just as prone as the national big-media to surrender pre-emptively, and refrain from producing anything that would piss them off… or encourage the great unwashed American public to embrace their inner Jacksonian.

I felt obliged to go and see United 93, since it was exactly the sort of movie that Hollywood ought to have been producing; they should have done about thirty to fifty of this sort (well, counting TV movies and film releases together), and started at it three or four years ago. Well, it’s nice that someone in Hollywood finally gets it… a couple of years late, but better than not at all. I did not go to it, expecting to have a good time: the ticket-taker said automatically as he tore my ticket in half.
“Enjoy your movie,” and I replied
“Well that wasn’t exactly my plan.” Poor man, there is probably a picture of him next to the definition of “prematurely aged, hopelessly out-of-touch, fashion-challenged movie geek” in some vast cosmic dictionary.

The theater where I watched it was eventually half-filled. It was the mid-afternoon showing, on a day when most people in San Antonio have had a half day, or maybe the whole day off because of the Battle of Flowers Parade (explanation of this in another post— it’s just a local holiday, ‘kay?) No idea of it would have been a typical or atypical crowd, but I did notice that everyone was fairly quiet before the movie began, and near to silent when it ended. It’s not a movie you go to for laughs, jollies and temporary forgetting of your current problems.
It opens to the sound of Muslim prayers, in the darkness before dawn on an ordinary day. Only the unsettling image of the hijackers shaving and dressing themselves, and being extraordinarily diligent about their early prayers strikes any sort of ominous note— that and the image of four weedy, dark-haired men, sitting uneasily amongst the people they intended to murder— gives a hint of what happens next.

It’s all one of those prosaic, ordinary working days, people going to work, doing what they do every day of their working life, everything routine, banal, swapping the ordinary sort of work-related remarks, small stuff, chit-chat, all about work and what is expected during the course of an ordinary working day. The Air Force has got an exercise on, that’s the only out-of-routine thing happening. And everything is so ordinary about taking an early morning flight to the west coast, all those plain, unglamorous, lumpish people on the same flight. I had begun to think that Hollywood was incapable of making a movie with ordinary-looking people in it, but on this occasion, the temptation to cast the blindingly-attractive actor sorts was resisted, with the result that United 93 has a very documentary feel about it, with no one in it that you remember having seen in another role, and another show. (The air traffic control staff played themselves— which lent enormously to the documentary feel.) No one is really named, aside from the pilots, and some of the air control staff, and some of the Air Force people— there is no distracting back-story for any of the characters… it is all just the story of the morning of 9/11, quick and brutal and to the point.

It all happens in something very much like real time; all the ordinary stuff on an ordinary morning; sitting around in the gate area, until called to be seated, the cabin staff going by, towing their bags and laughing amongst themselves. If you’ve traveled by air in the last thirty years, it’s all familiar, down to being dragged to pay attention to the safety briefing, although it’s something you have heard a hundred times before, and that is the gripping part— we’ve all been there, we can see it happening, and to people very much like us.

It’s a very claustrophobic movie; there are very few outdoor shots, aside from some establishing views of airport runways, and a couple of long exterior shots of the New York skyline, taken from inside a flight control facility. Otherwise, it’s all interiors, very tight and very close, almost painfully intimate, as 9/11 starts to get very weird and very un-ordinary. The jolting moment when the air controllers watch the second aircraft slice into the WTC tower is shattering… just as shattering as it was—or so I have been told— as it was to people watching on that awful, shattering day. (I wasn’t one of them, I came late to the party, and was listening on radio.)

The last twenty minutes or so are very intense, extra-claustrophobic, in the confines of an aircraft cabin. (I may very possibly never fly commercially again. ) The passengers and surviving cabin staff huddle in the back of the aircraft, stealthily make phone calls, work out what has happened, deduce what will probably happen to them, decide to resist, cobble out a desperate plan; the last few minutes are a mad, disjointed frenzy, filmed on a shaky hand-held camera. A few grace moments: a middle-aged woman making a last tearful call to her family on her cell phone cuts it short, and hands the cell phone to the very much younger woman in the seat next to her, saying “Call your people”. An elderly woman on another cell phone calmly gives the location and combination of the home safe with her will in it, a married couple clinging to each other as the aircraft pitches violently— whatever happens at the last, they will be together.
And so it ends, as everyone who was paying attention that awful day would know, in rural green and golden fields— seen from the cockpit, growing horrifyingly more distinct, and a handful of passengers battering down the cockpit door with a catering cart. United 93 ends in a black screen and sudden silence, and then I realized how the tension had been ratcheted up to an almost unbearable degree. My heartbeat was hammering as if I had just done a 5 mile run with the Weevil, and the theater was entirely silent. No, this is not a movie you could be said to enjoy… but it is a movie with something to say… which is that when Americans die, and they are given sufficient warning, a fair percentage of them will choose to go down fighting.

(Which is, I hope, the message that Osama Bin Laden will take, when someone sends him a DVD of United 93, to whatever his current hiding place is. We’ve got your message, Wierdy-Beardy-Boy, and the answer is—no sale.)

10. April 2006 · Comments Off on Currently Watching 04/10/06: · Categories: Technology, That's Entertainment!

Tron (1982), on the SciFi channel. Considering how lame this show was branded, when it was made, it is amazing how well it’s held up. Actually, it seems far more prescient today than it did then. Singularity, anyone?

Update: How interesting that they followed this up with The Twilight Zone: A World Of Difference (1960).

09. April 2006 · Comments Off on Entertainment Trivia For 04/09/06 · Categories: Fun and Games, That's Entertainment!

OK, here’s one in honor of Hef’s 80th birthday:

She was Playboy magazine’s first cover girl. For this, she made $____ .

07. April 2006 · Comments Off on This Is Worth Watching · Categories: History, That's Entertainment!

I’m currently watching Bible Battles, on the History Channel, which treats the OT books dealing with the rise of the Israelites (Exodus, Numbers, Joshua, Judges, etc.) as military treatise. It first aired last December.

Whatever your religious convictions, this is well worth a watch. While it seems to rely upon only a few expert sources, it doesn’t go too far from Biblical legend – the greatest departure likely being another possible debunk of the absurd and embattled notion that Joshua blew his horn, and the walls of Jericho came tumbling down.

06. April 2006 · Comments Off on Albeit Disgusting, I Guess This Had To Be · Categories: That's Entertainment!

Guys Gone Wild

But, isn’t the $18-26 price more than the Girls Gone Wild videos?

05. April 2006 · Comments Off on Entertainment Trivia For 04/04/06 · Categories: Fun and Games, That's Entertainment!

This recurring co-star on King of the Hill also co-starred in this film, with Pat Boone and Ann-Margret.

Extra Credit: Before assuming the “signature role” for which we know him/her today, what character was our star famous for?

Hint: As reader Bill correctly guessed, it isn’t Willie Nelson. Nor is it Ann Richards, or even Chuck Mangione. But our star is, by far, the biggest ever on KotH.

Congratz! to reader Bill!

I would have thought that, after our own dear Mary (A Proud Veteran) got the REALLY obscure 1962 José Ferrer remake of the 1945 Walter Lang classic, the rest would be a cinch. But I guess not…

Well, unlike the original, which, like the 1932 Philip Duffield Stong book upon which it was based, is set in Iowa, the 1962 remake is set in Texas. Hummmm… “Texas State Fair”… Does that ring some bells? What is the first thing one sees upon entering the Texas State Fair?

Still blank? Well, of course, it’s Big Tex!

Big Tex 2002

As for the “Extra Credit” part, I didn’t even know it myself, until I uncovered the reference above. But it seems, in a former life, Big Tex was Santa Claus!

Extra-Extra Credit! (After admonishing me that Big Tex isn’t the VERY first thing one sees upon entering) Reader homebru asks, what other major motion picture features the Texas State Fair?

Extra-Extra Credit Answer: I guessed it! *happy dance* (see comments)

02. April 2006 · Comments Off on It’s Got a Good Beat, You Can Dance to It · Categories: Ain't That America?, Politics, That's Entertainment!

Bush Was Right!

Via The Headmistress.

31. March 2006 · Comments Off on Entertainment Trivia For 03/27/06 · Categories: Fun and Games, That's Entertainment!

I haven’t done any soap opera trivia yet, so here’s a two-parter for you soap fans:

First, what was the tie-in between Dallas and Knots Landing? And second, what was Dallas’ incest angle?

The Answer! Well, perhaps it’s a tribute to the intelligence of our readers (or a condemnation of mine), but it seems we have NO soap fans here. Anyway, if there was any interest in this question at all, I might do some research, and make sure I have the exact seasons. But, as it stands, I’ll just go on memory, and we can inter this matter in the shallow grave where it belongs:

In Dallas, season 2, we were introduced to Jock Ewing’s “other” son, “Gary”, who happened to be the hitherto mysterious father of niece “Lucy”, who had been living at the Southfork Ranch from episode 1. Gary married “Val”, and moved to Knots Landing AKA “The Cul-de-Sac”, a hard-against-the-coast suburban community of Los Angeles – most likely in Rancho Pales Verdes, Pacific Palisades, or Malibu, and flagrant decadence ensues. (Sound familiar, Desperate Housewives fans?)

Well anyway, in Dallas season 1, Lucy had an affair with senior ranch hand, “Ray Krebbs”. But, around about season eight, we learned that Ray was actually Jock’s bastard son, a half-brother to J.R., Bobby and Gary.

However, it is popularly believed that this was just a matter of the writers losing track of the story arc. Either that, or they drew back, in response to popular revulsion. In any event, the incest angle between Lucy and Ray was never dealt with

Update: “With some embarrassment,” reader Quintus informs us that it was actually season four when it was revealed that Ray was Jock’s son (see comments).

29. March 2006 · Comments Off on “Army Of Davids” Theory Jumps The Shark · Categories: Technology, That's Entertainment!

In most cases, I have been a supporter of Glenn Reynolds’ Army of Davids theory. But, in this TCS Daily article, he has simply taken it too far.

Having done some stand-up comedy, I know something of this. C’mon Glenn: The Lazy Muncie video you site names several (not necessarily comedy) “luminaries” who hail from there. Drew Carey is from Cleveland, Roseanne Barr is from Salt Lake City, Jeff Foxworthy is from Atlanta and Johnny Carson was from Norfolk, Nebraska. All cut their teeth in local clubs before making it big. This has been true from the days of burlesque, and likely before.

In the world of comedy, the Internet is another channel of distribution, not a revolution. In a way, it may be counter-productive, as it will allow everyone with some talent, but no refinement, to “perform” for a relatively elite audience, without the instant critique which comes from “killing” or “bombing”. Again, Lazy Muncie is a great example of this; it shows lots of promise, but really is neither extremely funny, or seminal. But, as long just about every town and hamlet across the nation has a little club with an open mike night, flyover country will still be the great crucible of American comedy.

Update: After doing some background on on our two Lazy Muncie protagonists, Kerby Heyborne and Chris Cox (not to be confused with our new SEC Chairman), disabuses one of any conception of it as some sort of “Cinderella story”. Muncie native Cox has been making his way up the writer/producer ladder here in SoCal for about 11 years. Heyborne is newer to SoCal, but spent years busting his chops on the “Mormon Theater” circuit in Utah. In neither case can you call Lazy Muncie their “big break”, as they both are part of Fox’s new sit-com Free Ride (Cox as Supervising Producer, Heyborne in the part of “Dillon”).

28. March 2006 · Comments Off on New SuperCuts Commercial · Categories: Memoir, Military, That's Entertainment!

ROTFL A new SuperCuts commercial typifies their competitors with this haircutting automoton saying (in a mechanical voice) “how about a number 2… number 2… number 2…” This has got to be a crack-up, at least to guys who served in my day. The “number 2”, named for the clipper guard they put on just before they shear you like a sheep, leaves you with about as much hair as a “Pinger”, right out of Basic.

27. March 2006 · Comments Off on If You Are Not Watching Dark Kingdom: The Dragon King · Categories: That's Entertainment!

…On the SciFi channel, what could you be thinking? Thusfar, it’s been pretty excellent TV.

Update: Our Brit readers will know this by Sword of Xanten. And here’s the IMdB rundown. The reviews are quite mixed. I think a lot of it has to do with some reviewers holding it up to Peter Jackson’s Lord of the Rings trilogy. I don’t think that’s a fair comparison, as this was obviously done for a fraction of LotR’s budget.

26. March 2006 · Comments Off on V for Vendetta · Categories: That's Entertainment!

Great movie. A good time was had by all. Fun special effects. Really great performances. Action, paranoia, intrigue, plot twists, characters with depth that grow through the story. We liked it.

I understand the “R” rating but Boyo was more concerned about the faces in the crowd at the end than he was about any of the violence or gore.

The politics of the movie? Okay look. If my government ever gets as batshit crazy as the one shown in this movie, yeah, I’d say it’s time for a revolution. Until then, I’ll leave the Guy Fawkes mask for Halloween. On the other hand, if you take offense at the way the U.S. is depicted in this film…ummmm, if none of it is true, why does it bother you? (I say that to my 10 year old when he’s mad about someone calling him names.) Be you wingnut or moonbat, repeat after me: It’s only a movie.

I really like the ambiguity of the ending. The faces in the crowd could mean a variety of things and I think that’s a good thing. Made for some good after movie discussion over coffee with friends.

One of the better movies we’ve seen in a long time.