10. February 2005 · Comments Off on What A Ride! · Categories: General

Yesterday I was coming back from my monthly dr. appt in Macon, about 100 miles up the road. Weather was BAD, heavy rain, low ceilings, so I was in the old chevvy van instead of the Cherokee. I admit I was going too fast for those condx, but I was on autopilot – cruise control, so things seemed OK. Then all of a sudden I turned into a passenger instead of a driver! I was going down the highway one instant, and the next I was in the median, doing 80 mph, mud flying everywhere and absolutely no control.

I was surprisingly calm, no fear, just looking ahead and saying, “we’re gonna go over,” as the missile started to tilt to the left. I thought, “Darn, I took off my seatbelt because I had to pee so bad, this ain’t gonna be pretty. ” Then it started heading for the side with opposing traffic, I thought I had to stop that, so I was doing everything I could to steer back across. Then I got sideways, still sliding pretty fast. Again, I said “I’m going over”, and tried to brace for being thrown all over the place, but somehow the van careened back on the roadway. We’re not done yet. It kept on hydroplaning and then snatched up on pavement, shooting me BACK into the median, still somewhere around 60 mph. Here I was, sideways, and I could see a culvert coming up. “Uh-oh, this is it, I’m goin’ over for sure this time.” Nope, somehow I got it back in the left side breakdown lane, pointed the right way, and regained steering control. I eased it onto the road, went to the right lane, slowed to 45, got my thoughts under control, and snapped my seatbelt. Now I needed to do more than pee. I saw a sign for my exit, got off, and the rest is history. Wow, that happened so fast, but it seemed in slow motion, I was able to think and plan, even if it did no good. I just went out and looked, and there’s grass under my van from one end to the other. Man, that was some ride, and I don’t want to repeat it!

I guess my angel was there and not yet ready to take me home. Anyway, it ended well, I guess. I still want to know what Heaven looks like, guess I’ll have to wait…..

Peace, friends

Joe

10. February 2005 · Comments Off on Warm, Breathing & Avant-Garde · Categories: Ain't That America?, General

Since everyone else in the blogosphere has taken a couple of manly thwacks at the academic carcass of Ward Churchill, the dunce of the University of Colorado ethnic studies department, I didn’t think there was a need for moi to pile on… but what the hell. I’ve got the bile and the energy left over from ripping Eason Jordan, a far more suitable target. I can always make the time to mock a guy who looks like the late Susan Sontag in bad drag, anyway. Professor Churchill is just the lagniappe, the dessert truffle… and besides, they had a story about him on NPR Morning edition this morning. Someone over there must have learned how to do a google search, and skim Instapundit, so there may be hope for them still. The story left out all the amusing stuff— the faux-Indian pretensions, the Che-revolutionary posing, the crack-pot political theorizing and the extremely dubious scholarship— and simply dealt with it as a matter of academic freedom. In other words, the right of academia to traffic in unpopular ideas without having your ass canned with extreme prejudice and a couple of burly campus security officers.

Well, it certainly doesn’t get much more unpopular, idea-wise, than suggesting that people who worked in the Twin Towers were all functionaries of a Nazi state, that they were all “little Eichmans” and richly deserved to die by fire, fall or collapsing building. I am sure if he really worked at it, he could have thought up something much more richly insulting, more hurtful, more calculated to outrage the taxpayers of the state of Colorado who (for some bizarre reason!) provide him with an insanely generous paycheck… but.

Oh, yes, the big “But”…. NPR was right; academic freedom means putting up with stuff you don’t agree with. In fact, there ought to be more of it; a lot of people on college campuses everywhere ought to be hearing a lot more of stuff they don’t agree with, but that’s a rant for another occasion. Getting back to the good Professor, though— there is a better reason to keep him. Given the sort of poseur he appears to be, he would milk being fired for even more. Oh, yeah, make me a martyr to the altar of academic freedom, baby! Crushed under the wheels of the fascistic state for the crime of speaking truth to power! I can already hear the interview on NPR, with Juan Williams going all gooey and wobbly-voiced over how poor, poor Professor Churchill was savaged, savaged by the mob of reactionary right-wing death beasts. I have a low nausea threshold, and would prefer not to barf up my morning cup of tea with milk, one tsp sugar, and slice of wheat toast with honey, so I think they should keep him. After all, they hired him, on what looks like very thin qualifications; warm, breathing and theatrically avant-garde. Figuring out who exactly approved him for tenure, and why would provide another vein of rich amusement.

And that brings me to the main reason I think they should keep him; for the sheer amusement value. Professor Churchill has inestimable value as the bulls-eye for metaphoric target practice; chained to the academic stocks as it were, focus for scorn, derision, for deconstruction of his fraudulent scholarship, vilely insulting writings and speeches, his questionable status as a “native American”, extremely thin academic qualifications, bullying demeanor, and general fuckwittedness. There is just so much good materiel to work with; we could go on laughing at him for years, picking him up in the intervals between bigger and more transient matters for a little more thrashing, much like my cats derive hours of amusement and exercise from batting around palmetto bugs. I’d rather go back and thrash him every one in a while for practice, than have him all over the media being a martyr.
Besides, I have the feeling that being laughed at, long and heartily is a far, far more subtle and lingering torment. What say you all?

09. February 2005 · Comments Off on Eeeeeek – I Must Be Getting Old! · Categories: General

Am I a step or two behind the times because I was totally unfamiliar with Caesar’s Palace’s Jerk It Out before I heard it on the iPod Shuffle commercial?

09. February 2005 · Comments Off on Memo: CNN—The Most Busted Name in News · Categories: General, Media Matters Not

From: Sgt Mom
To: Mr. E. Jordan, and his legacy media enablers
Re: The game is afoot!

1. I wholeheartedly believe that responsible news reporting requires that its’ practitioners remain loitering with meaningful intent in the vicinity of verifiable facts. However, I have been informed that such a such an innocent belief may pose an impossibly high standard and handicap, and unfit me to participate in “journalism” such as it is practiced by luminaries such as Sy Hersh, Dan Rather, Peter Arnett, Jason Blair, and Mr. Eason Jordan’s very prominent network.

2. Standards have indeed fallen appallingly low when the so-called top-tier, credible news outlets compete in the fraud and fantasy stakes with the kind of tabloids who run pictures of faces on Mars, movie-stars’ weight and addiction problems and bogus miracles. I would not be surprised to see “60 Minutes” doing an expose of Michael Jackson as a space alien… oops, that was already done, wasn’t it?

3. In this particular instance, the problem is not in the story as published; it is the spectacle of Mr. Jordan making an astonishing accusation, accusing the American military in Iraq of deliberately targeting and killing a number of reporters, during a panel discussion at the World Economic Forum at Davos last month. If true and can be proven, this comes very close to being a war crime, and it would be Mr. Jordan’s responsibility as a citizen to share the particulars— who, where, when— with the proper authorities. At the very least, this would merit the same exhaustive news coverage as the ever-floggable dead horse of Abu Graib. Yet Mr. Jordan seems to have been as least as circumspect here, as he was concerning atrocities perpetrated by Saddam Hussein’s regime during the time that CNN gloried in having a bureau in Baghdad.

4. The alternative is that the accusation is false and made to score casual points with a portion of the audience at an open forum amongst the powerful and well-connected… this is even more appalling for the news profession. To perpetrate an outright lie, an untruth, to bear false witness goes beyond violating the standards of journalism. It is contrary to standards of ethical human behavior; it is wicked and wrong. We would not tolerate this in our children, our personal physician, our spouse, our structural engineers, or our subordinates, and will for damn sure not tolerate of our news media. Lamentably, a certain degree of elasticity with the truth is something we have come to expect, or at least factor in to our dealings with politicians, used car dealers, producers of television commercials, or the cretins who send us e-mails promising enlargement of body parts or transfers of improbably large sums of money from the descendents of deceased Nigerian functionaries. At this rate of depreciated credibility, many of the formerly respectable news organizations, such as CNN and CBS, AP and Reuters, will be shortly be at about that level. Or possibly a little below, given the current conditions.

5. This matter will not be made to go away, either. The tape made of the session must be released to the public, and Mr. Jordan’s allegation must be investigated, thoroughly, and completely. If, as I confidently expect, it is found to be baseless, then Mr. Jordan should— among other things— reminded rather forcibly of the penalties for slander.

6. Should this issue not be aired as it should be in the larger media— as the Deity is my witness, I shall laugh uproariously and throw popcorn at the television, the very next time I see some pompous blow-dried media drone standing in front of a corporate HQ or government office intoning piously about the public’s right to know.

Sincerely, and hoping you will take this communication to heart
Sgt. Mom

09. February 2005 · Comments Off on Executive Headhunters In A Feeding Frenzy · Categories: General

The hottest topic today, for the business world’s chattering classes, is the resignation of HP‘s Carly Fiorina. Chief among the subtopics is the matter of, “who will replace her?” And the headhunters are working overtime:

According to a recent survey conducted by Executive Development Associates (EDA), a San Francisco-based executive development firm, General Electric (nyse: GE – news – people ) ranks as the best company for developing talent and is one of the more frequently poached companies for that reason.

IBM (nyse: IBM – news – people ) came in at number three in the survey. Indeed, many senior executives at IBM have left to pursue CEO careers elsewhere. In the past several years John Swainson left for Computer Associates (nyse: CA – news – people ), Mike Lawrie left for Siebel Systems (nasdaq: SEBL – news – people ), James Vanderslice left for the vice chairman job at Dell and John Thompson left for Symantec (nasdaq: SYMC – news – people ).

Other companies that rank high in executive development, where HP could look to fill its vacancy, include Dell (nasdaq: DELL – news – people ), which just lost vice president Robert Davis to the CFO job at CA, Johnson & Johnson (nyse: JNJ – news – people ), Weyerhaeuser (nyse: WY – news – people ), Procter and Gamble (nyse: PG – news – people ), PepsiCo (nyse: PEP – news – people ), UBS (nyse: UBS – news – people ) and Cisco Systems (nasdaq: CSCO – news – people ).

I find it interesting that I don’t see 3M mentioned. But it should be of interest to everyone that HP doesn’t seem to be considering a promotion from within at all. [incorrect, see comments] This is likely because they so missteped with Carly. She was quite the phenom earlier in her career, but became another example of the Peter Principle as CEO.

08. February 2005 · Comments Off on A Meme Rolls On · Categories: General

Via Michele who got it from Jim who got it from Ken, who in turn got it from Army of Mom who seems to have gotten it from Seven Inches of Sense.

10 albums randomly selected from my collection:

Anywhere But Home – Evanescence
Money For Nothing – Dire Straits
Song(s) You Know By Heart – Jimmy Buffet
Live at the Greek – Jimmy Page and The Black Crowes
The White Room – The KLF (Also known as the Justified Ancients of MuMu, further known as the JAMMs)
101 – Depeche Mode
Live in New York – Blondie
Live from House of Blues – The Blues Brothers and Friends
Live at the Beacon – The New York Rock and Soul Review
The Last Waltz – The Band

What is the total amount of music files on your computer?

I’m not going to count megs or gigs but about 70 Albums and about 30 “orphan” tracks.

The last CD you bought is:

The Best of Bob Seger. “Roll Me Away” never got enough credit as it’s own track.

What is the song you last listened to before this message?

Bizarre Love Triangle – Frentel- via Radio Paradise.


Five songs you often listen to or that mean a lot to you:

It’s Hard to Be a Saint in the City – Bruce Springsteen…Because it is.

Oliver’s Army – Elvis Costello

Wonderful Tonight – Eric Clapton…It’s the song Beautiful Wife and I love to slow dance to.

The Weight – The Band with The Staple Singers…When Mavis kicks in on the second verse…it’s better than any church for my soul.

Over You – Roxy Music…For a mime named Lisa…who got away…thankfully…but all the same…

Who are you gonna pass this stick to?

I’d like to see all y’alls own versions, either in comments or your own post.

08. February 2005 · Comments Off on Ethical Question: · Categories: General

Should I go back to work when I’m feeling 100 percent or should I milk the convalescent leave for all its worth?

08. February 2005 · Comments Off on The Cool Thing… · Categories: General, Technology

about corrective surgery is that as the incisions heal you realize that the pain you started with is gone and as the pain from the wounds fade, your legs are better than before the surgery. But now I’ve got 8 days of itchy staples to deal with and if I don’t go mad, I don’t know why.

07. February 2005 · Comments Off on Country Roads and “Confiture Bar le Duc” · Categories: General, History

We drove across the border on a Sunday, my daughter and I, on a mild autumn day that began by being veiled in fog when I gassed up the VEV at the PX gas station at Bitburg, and headed southwest assisted by the invaluable Hallwag drivers’ atlas, open on the passenger seat beside me. Blondie shared the back seat with a basket of books, a pillow, some soft luggage stuffed into the space between the seats, and half a dozen Asterix and Obelix comic books. Fortunate child, she could read in the back seat of a moving car for hours. Not like me— child or adult, I could not even look at the printed word while underway without becoming nauseated.

“We’ll cross right over Luxemburg, and then we’ll be in France,” I said. “You know, Gaul.”
“Will there be indomitable Gauls?” my daughter asked, seriously. She was just coming up to five years old. Her favorite comic books followed the adventures of the bold Gaulish warrior Asterix, and his friend, the menhir-deliveryman Oblelix, whose tiny village was the last to hold out against the imperial might of Roman conquest, thanks to a magic potion worked up by the druid Getafix, which gave superhuman strength to all the village warriors. The drawings in the books were artistically literate, and there were all sorts of puns and word-plays in the stories – and they had been translated and distributed all over.
“There could be,” I said, noncommittally. Three or four weeks ago, we had left the apartment in the suburb of Athens where we had lived for most of what she could remember of life and taken the car ferry from Patras to Brindisi, on our way to my new assignment in Spain.

In easy stages I had driven the length of Italy, over the Brenner Pass, through the tiny neck of Austria, and across Southern Germany. We had so far stayed in a castle on the Rhine, a couple of guesthouses, a hotel outside Siena which could have been nearly anywhere, as it overlooked a junkyard on one side, and acres of grapevines on the other three, and another which covered two floors on the top of an office block in Florence and offered a view of the Duomo from the terrace. We had been to see ruins in Pompeii, the Sistine chapel, the wondrous Byzantine mosaics in Ravenna, a Nazi concentration camp, and a mineral bath in Baden-Baden.

“Where are we going to do first?”
“Buy some jam,” I said.
“What kind of jam?” my daughter asked.
“It’s very superior jam, made with currents. They pick out the seeds by hand with a goose-quill, so it’s very expensive and only made in this one little town in France, but it is supposed to be the tastiest on earth. It’s on the way between here and Paris.”
Well, it wasn’t any odder than anything else I had taken her to see in the time that we had lived in Europe. She curled up with Asterix, while the VEV’s tires hummed tirelessly down the road.

I could tell, without having to see a border sign, when we had left Germany. Germany was as clean as if Granny Dodie had dusted it all, and scoured it twice with Lysol, and then groomed all the grass and trees with a pair of manicure scissors. Houses and cottages were all trim and immaculate, not a sagging roof or a broken shutter to be seen – and then, we were in another place, where slacker standards prevailed. Not absolute rural blight, just everything a little grimier, a little more overgrown, not so aggressively, compulsively tidy. And the highway became a toll road, and a rather expensive one at that. I made a snap decision to take the rural, surface roads at that point, and the toll-taker indulgently wrote out a list for me of the towns along the way of the road I wanted, hop-scotching from town to town, along a two-lane road among rolling hills and dark green scrub-forest, and little collections of houses around a square, or a traffic circle labeled ‘centre’ around which I would spin until I saw a signpost with the name of the next town, and the VEV ricocheted out of the roundabout, and plunged headlong down this new road. (Good heavens, a signpost that way for Malmedy! Well, they did say snottily in Europe that wars were a means to teach Americans about geography, but I was interested this day in the earlier war, and my route led south.)

Always two lanes, little traveled on a Sunday it seemed. I had no shred of confidence in my ability to pronounce French without mangling every syllable, but at least I could read signs in Latinate alphabets. And this was Alsace-Lorraine, I was sunnily confident of being able to make myself clear in German, if required. The VEV’s tank was still better than half full, and it was only midday. Here we were climbing a long steady slope, a wooded table-land, and a break in the trees, where a great stone finger pointed accusingly at an overcast sky. A signpost with several arrows pointed the various ways farther on – OssuaireFt. DouaumontFleury. A parking lot with a scattering of cars, the same oppressive sense of silence I had felt in places like Pompeii, and Dachau, as if even the birds and insects were muffled.
“What’s this place?” My daughter emerged from the back seat, yawning.
“There was a horrendous battle here, sixty years ago. The Germans tried to take it, but the French held on.”
“Indomitable Gauls,” My daughter said wisely, and I pointed up at the Ossuary,
“That place is full of their bones. We’ll go see the museum, first.”

This was the place of which the stalwart Joffe had commanded, “They shall not pass,” the place in which it could be claimed— over any other World War I battlefield— that France bled out as a significant military power. For ten months in 1916 Germany and France battered each other into immobility, pouring men and materiel into the Verdun Salient with prodigal hands, churning every inch of soil with shellfire and poison gas, splintering the woods and little towns, gutting a whole generation of the men who would have been it�s solid middle-class, the politicians and patriots, leaders who might have forestalled the next war, or stood fast in 1940. It was the historian Barbara Tuchman who noted that the entire 1914 graduating class of St. Cyr, the French approximation of West Point had been killed within the first month of war. For this was a wasteful war, as if the great generals all stood around saying “Well, that didn’t work very well, did it?— so let’s do it again, and again and again, until it does indeed work.” And afterwards, no one could very well say what it had all been for, and certainly not that it had been worth it, only that the place was a mass grave for a million men.

There was the usual little sign at the admittance desk to the museum— so many francs, but students and small children were admitted free, and so were war veterans and members of the military. I got out my military ID, and politely showed it to the concierge, a gentleman who looked nearly old enough to have been a veteran of Verdun saying
“Ici militaire…”
He looked at me, at the card, at my tits, and at my daughter, and then at the card again, and laughed, jovially waving me on to the exhibits; models and bits of battered gear, mostly, and a bit in the cellar made up to look like a corner of the battlefield, hell in a very small place, all the ground stirred up again and again. Supposedly, they had despaired of ever planting a straight row of trees; there was so much stuff in the ground.
When we came out again, the clouds were lifting a bit … down and across the river there was a golden haze over the town.

“Are we going to buy jam now?” my daughter asked.
“When we get to Bar le Duc. I think we’ll get something to eat, and stay the night there,” I said, and in that golden afternoon, I followed the two-lane road, the Voie Sacree, the only road into Verdun from the railhead at Bar le Duc, where traffic never stopped during the battle, two hundred trucks an hour, and 8,000 men shoveling gravel under their wheels day and night. The only visible mark left along the road were square white-washed mile markers, topped with a metal replica of a poilu’s helmet, like grave markers for a France gone sixty years ago.

I bought six jars of the confiture, six tiny jars of preserve as bright as blood, filled with tiny globes of clear red fruit. It was exquisite; saved for special occasions; I made them last for nearly a decade.

07. February 2005 · Comments Off on Superficial Diversity At Universities · Categories: General

Stephen Bainbridge comments on facilty diversity at UCLA:

I just received a 206 page book from the UCLA Associate Vice Chancellor for Faculty Diversity (I had no idea we even had such a person), which provides a department by department breakdown of racial, ethnic, and gender diversity. The breakdown includes not only raw data, but also an estimate of “underutilization,” which is defined as the “difference between actual number of faculty [in a particular department] of a particular group [i.e. race or gender] and the expected number of faculty based on the availability estimate [i.e., the estimated number of potential faculty hires of that race or gender in that field nationally].”

The data are also available on line.

I’m not sure what I’m supposed to do with this book, since Prop 209 presumably bars me from making use of such data in voting on hiring decisions. In any case, I note that there is no data on forms of diversity other than race and gender, such as intellectual or political diversity. No surprise there. My guess is that the highest underutilization number would be for pro-life female Republicans of all ethnicities.

TPTB at California’s universities have been livid over Prop. 209, and have been doing everything in their power to circumvent it. I’m sure faculities in Ohio are equally chagrined over this legislation:

(G) Faculty and instructors shall be hired, fired, promoted, and granted tenure on the basis of their competence and appropriate knowledge in their field of expertise and shall not be hired, fired, promoted, granted tenure, or denied promotion or tenure on the basis of their political, ideological, or religious beliefs.

Hat Tip: InstaPundit

07. February 2005 · Comments Off on 7 Days and Counting: Eason Jordan · Categories: General

Time to put on the pajamas, and get to work. Eason Jordan’s apparent slander against the the US military is not going unremarked. More here.

If we’re going for the blog-swarm, can we take down Sy Hersh as well? Just asking.

07. February 2005 · Comments Off on Robot Warriors · Categories: General

When stories about battlefield robots move from the technical and military journals to the business pages, you know real-life application is right on the horizon. I give you this from Forbes:

And although none are able to fire weapons on their own, automated or remote-controlled machines are sniffing out mines, defusing explosives and watching for signs of danger. Soon some of them will also be carrying weapons. In 2005, autonomous planes alone could represent a $2 billion market, according to the Steve Zaloga, an analyst at The Teal Group. Roboticists, who have long toiled mainly in academia, are eager to see their creations put to use. And companies such as Lockheed Martin (nyse: LMT – news – people ) and Boeing (nyse: BA – news – people ) are trying to roll out products quickly.

“This technology has been in the research lab way, way, way too long,” says Helen Greiner, chief executive of Cambridge, Mass.-based iRobot. Her company makes the Roomba, a robot vacuum cleaner, but it has also already developed two robots for the battlefield.

“This isn’t fantasy, and it’s not cartoons,” says Don Nimblett, manager of business development for unmanned systems at Lockheed. “We’ve really done this stuff.”

I believe a brigade of robotic sentries would have been quite handy in Iraq, to safeguard weapons caches and surrendered troops, left behind in the rush to Baghdad.

05. February 2005 · Comments Off on Uncharted Territory In License Plate Land · Categories: General, Politics

Fresh on the heels of the “Choose Life” license plate to-do, we now have the State of Virginia moving towards creating a “Traditional Marriage” license plate:

The Washington Times’ Christina Bellantoni reported that “Delegate Robert H. Brink said the marriage plate bordered on ‘uncharted territory in license plate land’ and does a ‘grave disservice’ to marriage.

“’Putting marriage in the same class as license plates for Holstein cows, Parrotheads and Harley-Davidson owners … cheapens and trivializes marriage,’ the Arlington Democrat said. ‘Using marriage as a political football is just wrong and that’s what we’re doing today.’”

I have heard many say that the government shouldn’t be involved in producing political messages – I agree.

But here’s something I haven’t heard yet: Why should government have a monopoly on the production of license plates? Stickers showing that fees have been paid is one thing; but why the entire plate? States should produce specifications (the “three-Fs”; form, fit, function) for acceptable plates, which I’m sure they all have as internal documents. And they should issue the number that is to be put on the plate. Then, the vehicle owner should be free to purchase the actual plates themselves from whomever they wish.

Then, if some yahoo wants a plate that says “Proud Member of NAMBLA“, it’s none of the government’s business.

04. February 2005 · Comments Off on All Good · Categories: General

Surgery went as planned. That’s a weird experience…having them shoot a little shot in your IV and going, “Whoa…that’s fun…” and then waking up a couple hours later remembering nothing at all.

Incisions are about 15cm up both legs with an “H” style release across the fascias. The surgeon took one look at my legs and decided both compartments needed doing. I guess I have unusually large calf muscles because everyone kept commenting on them…sort of creeped me out. No…my physical therapist was not there.

Must go put the legs back up now…I was only mobile to ummm…take care of unignorable bodily maintenance.

Thanks for the prayers all, I’m sure they helped.

Percocet-land is a nice place to visit, but I wouldn’t want to live here.

03. February 2005 · Comments Off on Here’s An Idea… · Categories: General

Why not actually give those Treasury Bonds, which are supposedly purchased by the Social Security Trust Fund, to those who pay in?

Seems like a simple compromise to me.

03. February 2005 · Comments Off on Dances with the Media – Or Bend Over, Here It Comes Again · Categories: General, Media Matters Not

When I worked in the Mather AFB Public Affairs office, I used to marvel at how resolute the Media Relations people were able to be, in the face of always imminent disaster when it came to dealing with the press, especially the Sacramento Bee reporter who specialized in military affairs, and was naturally convinced that he was the next Woodward and Bernstein. This gentleman or �Mr. T-B� seemed to believe that Mather AFB somehow harbored his very own Watergate scoop, which would bring him everlasting renown and showers of journalistic glory�if only he could hector the Public Affairs staff into admitting it. Or, failing that, leaping to the conclusion in print which put the base and the Air Force in as bad a light as possible.

Nothing the Major told � Mr. T-B� ever seemed to make a difference when the final story was published, no matter how polite, prompt and thoroughly his almost always preemptory queries were answered, Public Affairs was screwed, from the moment the phone rang. Just answering the insistently ringing phone, and telling the Major, or his second-in-command, Captain F— that �Mr. T-B� was on the line to speak to them was to see that either of them already had a rotten day, to know they were already thinking �Bend over, here it comes again!� while their lips formed the silent words �Aww�f**k!�� As they picked up the extension to actually say, �Good morning� what can we do for you today?� in a cheerful and professional voice, we all knew we were already lost.

Even Captain F—, a statuesque blond who looked like one of the minor Valkyries had only slightly better luck with �Mr. T-B�— and she was especially adept at the fine art of media handling. Watching her cope with a hostile media inquiry was like watching someone tap-dancing on a high-wire while juggling two flaming torches and a hand grenade— a dazzling display of dexterity, control and grace under pressure. Mr. T-B was probably not insensitive to the fact that his telephone calls were about as welcome to us as a case of the intestinal flu. He accused me of lying about the Major being at lunch; when he called one day, and everyone was out, save for myself and the senior civilian.
�He told you to say that, didn�t he?� Mr. T-B snarled, �You�re covering for him, aren�t you?�
�It�s eleven-thirty,� I said, rather stunned about being accused of lying over such a little matter. �Everyone�s at lunch.� Out of desperation, I gave the call to the senior civilian, a retired Army WO� and of course the first thing Mr. T-B wanted to verify was that the Major really was at lunch.

No, he was hands-down our most un-favorite person in the locality, especially after the front page story in the Sac Bee about the two little old ladies in an orange coupe. Owing to an unfortunate confluence of events, initiated when they blundered in the back gate, the two old ladies in coupe managed to get thoroughly got lost on base. In panic, disorientation and hysteria, they wound up speeding down the runway towards the SAC alert ramp, hotly pursued by a posse of armed Security Police troops, as they were heading into� umm� one of the places on base that was defended by deadly force and then some. The SPS had realized immediately what was happening; their commander later applauded them for good sense and restraint, but the ladies damn-near had heart attacks.

It made a very funny story and it percolated around the base for a month or two, by the time Mr. T-B snooped it out, and called the Public Affairs office to verify� which we did. The cartoon comic sketch of the whole scene that ran with the story was a low blow� but heck. It was a funny story, and we lived it down. The following year when a Buff crashed on takeoff in a muddy field nearby, and a senior officer at a tenant unit was accused of molesting children, I imagine the Public Affairs staff looked back nostalgically on the little old ladies in the orange coupe, barreling down the alert-area ramp.
It put things into perspective, though— the press had their job, and we had ours� and no matter how hard we worked to put a favorable image of the Air Force into it, the reporter was perfectly free to blow us off. To his credit, Mr. �T-B� did apologize, sort of, for the cartoon sketch. It was, he claimed, his editor�s idea. Just doing his job— and it was true. It really did happen.

I googled Mr. �T-B� before I wrote this, and he had a byline a couple of years ago, writing up an obit for the Sacramento Bee, so I don�t suppose he ever hit the pay dirt, his Watergate scoop, his entr�e into the big leagues. He just might have been too much of an old-fashioned gentleman for the so-called big leagues of journalism. Whatever else we might have thought of him in the Public Affairs office, he didn�t make s**t up, and he always called to verify facts. And if the facts were against him, he dropped the story. All this would seem to disqualify �Mr. T-B� for the practice of journalism in the style of Dan Rather, of Sy Hersh, and Eason Jordan, where bearing false witness, in promoting blatant and absolutely debunkable falsehoods is the order of the day.

They seem to have sold their souls for a byline, for a bit of fame and limelight, to stand in front of an appreciative crowd, telling that crowd what they want to hear. It must be a heady thing to stand before an approving audience, not realizing how stories of massacres, and targeting of journalists in Iraq by American military is taken as an offence, an offence against the honor of those Jacksonians who hold the values of �Duty, Honor, Country� in high regard, who may not be in the audience, but are listening now. Such people do not take well to being slandered, most especially by the press. We hear you, Eason Jordan. We hear you very well, and we know what you are. Writing obits for the Sacramento Bee might start to look very good to you as a career move by the time you have finished hearing from us.

02. February 2005 · Comments Off on A Great Speech, And More Observations · Categories: General

I haven’t posted many blogs lately, what with lying all trussed up in ICU, and to top it all off, Nurse Jenny underwent surgery this past monday for a right shoulder rotator cup repair. I’m taking care of her at home this week, and she’s just a little limited in what she can do. But, thank God, she did well in the surgery and is doing just fine at home.

Timmer is just about to go under the knife on his legs, a really daunting procedure, and we wish him well and a very speedy recovery. Hang in there, Timmer, you have a family of bloggers out here who care about you, and we’re all on your side, pulling for your speedy and complete recovery. Your family out here is with you tonight.

The President just finished his SOTU address, and as predicted, the dummocrats showed their a$$es with disrespect for the president, even booing him at some points. Ken Salazar from Colorado is calling the speech “divisive”, just what the dummocrats are expected by party line to express. I thought it was a fine speech, and there were some instances of emotion that I was unprepared for – such as the tribute to the Iraqi woman standing with Laura Bush. The tribute to the fallen Marine whose parents were there really got to me, as it obviously did to many more. I did tear up, and choked up as well, telling Nurse Jenny that I’d give anything to be young enough to go back on AD. She said that I’d done my part, but I just wish so deeply that I could do more. I guess that’s a common feeling among those of us who served in an earlier era.

Folks, I hope the American People get behind the President, and that we see a coming together of our people that hasn’t been seen for a lot of years. There’s a lot we can do t0 honor our fallen heroes, and to bring our society into a new direction and a track of hope and victory in the future to come. We here on sgtstryker can help get this underway, and I hope we continue to be a shining light in the desert of dissonance and protest.
Stand with us guys, let’s get it underway!

02. February 2005 · Comments Off on They’re Not Laughing With You, They’re Laughing At You! Addendum · Categories: General, Media Matters Not

Toy Soldiers by Douglas Kern.

Major “Matt” Mason Shot Down.

More Loved Ones Captured.

Via Reynolds.

Add any more you find to the comments.

01. February 2005 · Comments Off on They’re Not Laughing With You, They’re Laughing At You! · Categories: General, Media Matters Not

To: The Associated Press
From: Sgt. Mom
Re: Another Story, Too Good to Be True

1. Honestly, it does not take all that much to fool you guys, these days. Ummm… it might be that gullibility may not be a good survival trait for an international news service. I know you want to be first with the scoop, but the speed with which this particular story was debunked reflects no credit. You do have editors? Someone with a sharp eye and a little bit of knowlege? How about a Boy Scout with rabies?*

2. On the other hand, I rejoice to see that my previous memo on the subject of the proper application of humor is being taken seriously.

3. I don’t think we need any more pics of “Sorority Slut Barbie” though**.

Carry on, all
Sgt. Mom

*Obscure Maxwell Smart reference
**Google this yourself. It’s not as if dirty minds need encouragment

31. January 2005 · Comments Off on I Am So Disappointed! · Categories: General

One of my most-favored blog-peers, Glenn Reynolds, seems to disfavor the Right of Secession. So, I put this to you Glenn, man of Law and Letters, tell us how it is? And please place your argument in pre-1860 terms. Well, perhaps that means you must tell it to us how it was?

The fact is, secession was progressing apace under James Buchanan. It took the Unionist administration, under The Great Traitor, Lincoln, to go intransigent over the inconsequential forts at Charleston and Pensacola.

And then, when his unpopular war was getting politically out-of-hand, he did a very Bush43-esce move, and changed the whole paradigm from preservation of the Union, to emancipation of the slaves.

Of course, I could go deeper, into Lincoln’s unconstitutional suspension of Habeas Corpus (which also ties neatly into today), or his unconstitutional leveling of an income tax. But I think we are in agreement there.

And I might romanticize The Confederacy. But I can’t. We also agree it was a disaster. But, can I deny its right to exist? No!

Update: I was just rereading Lincoln’s July 4, 1861 Address Before the Joint Special Session of Congress. I suggest that anyone not familiar with it give it a read. It very much confirms the notion that Lincoln was indeed a “smooth talking lawyer.”

In it, Lincoln constructs the sophistry that all States, including the original 13, did not exist as sovereign entities prior to the creation of the Union. And that the several States are entities of the Union, in the manner that counties are entities of the States. He even goes so far as to claim that The Republic of Texas was not a “state” – thereby totally contorting the English language. Every sovereign nation is also a state. To give a modern-day example: we use the terms “State of Israel” and “Nation of Israel” interchangeably.

Lincoln relies on the notion which we here in America often condemn our European friends for: that rights emanate from the governing body, and are granted to the governed. This is contrary to the very principle that we Americans hold most dear: that each individual is sovereign unto themselves, and surrender certain limited powers to the States, with the intention of maintaining an orderly society.

Admittedly, the Right of Secession is not specified in the Constitution; it requires a certain amount of penumbral reasoning. But I seem to recall critiquing (favorably) an article by Glenn where he favors the concept of penumbral reasoning. I agree with Antifederalist Patrick Henry; the Preamble should have started with “We the People, of the States of…” Then perhaps Lincoln would not have been able to sow his misconceptions. But the Tenth Amendment, without which the Constitution, and thus the Union, would have never have existed, clearly states: “The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people. ”

Further, Lincoln takes on faith the notion that partition of a nation will set of a domino effect leading to total chaos. We know from several latter-day examples that this simply is not the case. I ask, did Ethiopia cease to exist after the creation of Eritrea?

I must further ask, how is it that the dissolution of Yugoslavia was a good thing, and not the dissolution of the United States. Further, I must ask how anyone who supports a war which featured Grant’s Siege of Vicksburg, and Sherman’s March to the Sea, possibly have moral standing to condemn Saddam’s Repression of the Kurds?

31. January 2005 · Comments Off on Does Anyone Know About The Kumars At No 42? · Categories: General

This seems as though it will be an absolute farcical bust-up – somewhat akin to My Talk Show. Any feedback out there?

31. January 2005 · Comments Off on The Poisoned Pool · Categories: General, Media Matters Not

In the twilight afterglow of the Edward Morrow era of journalism, the only people that I remember routinely complaining about bias, selective reporting, or outright lies in journalism—print and broadcast both— were of the far-right-over-the-horizon John Birch Society persuasion, sourly grumbling about creeping godless communism (or maybe it was godless creeping communism) at cocktail parties or in letters to the editor. Considering that John Reed and Walter Duranty, among others, made careers out of painting world socialism in far more sunny colors than completely unbiased and disinterested journalism required, I have to concede that those doughty anti-communists of my youth may have had a point. On the whole, it was a given that the main-stream media outlets of the American mid-century had enormous stores of credibility with the public.

It was accepted that the major newspapers, the big three television channels were generally telling the truth, as fairly and as accurately as they knew it. Reporters might be lied to by sources, might be misled or mistaken, might miss the story entirely… but if it was in the paper or on the 6 PM news, well, then it must be an accurate reflection of reality. Our media was not like the Russian propaganda organ, Pravda, which had to be read carefully, teasing out small nuggets of information from tiny scraps inadvertently included, or deduced from a sudden appearance of certain topics. This was American, damn it, and serious reporters had the benefit of the doubt. Only the supermarket tabloids with pictures of monkey babies and hundred-year old shipwreck survivors were assumed to have made up stories out of whole cloth.

I honestly can’t— and won’t given the depths to which the profession has lately fallen— claim to be a paid-up member myself, on the basis of an eight-week shake-and-bake military broadcaster course at the Defense Information School, but I spent a fair amount of time after that, loitering meaningfully in the neighborhood where acts of journalism were being committed; radio and television news, and dabbling a little in the print side. I know the mechanics of interviewing, editing, and writing fourteen lines per minute of copy, or how many yards and minutes of tape wind up in the trash can, because fifteen minutes of talk with an expert must be boiled down to a 15-second insert into a story written in the active voice and taking care to pronounce all the names right. I know that I usually had a pretty good idea of where I was going with a story; because I was in in-house hack for the military establishment… it was what they paid me for.

I was also a voracious news consumer, considering it part of my job to know the direction from which every imaginable s**tstorm might come, and to where TDY orders might send the military personnel who were my audience. I read or had subscriptions to… well, practically everything, at one time or another. Time, Newsweek, International Herald Tribune, Stars and Stripes, Rolling Stone, the military Times newspapers, Harpers’, Atlantic, Working Woman, National Geographic, Smithsonian, MS, Guardian Weekly, National Review, Mother Jones, Utne Reader, Spy, Brills’ Content, Village Voice, History Today, American Heritage…just for starters. The fringier publications often had stories that were a long way off on the horizon; I remember the Village Voice being about the first to start airing troubling doubts about alleged satanic child abuse at day care centers, months before the more mainstream news started taking those doubts seriously, too. Of course, every outlet, every magazine had a different take, a different emphasis, a different angle, and obviously some of the above had a little more credibility than others, and more than a few grains of salt necessary as an adjunct.

When did the rot begin? Hard to say, really, since there has always some potential for distortion of the news. The great press magnates of the mid century did have their foibles: Henry Booth Luce was so enchanted with Chiang Kai-shek and his wife that he (and by extension Time Magazine) overlooked for twenty years the Generalissimo’s complete ineptitude at governing China. No note was ever taken of Roosevelt’s almost complete reliance on braces, wheelchairs and the sturdy arms of aides all during his presidency… or more alarmingly, JFK’s compulsive serial womanizing during his, although both were open secrets among the press corps. Some will argue for Watergate, when the thrill of taking down a presidency put blood in the water for the ambitious investigative reporter seeking fame everlasting.

Peter Boyer’s “Who Killed CBS”, from twenty years ago puts the blame squarely on the emphasis in television news— specifically CBS news, and 60 Minutes— on emphasizing a gripping visual image at the expense of plain facts, of news as entertainment spectacle. A modern morality play as it were. James Fallows in “Breaking the News” put the blame on—among other things— a disconnect between the consumers of news, and the highly paid elite press corps. Whether the genesis of the current situation was ten, twenty or thirty years ago is almost irrelevant, in light of that everything that has piled on in the last three or four years.

Any sort of list has to include CNN maintaining their bureau in Baghdad by quietly killing stories about Saddam Hussein’s atrocities. It has to include mention of how coverage of the Middle East is warped by major international news services reliance on local stringers who have every reason to tilt their dispatches very much to one side. Of how on-scene reportage on the West Bank and Gaza is controlled by the Palestinians, who control access of the place to film crews and reporters. Of photographers who are marvelously on the spot when car bombs, ambushes and executions are going down, and respected news professionals insist that it is their obligation to watch it all happen. Or of reporters like Sy Hersh, whose past performance guarantees a pulpit for dubious and improbable stories of war crimes committed by the American military. It has to include stories based on transparent frauds and forgeries, on political hit-pieces perpetrated by reporters insisting that, no; they really, really are totally unbiased. It has to include stories where interviewees are presented as being merely interview subjects, when they are actually deeply compromised, with a strong interest in the coverage of the story one way or the other.

The pool has been poisoned.

I never was one of those people who assumed that just because it was broadcast, or in print, that therefore it must be true, but when I read or listen to something now, I am thinking: OK, who is this that you are talking too, and what is their game. What is yours? Why did you pick that expert out of your golden rolodex? Who is your local stringer, or your taxicab driver? Your local minder? Who gave you the lead and why? Why does your voice sound somehow warmer, more enthusiastic, when you talk to, or about this person or situation? What footage wound up in the wastebasket? How many people did you talk to before you got the answer that fitted your mental outline of the story? Where have you been before, who really writes your paycheck, and why? How long have you been in this place, how much do you really know, based on your previous reportage?

The saddest part of this new era of journalism, is that I already assume that I am being lied to, until otherwise confirmed by research. It is good to be an informed and savvy consumer… but what trust and credibility the mainstream media have carelessly pissed away.

Edward R. Morrow is probably revolving in his grave like a Black & Decker drill.

Update: Just exercising my privileges as an admin here, as the freaking system won’t recognize my comment:

Somehow, darling, I can’t imagine you attending any cocktail parties in “the twilight afterglow of the [Edward R. Murrow] era of journalism,: as he moved from CBS to the USIA in 1961. 😉 — KC

31. January 2005 · Comments Off on Something I’d Like To See: · Categories: General

50,000 women marching in the streets of Riyadh carrying this as a poster:

Iraq Blue Finger

Hat Tip: The Conglomerate, whose Gordon Smith thinks George Bush should hold a blue finger up at his State of the Union Address on Wednesday.

28. January 2005 · Comments Off on Proliferation Of Counterfeiting · Categories: General, World

It seems that product counterfeiting has become quite rampant. Might we consider this to be a matter of vital national interest?

The scale of the threat is prompting new efforts by multinationals to stop, or at least curb, the spread of counterfeits. Companies are deploying detectives around the globe in greater force than ever, pressuring governments from Beijing to Brasília to crack down, and trying everything from electronic tagging to redesigned products to aggressive pricing in order to thwart the counterfeiters. Even some Chinese companies, stung by fakes themselves, are getting into the act. “Once Chinese companies start to sue other Chinese companies, the situation will become more balanced,” says Stephen Vickers, chief executive of International Risk, a Hong Kong-based brand-protection consultant.

China is key to any solution. Since the country is an economic gorilla, its counterfeiting is turning into quite the beast as well — accounting for nearly two-thirds of all the fake and pirated goods worldwide. Daimler’s Glatz figures phony Daimler parts — from fenders to engine blocks — have grabbed 30% of the market in China, Taiwan, and Korea. And Chinese counterfeiters make millions of motorcycles a year, with knockoffs of Honda’s (HMC ) workhorse CG125 — selling for about $300, or less than half the cost of a real Honda — especially popular. It’s tales like this that prompt some trade hawks in the U.S. to call for a World Trade Organization action against China related to counterfeits and intellectual-property rights violations in general. Such pressure is beginning to have some effect. “The Chinese government is starting to take things more seriously because of the unprecedented uniform shouting coming from the U.S., Europe, and Japan,” says Joseph Simone, a lawyer specializing in IPR issues at Baker & McKenzie in Hong Kong.

28. January 2005 · Comments Off on Memo for the “Honorable Gentleman” from Massachusetts* · Categories: General, Rant

To: Senator Edward Kennedy
From: Sgt Mom
Re: Exit Strategy

1. Allow me to break it to you gently, Senator: there is an exit strategy in place for American troops in Iraq. It calls for leaving when Iraq is a democratic, stable and prosperous country, and the majority of bitter-end Baathists and traveling jihadi wanna-bees are either in the jug, in the grave or taking up more sedentary hobbies like needlepoint or building ships in bottles… and not one damned minute sooner.

2. Any publicized plan involving predetermined quantities of troops and calendar dates for withdrawing is an invitation to disaster…not for us, of course. For the Iraqis. Just like it was for the South Vietnamese. You remember South Vietnam, Senator Kennedy? Put down the whiskey bottle and concentrate, man. We had an exit strategy there, too… phased troop withdrawals, a set schedule, all that. It worked really, really well. Still can’t remember? Try the words “sell-out”, or “betrayal”, or even “left in the lurch”. Still can’t remember? Tell you what, there must be some nice Vietnamese restaurants in Boston or Washington… go get some pho or some spring rolls, and strike up a conversation with the owner or manager, I am sure they can fill you in, especially if they are about fifty or sixty or so.

3. Now that we have gotten that straight, it occurs to me that we could use an exit strategy for American troops in a couple of countries which are now democratic, stable and relatively prosperous: Germany and South Korea come to mind immediately. Please turn your piercing intellect and dazzling command of foreign policy matters towards an exit strategy from kasernes and camps there.

4. Oh, and while you are pondering, please come up with an exit strategy for departing the UN, too. With a little practice, this exit strategy stuff could really catch on, and we are relying on you to do your bit… just as long as someone else does the driving, mmmkay?

Sincerely,
Sgt. Mom

*Note: these are not “scare” quote marks. These are “viciously skeptical” quote marks.

28. January 2005 · Comments Off on Sorry, Ms Rimes · Categories: General, That's Entertainment!

I have just listened to (again) country music superstar Leann Rimes, on FNC’s Hannity & Colmes. Man – she is a lovely young woman. Her voice is pitch-perfect. And she has incredible range.

But, that said, her voice is also incredibly sterile (particularly for a country artist). She lacks any sort of depth or nuance. For the same reasons I find Judy Garland to be the greatest recorded female vocalist ever (followed closely by Sarah Vaughn), I find Leann to be an also-ran.

28. January 2005 · Comments Off on What A F__king Mess! · Categories: General

I have just visited, again, Fox News Channel’s website. Gawd, what an imponderable mess! I have accessed so many Fox News articles via Google, which I might never have found via their own website, that I have lost count!

So, just now, I want to send an email to Neil Cavuto. Will somebody please tell me how?