28. October 2005 · Comments Off on Idotic TV · Categories: History

I just saw some crap on The History Channel: What the Victorians Gave Us, where the idiot historian/presenter claimed that King Camp Gillette was the first to give us a “disposable consumer product” with his razor blade in 1895. Well, besides the fact that Gillette was an AMERICAN, I say it was Peter Durand, with his canned food process (the can being disposable) in 1810, not Gillette.

But I could be (and likely am) wrong. If you have an earlier example of a disposable consumer product – please post up.

28. October 2005 · Comments Off on The Comparo That Had To Be · Categories: General

On the cover of my latest Automobile magazine (11/05): “Civil War! Z06 vs Ford GT vs Viper [coupe].” I expect the other major automags will follow suit.

Of course, revivals of the old Chevy, Ford, Dodge rivalry aside, this is more a matter of contrast than comparison, as these are three distinctly different cars. But some excerpts are worth noting:

[T]hese are America’s greatest cars – and two of them, the GT and the Corvette, are among the world’s best cars.

In performance, price, and driving pleasure, [the Z06] blows the current Porsche 911 Carrera S away[.]

Now all the American industry has to do is up the ante with its more affordable cars

Well, the ante is being upped – across the board. I’ve raved about other new American cars on this blog – the Opel Omega based Cadillac CTS comes to mind. And now it seems the Mazda 6 based Ford Fusion is a star player.

27. October 2005 · Comments Off on Are you put off by “Tony Sinclair”? · Categories: General

Well then you really should be by that absolutely repulsive Glenfiddich dude – who seems to be a pathetic Ralph Lauren rip-off.

I don’t get this – Glenfiddich ain’t Tanqueray – we are talking about a premium brand here. Why do they need to resort to such addlebrained marketing tactics?

27. October 2005 · Comments Off on How Personally Poignant… · Categories: General

…At this time: the death of Rosa Parks. And her celebration, in many circles, as “the mother of the civil rights movement.”

As it turns out, I have been working on an article, premised upon the afro-centric view of racism in America, and the general denial of racism in the southwest.

I’ve chosen as my focus for this piece, the case of Mendez v. Westminster – Which preceded Brown v. Board of Education by several years. This has particular gravitas for me, as, while I attended Johnson Intermediate – the site of the Mendez farm, I was never taught about this. Neither have any of my California-schooled contemporaries! In fact, a query with one of my favorite Constitutional scholars – Eugene Volokh of UCLA – got the reply, “never heard of it.” In fact, even the Mendez’ granddaughter had not heard of it, until she studied at UCR.

To date, I want to thank Prof. Vicki Ruiz, of UCI, for her help. It seems there were other cases – Alverez v. Lemon Grove, which preceded Mendez, and others in Texas and Arizona, which followed, which all led up to Brown. I’m working on those now.

I hope to tie this all together under an umbrella of general racism and segregation.

24. October 2005 · Comments Off on What? Another GM Masterpiece? · Categories: General

One the cover of my latest (10/05) Automobile magazine: Soltice Rocks!

24. October 2005 · Comments Off on Movie Trivia For 10/25/05 · Categories: That's Entertainment!

Along the same line-of-thought as my last movie trivia puzzle, here’s another:

In an effort to counter Cinerama, this studio developed this format, in which they filmed this “swords and sandals” epic. However, the format was not fully appreciated in the film’s blockbuster roadshow premier, as few theaters could accommodate this aspect ratio.

Extra Credit: As the above mentioned film wasn’t ready to shoot, the above mentioned studio chose to first do this totally forgettable film, from which some of the scenes were used in this Cinerama epic.

Update: Congratx to reader Atlanta Lawyer, who got it all right off the mark. (see comments).

23. October 2005 · Comments Off on EeK!!!! Nationwide, 100 People Die Every Year!!! · Categories: General

What is it – a national hiccup pandemic? No!!!! it’s that insidious evil – street racing!!!!!

And, of course, the cops are calling for “tough new laws” to “bring this problem under control.” And what do they want most? property seizure! Of course, it has worked so well with drugs, gambling, whatever. But mostly, it gives the cops MORE MONEY – so they can protect us better!!!!

Let’s think clearly here: If only 100 people per year have died as a result of organized street racing – just think of how many more would have perished, had they been doing the same thing in an unorganized manner?!?!?

Don’t think I’m giving a blanket endorsement to street racing here – I very much prefer taking it to the tracks. But, when that is not an easy option, well organized street racing is far preferable to unorganized street racing. In fact, properly done, it turns the streets into a track – much like Long Beach or Monaco – albeit without government imprimatur.

But, of course, that government imprimatur is the all-important factor.

BIG WILLIE AND THE BROTHERHOOD FOREVER!

23. October 2005 · Comments Off on Wish I Could Afford To Live By Myself Just Now. · Categories: General

But don’t we all, at one time or another (particularly if we have children 🙂 )?

But that’s not what this post is about. I’m talking about “urban living” coming to Los Angeles. (Well, actually, in this case, Long Beach.) Actually, these things have been popping up here-and-there for the last few years. But nothing has gained what we might term as “critical mass,” because “Los Angeles” – the sprawling polyglot that it is, has no real “urban center.”

I love this development – mostly because I love the architecture of the ’20s and ’30s. This is classic Greek revival. But this, art deco, craftsman – it’s all good. I would prefer my “loft” be on a hilltop overlooking the coast – about five or ten miles away. But even barren homesites like that within commuting distance of any west coast city are over a million dollars these days.

23. October 2005 · Comments Off on Why Don’t They Ever Get This Right? · Categories: History

I’m watching some stupid travel film on one of my local PBS stations – I thought it was going to be about trains – but it is about train routes – eek!!!!. Anyway, they are talking about Chicago. And, like all these idiotic things, they say, [you can put any number of things in place of this] “Chicago owes its greatness to the fact that it is in the very heart of the corn-belt” [I know; this one was particularly stupid].

It’s always something different- it’s beef, or it’s coal, or who knows what! Why can’t these idiots EVER get it right? Chicago owes not only its (somewhat questionable) greatness, BUT ITS VERY EXISTENCE to the fact that it is along the shortest portage route between Lake Michigan and the Des Plaines River (and then on to the Mississippi). This should be elementary American history.

23. October 2005 · Comments Off on No, Schumer – Even You Aren’t That Stupid. · Categories: Politics

On NBC’s Meet the Press today, when talking about the Wilson/Plame affair, Sen. Charles Schumer (D – NY) said about special prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald: “He is a prosecutor’s prosecutor – and I will abide by his decision.”

WTF – you idiot: You are a SENATOR. Unless this comes down to a matter of impeachment (highly unlikely), it doesn’t matter whether you “abide” by any actions of Fitzgerald or not. And even than, your statement of prejudice, before hearing the case, would be quite damning.

More proof that you are little more than a pea-brained Jackass Party hack.

Update: Eek!!! I just realized I started this post with a proclamation that Schumer couldn’t possibly be that stupid, and ended it with a statement that he must be that stupid! Make of it what you will.

21. October 2005 · Comments Off on Well, I finally Saw Serenity · Categories: General

And I tell ya’ – I am absolutely underwhelmed. Seriously – this was like a really-really good Firefly episode – stretched into a feature film.

21. October 2005 · Comments Off on Movie Trivia For 10/18/05 · Categories: That's Entertainment!

Well, I tell ya’, if you check the last few posts, you’ll know I’m dead-peddling here – you guys really have me on the ropes.

Anyway: while I’m regrouping, let me just throw out this standard pitch for you:

Everyone knows Elizabeth Taylor was the first starlet to get a one million dollar guarantee for her work in Cleopatra. But she was the second, for this film.

Update: It’s obvious I’ve Stumped the Band here: so you search-engine mavens – have at it.

Anyway, I’ve got what I think is a real neuron-tickler up next. But, as my record at predicting these things is, I bet you’ll get it in the first hour.

Update 2: congratz to reader Atlanta Lawyer (see comments).

21. October 2005 · Comments Off on Who Hasn’t Ronnie Earle Indicted? · Categories: General, Politics

Well, one of them is former Texas Attorney General Dan Morales, who should be getting near the end of his federal prison term just now.

Of course, Jackass Party hacks like to make big on the fact that he has also gone after prominent Democrats.

And he has also gone after some major corporations.

I’m not so sure Mr. Earle’s targets are chosen on strictly partisan grounds. But politics isn’t distinctly red and blue. With that in mind, it does seem to me as though Mr. Earle’s discretion over whom to prosecute or not is politically tainted

21. October 2005 · Comments Off on Yahoo! Down Again!!! · Categories: Technology

I have gotten pretty upset with our hosting service from time-to-time. But it’s times like these which remind me that shit happens even with the biggest and the best of ’em.

Over the past week or two, I’ve been having really slow response, at various times, from various Yahoo! services. Now, I’ve had zero response (can’t even log on) from Yahoo! IM for over half an hour.

Update: close to an hour now, and still nothing – no: there it goes. I’d test it, but there be no-one online just now I particularly want to chat with. 🙂

Anyway: 50 minutes of down-time is pretty bad for Yahoo! IM. This reflects my hesitance to get into Vonage, or any of those other low-cost VoIP long distance services. I mean, the telephone works more than anything in my life but water and sewer. And I don’t pay much for phone service – why fuck with it?

As of 7:10am local time, Yahoo! IM is down again. I’ll check back from time-to-time. 7:25 – now it’s back up. 7:56 – down for about the last 5 minutes. 8:20 – up now.

20. October 2005 · Comments Off on I’m With Cupid · Categories: That's Entertainment!

This has to be my favorite King of the Hill episode. This is the one where we are introduced to “The Boomhauer Principle” – something I learned myself (in a different context, where it is more appropriately accredited to Zig Ziggler) when selling strawberries door-to-door, at the age of eight. It’s all the same. 🙂

20. October 2005 · Comments Off on Voter Fraud And Murder Conspiracy · Categories: Politics

This from Gateway Pundit:
The St. Louis area has seen 16 Democrat election workers convicted of voter fraud or similar charges this past year. This past week an obstruction of justice and plotting to murder a government voter fraud witness can be added to that list of Democrat convictions:

Sounds to me like a return of Democratic “machine politics”.

Hat Tip: InstaPundit

20. October 2005 · Comments Off on Good Morning Reading · Categories: Politics

Glenn Reynolds has a link and quote-filled post concerning the need for porkbusting and beyond. I particularly like this quote from Mark Tappscott:

Mr. Smith is back in Washington, and his name is Tom Coburn.

17. October 2005 · Comments Off on Titus Pullo, Reporting For Duty · Categories: General

I think many will agree that HBO’s Rome has to be the best (somewhat) fictional show on TV just now.

And I’m sure only regular viewers will get the humor in my headline. 🙂

17. October 2005 · Comments Off on An Interesting Juxtaposition · Categories: General, Politics

When I am home at these hours, I typically watch FNC’s Special Report with Brit Hume, followed immediately by MSNBC’s Hardball with Chris Matthews. And the difference in predisposition is almost comical. This is most striking relative to the Wilson/Plame affair. At Fox, they are all asking each other “where’s the crime?” And at MSNBC, they are assuming a crime has been committed, and wondering about the repercussions.

17. October 2005 · Comments Off on Eek! I Might Just Have Nightmares About This · Categories: That's Entertainment!

I am off to bed, but just heard, on my local PBS station, a rape of one of my all-time favorite arias: Gershwin’s Rapsody In Blue, on a re-broadcast of The Lawrence Welk Show from the ’60s. It’s like – I became “musically aware” in the mid-to-late ’60s, just as FM radio was taking over, and Welk was on his last gasps (ABC finally canceled the show in 1971). And now I’m thinking, “how could people listen to this dreck – it’s like one jump above elevator music?”

Update: I know I am being a bit elitist here: But much of the power of Rhapsody in Blue is in its dynamic range – that rapid transition from diminuendo to crescendo, as well, with this or any other great classical aria, one looks for the subtle differences in arrangement from one conductor/orchestra to another – those little fades when transitioning from one section to another – the vibratos and harmonics…

But, in the world of Welk music, all this is sanitized, homogenized, and compressed so as to appeal to those whom we “elitists” refer to as “the unwashed masses”. But, among those, are oh-so-many who like what they are hearing simply because they have never heard anything else. Or, when they’ve heard it, they were so startled that they have retreated back into thier Welk (or Grand Ol’ Opry, or mass-market radio) world.

But, it’s the second law of economics: “everything happens on the margin.” I’m looking for those marginal players – whether they are into Welk, or Trisha Yearwood, or Britney Spears, they are simply there because they don’t know anything else. I am a musical evangelical; I trust that when these people hear The Sound, they will become converts.

16. October 2005 · Comments Off on Oh, This Should Be Interesting… · Categories: General

…Upcoming on one of my local PBS stations: Examining The Religious Far Right:

Most Americans outside the Bible Belt have little idea of the beliefs held by millions of fundamentalist churchgoers. There is an almost total lack of awareness of the rise of Dominionism and Christian Reconstructionism, forms of theology that advocate a biblical vision of God’s kingdom on earth. Some fundamentalists also foresee events such as the Rapture, the Times of Tribulation, Armageddon, and the Second Coming of Christ as we enter the End Days. Examining the Religious Far Right was videotaped at a conference that gave rigorous attention to the worldview of the religious right, its influence in contemporary political culture and its agenda for America. The 2004 election told us that socially conscious citizens need to be aware of the ambitions of this influential religious movement. What do fundamentalist theologies advocate regarding theocracy, abortion and homosexuality? What is the nature of the world order under God’s law that they anticipate? How do many fundamentalists interpret the role of Israel? How does this affect U.S. policy? Why are so many fundamentalists opposed to environmentalism and the UN? Why are millions in America drawn to this form of belief, and how can we come to understand them? Executive producer Al Perlmutter brings this important conference coverage as America grapples with the growing influence of fundamentalist religion and its political goals. Conference Participants: Karen Armstrong, Chip Berlet, Joan Bokaer, Frederick Clarkson, Dr. Robert Edgar, Joseph C. Hough, Jr., Skipp Porteous, Jeffrey Sharlet, Charles Strozier, John Sugg, Hugh Urban, Katherine Yurica.

Of course, considering the point of view which one might expect, I’m going into this with an open mind, but a jaundiced eye.

Update: I’m going to have to watch this again, as I am missing large pieces of it due to the thunderstorm overhead. But I can tell you right now – this is a MUST SEE. Not because it is so profound or informative, but because it is such divine high comedy. It should be titled: The Far Left Looks at the Far Right.

Update 2: It’s about bed time for me. So comprehensive blogging on this wll have to wait until tomorrow. But I have to say this: you should see this show. Just to understand the predisposition of some of the minor league power players in this game.

16. October 2005 · Comments Off on Movie Trivia For 10/17/05 · Categories: That's Entertainment!

At one point or another, these five men were principals in this well known multi-media entertainment venture: Leonard; Arthur; Julius; Milton; Herbert. (Note: no tricks here – those are real names, not the names of characters they portrayed, or some-such.)

As always, you are on your honor to refrain from using search engines (that takes all the sport out of it. 🙂 )

Update: Congratz to reader Andrew V. (see comments)

16. October 2005 · Comments Off on No Joy In Mudslide-Ville · Categories: That's Entertainment!

I won’t be doing much socializing tomorrow. Fortunately, unlike most of my friends, my Sun doesn’t rise and set based upon how my hometown baseball team does. But I can be sure, tomorrow will be a gloomy day pretty much everywhere I go (and not just because of the predicted thundershowers.

Anyway, to the White Sox fans out there: I guess it’s your turn. I mean, the last time your boys went to the Fall Classic, we didn’t even have an AL team here in California. 🙂

Seriously though: except for the bad call at the end of Game 2, this has been a really good series – two great “small ball” teams going at it with solid pitching and running, and no steroid-pumped superheros breaking windshields, or climbing the outfield wall to catch flys.

16. October 2005 · Comments Off on Response To A Disgruntled Reader · Categories: General, Site News, Technology

This is a response to Reader Scott’s comment to this post

Well Scott – it’s nice to see we still have you as a reader. But, if indeed you have been a reader for over two years, as you say, you must surely understand and appreciate the fact that, on this blog, we don’t mince words. If you act as a fool, you will be called a fool.

And all our readers should know that, were I referring specifically to you, Scott, I would have called you by name. But I used the generalization “some idiot” because your comment was typical of many readers (as well as callers, LttE writers, “People on the Street”, etc., to this or any other media) who seem to have a firmly established opinion, despite any evidence of knowledge, or rational evaluation, of the subject upon which they are commenting.

In the automotive field, I recall some idiot commenting on this post (Sorry, comment threads were deleted from the old MT blog.), who claimed his overboosted Supra Turbo was “better” than a Bentley Continental GT. Well, while I wouldn’t call myself an expert, particularly relative to the luminaries I have been in the presence of, I have had vast experience with tuner cars. And I can say, without reservation, that, while that idiotic reader’s Supra might have been “better” than a Bentley Continental GT in some very limited context, there is no way – NO WAY – that it would be an appropriate Bond Car – particularly to the Bond book reader, who knows that Bond’s car is not simply a pursuit and escape vehicle, but also a meditation chamber.

Anyway, Scott: First let me say that everyone is entitled to their opinion on styling. Personally, while I consider the Chrysler 300 to be visually interesting, and hardly offensive, and the Magnum a pretty great job at doing a station wagon (while not as great as the original Ford Taurus), I look at the Charger and say, “gawd, this piece came from the same people who gave us the Mercedes CLS?” So, perhaps we are in agreement there.

But now, when you talk about engineering, it’s a ‘ol difrn’t mata’. Your “fifty year-old” technology citation is, on its face, completely without merit. First, I have examples of crossflow cylinder head designs dating back to the ‘teens. And DOHC 4VPC designs were being done by Offenhauser, Duesenberg, and others, in the late ‘twenties. Bringing this to present-day, the most easily accessible crosspoint is in comparison of the Nissan Titan and the Dodge Ram 1500 Hemi (and, if you want to throw in the Ford F-150 – 5.4 Triton, with it’s SOHC 3VPC format, feel free). Obviously, upon comparison of the “technical specifications”, the Nissan’s motor is by far the most sophisticated. But, “when the rubber meets the road”, the comparison is far more muddled. In fact, at another, more obscure, crosspoint – The Jeep Grand Cherokee Hemi can lay the Porsche Cayenne to waste.

But, when you talk about It’s a Hemi, you are not talking about technology, you are talking about icons, And I can assure you – my mother had a ’56 Imperial Crown, and I had a ’67 GTX – Hemi is a powerful icon in American car (and popular) culture. And I can also assure you that, in today’s dismal family sedan market (from which America’s PDs prefer to draw their petrol/pursuit vehicles), the Chrysler LX platform (300, Magnum, Charger) stands a good chance of achieving iconic status itself.

15. October 2005 · Comments Off on Since Chaz Brought Up The Bugatti Veyron 16.4… · Categories: Technology

…I thought you guys might get a kick out of this post by Randall Halcomb at AutoBlog, with spyshots of a Bugatti evaluation team out with a Saleen S7 twin turbo along as a benchmark. The 987 horsepower, 253 mph Bugatti has eclipsed the 750 horsepower Saleen, and the 806 horsepower Koenigsegg CCR for the moment. But it is rumored that Steve Saleen has a 1000+ HP variation in the works. And Dan Knott, Director of Chrysler Group’s Street and Racing Technologies, expects to see a whole crop of 1000hp supercars in the near future.

Of course, it’s a bit silly to try to compare the two. The Bugatti is a 4300 pound luxury grand tourer, most comparable to the Mercedes McLaren SLR, while the Saleen is a 2950 pound street racer, most competitive with the Koenigsegg CCR or Pagani Zonda F.

15. October 2005 · Comments Off on 6.2 Pounds Per Horsepower · Categories: Technology

By now, every Car Guy in the world knows that figure applies to the incredible new Corvette Z06. I was going to blog on this a month ago. But I wanted to wait until Larry Webster’s Car and Driver article was available online, specifically so I could excerpt this quote:

Europeans gawked at the car and seemed to applaud it. They likely were unaware that they were witnessing the arrival of a car that exposes the majority of European sports cars for what they are: overpriced, underperforming snobs.

Of course, some idiot will likely comment that the Z06 MUST be crap because it is a Chevrolet, or perhaps because of its “50 year-old engine technology” (and it doesn’t even have crossflow heads, like the Chrysler Hemi).

Well, the facts are: While they share the bowtie, Corvette functions as an autonomous division within GM. Indeed, Corvettes have less in common with lesser Chevrolets than Buicks do. As well, the Z06 is a $66,000 technological tour de’force. Even the fact that they got 427 cubic inches out of that “50 year-old engine technology” AND got it to turn 7000 rpm (titanium connecting rods help there) is an engineering wonder. (Note: Lingenfelter has had a 427 small block for several years. But a 427 Lingenfelter engine alone will cost you $25,000).

I suspect, when these start rolling out the dealer’s doors, they will be at a substantial premium over the $66,000 price. But when you consider that you can also expect to pay a huge dealer premium over the price of a $154,000 Ford GT, or a $180,000 Ferrari F430 (IF your Ferrari dealer likes you enough to sell you one at all), that’s par-for-the-course.

I have yet to drive any C6 Corvettes. But I’ve got a lot of experience with C5s in various configurations. And, for all its luster, and despite Road & Track’s Douglas Kott’s claim that the new Z06’s ride is actually more supple than the C5 Z51, the Z06 is really overkill. And, when you consider that, for the price you are likely to actually pay, you can buy yourself a well-optioned C6 coupe (with a removable top – not available on the Z06) AND get your wife a new Dodge Hemi Magnum, it’s advisable to ask yourself if you REALLY need what it has to offer.

14. October 2005 · Comments Off on THE BEST New Show On TV · Categories: That's Entertainment!

If you have not yet seen Survivorman on the Discovery Science Channel – WATCH IT; you don’t know when you might need these skills. I thought myself a pretty adept survivalist before. But, watching this, I have been reminded that my talents were limited to the Pacific Coastal, Cascade, and Sierra Nevada mountains, deserts, and shoreline which I have hiked. What about the arctic tundra, a Georgia bayou, or the Mosquito Coast? Les Stroud does it all – and he does it for real.